Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,381
- 8,617
I'm not a coffee drinker but much appreciate the offer. Beyond that you can always put me on an ignore list if my dad jokes bother you.Keep this joke going and I'll put 100 CC's of something in your coffee!![]()
Nice to see people coming around on Hage, who deserves a lot more attention than he's gotten. But I still can't see him going in the top 10, despite the fact he probably deserves to be considered in that range.I think Hage, after a year of Michigan, will be a top 5 forward in this draft.
Yeah I'd actually count that lol...but that needed not one but TWO lottery wins in three years to happen, both sandwiching a playoff appearance to boot. The odds against just that alone are pretty minute.2015 - Zacha
2017 - Nico
2019 - Hughes
And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
A ton of money just came in on Buium. Intriguing.The other day Buium was +2000 to be picked 3rd. Today he’s +250. Big movement.
And there was the other guy in 2016. 4 centers in 5 drafts.2015 - Zacha
2017 - Nico
2019 - Hughes
And where did Zacha play for us? Again, the positions listed say center but these players tend to move from wing to center as needed
And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
I was waiting for this exact example too lol
Staal centered next to Malkin outside a single year before he left Pittsburgh; which, IMO, goes exactly to show that three top-pick centers down the middle does not work
And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
I was waiting for this exact example too lol
Staal centered next to Malkin outside a single year before he left Pittsburgh; which, IMO, goes exactly to show that three top-pick centers down the middle does not work
And there was the other guy in 2016. 4 centers in 5 drafts.
Also Mercer in 2020, lol. We drafted almost nothing but centers and left defensemen for half a decade.
That’s blatantly untrue. He spent most of his time as the third line center. You can literally find articles talking about him being the best 3rd line center in the league from 2008-12.And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
I was waiting for this exact example too lol
Staal centered next to Malkin outside a single year before he left Pittsburgh; which, IMO, goes exactly to show that three top-pick centers down the middle does not work
Staal was in Pittsburgh six years and a top faceoff guy there. If anyone shifted over it was Malkin at times but that's an example of how it CAN work if the three players in question are all centers. One can move over, or become an elite third line guy (cue the Nico memes).And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
I was waiting for this exact example too lol
Staal centered next to Malkin outside a single year before he left Pittsburgh; which, IMO, goes exactly to show that three top-pick centers down the middle does not work
Trevor Zegras is likely to be out of Anaheim because he wants to play center and wont ever be a better one, positionally, than McTavish or CarlssonYou really think Celebrini or Jack would both refuse to play wing?
C'mon, you said you wouldn't draft Celebrini if we had 1st overall. A ridiculous statement.
This also shows that drafting BPA works as the 3 of them won a Cup.
They would be perfectly capable of doing so but wouldn’t need to if it really came to it.And where did Zacha play for us? Again, the positions listed say center but these players tend to move from wing to center as needed
Celebrini Hischier and Hughes are not and would not play wing unless their shoulder is broken (sorry Jack lol)
You're moving the goalposts. Here's what you wrote:And where did Zacha play for us? Again, the positions listed say center but these players tend to move from wing to center as needed
Celebrini Hischier and Hughes are not and would not play wing unless their shoulder is broken (sorry Jack lol)
And where did Jordan Staal play? It wasnt center behind those two
I was waiting for this exact example too lol
Staal centered next to Malkin outside a single year before he left Pittsburgh; which, IMO, goes exactly to show that three top-pick centers down the middle does not work
We moved off Mercer at center seemingly quicker than we moved off Parise at center in 2005 lolAnd there was the other guy in 2016. 4 centers in 5 drafts.
Also Mercer in 2020, lol. We drafted almost nothing but centers and left defensemen for half a decade.
I don't think it's a myth. Example, the NY Giants had a number of good linebackers in 1981. They had Carson, Kelly, Hunt, and Van Pelt. All legit NFL guys. There was, however, a clear BPA at number 2 in the draft. The Giants needed just about everything else other than LB. They were pretty bad. OK, maybe they didn't need a QB as Simms was still very young. You know who they picked and it was the correct pick. They repeated that several years later with Carl Banks and then again with Pepper Johnson. I'm sure there are plenty of quotes from teams that have selected guys based on a list of prospects that presumably ranks how good they are? I recall Fitz being quoted to that effect when Mukhamadullin was picked? I'm sure there are instances where a team selects from a tier of similarly ranked guys to go with need as a tie breaker but I'm skeptical that a team will avoid a clearly better player to pick a clearly worse player just based on position.Drafting 'Best Player Available' is and always has been a myth
Every single pick made is based on need
Just as a hypothetical: if a team had just drafted Luke Hughes and Owen Power top-5 picks b2b years - there is a less than 0% chance they take the 'BPA' in another LD top-5 in a third draft in a row. Not even would they take a consensus 1st overall, theyd trade out
Thats because theres inherently a need for every reason behind taking a pick; it never was or will be as simple as 'i think he ends up the best'
I have said as much and agree - the POSITION you take isnt the issue, its what the players actually plays that isStaal was in Pittsburgh six years and a top faceoff guy there. If anyone shifted over it was Malkin at times but that's an example of how it CAN work if the three players in question are all centers. One can move over, or become an elite third line guy (cue the Nico memes).
Perhaps this is the mixup im having with some - i chose the worst position for this lolTo be fair if the player in position is a LW, a RW, a LD or a RD then no it's unlikely THAT position gets picked three years in short order. Center is the only one where it can work because you can literally shift one guy over or just have three horses the way the Pens did.
Sure but not less than 0 (which is what he orginally said) if there’s a player you like significantly more available.To be fair if the player in position is a LW, a RW, a LD or a RD then no it's unlikely THAT position gets picked three years in short order. Center is the only one where it can work because you can literally shift one guy over or just have three horses the way the Pens did.
I don't think we can understate how ridiculous it would be if Demidov fell to NJ at #10.Pronman’s final mock has Demidov to Calgary and Iggy still on board. Hopefully they’d pass on Demidov for Iggy and he’d be there for us
Its about where they playedMate, the Pens went back to back finals (winning one) with all three of them. Take the L.
I don't think we can understate how ridiculous it would be if Demidov fell to NJ at #10.
1) I've said this several times and will say it again -- Demidov is closer to Celebrini than to #3 in the 2024 class. He's a unique player who combines elite skills across the board offensively with a shockingly heavy compete level and excellent 200-foot game.
2) Demidov is #1 in this entire draft in passing and puck handling, and it's not close. Catton is a far-off #2 in both. Demidov is a top 10 shooter in this class as well. His ability to manipulate multiple defenders several steps ahead of his intended goal -- whether opening a passing, shooting or skating lane -- is extremely rare. His hockey IQ with the puck is tops in this draft as well, although with overall IQ it's hard to put him above Celebrini and Helenius. Still, he's special.
3) In several drafts on talent alone, Demidov would be worthy of the #1 overall pick. Not this year with Celebrini or last year with Bedard, but certainly 2022.