Wasn't trying to make it an East-West thing, just that I found that interesting. The Senators for example are an Eastern team that's also gotten absolutely screwed the last decade, but they did have their picks in the 90s. But the point was more traffic overall is in the east, which is also where the money teams are. You don't find it odd a team like the Rangers come outright and say they are tanking despite just coming off years of playoffs, never even finish bottom 5, but win the lottery twice? Yet a team like Arizona or Anaheim who perpetually struggled for a decade never won once? Or how teams like Toronto or Montreal finish last just one year and of course win #1, along with most other years when secondary markets finish last but get jumped by bigger markets? Or how Chicago forced its two stars out then wins the lottery for the guy to replace them?
Idunno. Again, no proof, but to say "hurr durr conspiracy" without really thinking about it is pretty silly in it's own. Rigged or not, NHL wants stars in big places, and wants money teams making as much as possible. They certainly would've never let a team like Anaheim or Arizona have the draft luck that some of the others have had the last two decades thats for sure.