BergevinBurner
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2019
- 1,818
- 4,258
Only a few more day until our 769 pages of pointless bickering on who to take becomes a thing of the past. Then we can bicker about how we f***ed up/aced the draft
Good thing is that barring they make an out of the field pick like Helenius, a good amount of poster will be satisfied with the pick.Only a few more day until our 769 pages of pointless bickering on who to take becomes a thing of the past. Then we can bicker about how we f***ed up/aced the draft
Small puck dominant players rarely do even if you mentioned the exceptions. Also Marner isn't small, he's 6'0 180 lbs.
Barzal was 5'11 1/4 grew to 6'1.Not small Marner was 5’11”, 160 lbs at the combine.
Small Catton was 5’10”, 175lbs.
Not small Marner was 5’11”, 160 lbs at the combine.
Small Catton was 5’10”, 175lbs.
Only a few more day until our 769 pages of pointless bickering on who to take becomes a thing of the past. Then we can bicker about how we f***ed up/aced the draft
Tiers are subjective. I would hope that the habs management have more viewings and interviews that provide some insight as to where the players stand.I was dispointed when we didn't take Michkov last year. But I understood it. RD stud who can bolster the roster and they felt high on him. Cool.
If they somehow got Levshunov, I'd understand it again. RD. Highest ranked in the draft... okay.
But guys who are in the same tier as the forwards and on the left side? Yeah, I'd be pissed.
Tennis boys goated
Golfers straight to the DND. Catton day is over.
Eiserman lmao
Cellebrini is in a different tier. Most can agree on that. Let's say we had the first overall and he was an LD. Fine, I get taking him. You HAVE to do that.Tiers are subjective. I would hope that the habs management have more viewings and interviews that provide some insight as to where the players stand.
No one can perfectly predict physical growth or progression, so it’ll be pretty hard to judge after the fact. I expect the habs will be looking at specific skills and possibilities, though. If the players are not too different they’ll take the best fit. If they think a guy has more potential they have to go for it.
Eiserman reaaaaalllllyyyyyy rubs me the wrong way. DND list.Yakemchuk is a freakin athlete
So you say he’ll top out at Marner’s size (very conservative projection). …. And yet, you wrote that Marner “isn’t small” while Catton will be “small” - even though they’ll end up being the same size. Got it.Not all weight is equal. Also I never argued that Marner was never small. ALSO bringing Marner up in the first place was a major L as he's notoriously a playoff flopper. Catton will probably top out around Marner size but it still won't allow him to dominate the middle come playoff time. His whole game relies on pick dominance which won't translate as well as someone like Iginla
Creepy level of stupid. Too much amount.Who would have guessed it... Cole Eiserman's favorite tennis player??? "Cole Eiserman."
Eiserman has the same agent as Wright, I see.Creepy level of stupid. Too much amount.
Eiserman reaaaaalllllyyyyyy rubs me the wrong way. DND list.
Creepy level of stupid. Too much amount.
I'm not high to the point of Demidov but I agree with the rest, and even if Demidov was still there, I wouldn't be mad at all, not unlike Benson/Michkov and Reinbacher last year.I know I'm in the minority, but I like Iginla to the point where I wouldn't mind it at all if they end up picking him even with Demidov, Lindstrom, Sennecke and Bauim all still on the board by some miracle. I'm that high on the kid.
I know I'm in the minority, but I like Iginla to the point where I wouldn't mind it at all if they end up picking him even with Demidov, Lindstrom, Sennecke and Bauim all still on the board by some miracle. I'm that high on the kid.
I know I'm in the minority, but I like Iginla to the point where I wouldn't mind it at all if they end up picking him even with Demidov, Lindstrom, Sennecke and Buium all still on the board by some miracle. I'm that high on the kid.
I'm not saying I'd absolutely pick him in that scenario, but I wouldn't be mad at all if they did.I'm not high to the point of Demidov but I agree with the rest, and even if Demidov was still there, I wouldn't be mad at all, not unlike Benson/Michkov and Reinbacher last year.
I’d give it a pass but he already struck out by speaking about himself in the third person….It was clearly a joke, though.
There's no Michkov in this draft.Well he would play in our top 6 rather sooner than later and would bring scoring, intangibles and leadership. He is certainly a strong, strong fit.
I just think we may pick him at the detriment of a player a good tier above at 5.
We made a meltdown for Reinbacher last year who was an awesome fit and rare top RD because we picked him at the detriment of a player who had superstar upside.