Harry Kakalovich
Registered User
With news of Sobolev signing in Russia today, perhaps this now influences the Habs to draft one of the stud D-men at #5...
Who is everyone's target for the Winnipeg pick?
Connelly for me.
That's because the Canes Owner Dundon told his staff to never draft a Dman with their first draft pick
Who is everyone's target for the Winnipeg pick?
Connelly for me.
Isnt he like racist or whatever the f***?
jett luchanko
It was one incident with Mailloux. It’s multiple with Connelly.is Mailloux a sexual predator? Young people make mistakes and unfortunates behaviors, We must be careful not to label them too quickly. Connely still on Foley's (Recruites) top 5 list, which is too much but give you an idea that you just cannot put this guy out of equation. Connelly is a skilled playmaker who shows flashes of being a difference maker without realy needing nobody to make it happens. we need some of that too
It was one incident with Mailloux. It’s multiple with Connelly.
Also this management didn’t draft Mailloux, so your point is moot.
Okay then I wouldn’t draft him on the sole basis of his idiotic and senseless head hunting he did in the U18 final which cost his team the gold medal. Stupid and selfish play from a stupid and selfish player.I would prefer to use "couple" than "multiple"... and for what we can know, after a hearing with the CAHA, it was determined no violation occurred for the in ice one.
... and my point isnt about management
Sure - only if you are willing to scoop up the poop from peoples bags.I would prefer to use "couple" than "multiple"... and for what we can know, after a hearing with the CAHA, it was determined no violation occurred for the in ice one.
... and my point isnt about management
is Mailloux a sexual predator? Young people make mistakes and unfortunates behaviors, We must be careful not to label them too quickly. Connely still on Foley's (Recruites) top 5 list, which is too much but give you an idea that you just cannot put this guy out of equation. Connelly is a skilled playmaker who shows flashes of being a difference maker without realy needing nobody to make it happens. we need some of that too
Looking like a player is ‘’involved’’ doesn’t mean they are more than the player who does the same thing but more effortlessly and doesn’t look like they’re as intense as the other player.
Gallagher looks more intense than Suzuki, does it means he accomplish more?
Have you watched him?Don't check now, but it pretty much translated into their respective statline as well.
At some point you'd think this fanbase would have had enough of the longshots and would stop being wowed by the shiny new toy who scores a couple of highlight reel goals.
I guess not.
View attachment 875660
I know stats are not the be all end all. But these are not the stats of someone who had the success OR progression to warrant being picked #5 overall.
So you have to look at the guy actually playing the game. And then you notice his engagement is erratic, that he plays a very raw game, and that you're pretty much banking all of it on him "not having grown properly into his body yet".
I'm sorry, this just a recipe for disaster.
You post about progression but completely ignore the drastic difference between his first and second half of the season.Don't check now, but it pretty much translated into their respective statline as well.
At some point you'd think this fanbase would have had enough of the longshots and would stop being wowed by the shiny new toy who scores a couple of highlight reel goals.
I guess not.
View attachment 875660
I know stats are not the be all end all. But these are not the stats of someone who had the success OR progression to warrant being picked #5 overall.
So you have to look at the guy actually playing the game. And then you notice his engagement is erratic, that he plays a very raw game, and that you're pretty much banking all of it on him "not having grown properly into his body yet".
I'm sorry, this just a recipe for disaster.
Too many people sleeping on Catton
View attachment 875636
He's an animal honestly. He's a bit of a know, but in a good way.What's the deal with Surin?
I love Poirier too... he's not gonna be there for our 2nd.I know, I’m just a Stan and partial to that value/cost of his goal scoring skills. Short kings never have the benefit of the doubt, I mean Logan Stankoven went comfortably in the second round…. And he was electric.
My big point of fandom on Poirier is his strength. It’s a sight to see. That shot arsenal and the dog in him get my blood pumping. But again I’m partial to the guy, I’m too big of a fan to have honest input. I would’ve thrown the kitchen sink at Hutson at the Mesar pick so I have the wind in my sails with short kings
Too many people sleeping on Catton
View attachment 875636
Picking Helenius would create a solid meltdown imo.. But theres not much talk about him at 5I think going with a forward, any forward, will prevent that.
Lindstrom Iggy Sennecke Catton, all will be welcomed with open arms.
President of Hockey Ops not GM - he will name a GMOr the first 4 picks are forwards, which is a possibility.
On a related note, Waddell is going to be the new GM in Columbus and this has incidence on the Habs pick.
Me either lolI’m not even letting myself entertain the possibility of Demidov…