HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.
So you believe that Kent Hughes has let the local beat reporter in on the most carefully guarded organizational information????

Come on buddy, I don't know what is going on with you but you are smarter than this.
Actually, he probably did…..to throw everyone off……as Pacino once said, never let them see you coming
 
Gut feeling top 15 2024 draft prediction:

1. San Jose - Macklin Celibrini
2. Chicago - Artyom Levshunov
3. Anaheim - Anton Silayev
4. Columbus - Cayden Lidstrom
5. Montreal - Tij Iginla
6. Utah - Ivan Demidov
7. Ottawa - Zeev Buium
8. Seattle - Sam Dickinson
9. Calgary - Berkly Catton
10. New Jersey - Carter Yakemchuk
11. Buffalo - Beckett Sennecke
12. Philadelphia - Cole Eiserman
13. Minnesota - Zayne Parekh
14. San Jose - Konsta Helenius
15. Detroit - Michael Hage

Feel free to applaud or shit on it.

I am gonna do both......kind of like a Blumpkin's more polite cousin lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
Habs fan will riot if they pick Buium. That name sounds just like Bouillon. Imagine picking Bouillon over Demidov. On the plus side, it might help Carey remember his name this time.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: No More Subban
The money line means more to me than any publicly available rankings. You'd be foolish to think there's not people in the know who are making a pretty penny off this.

They don't have anybody "in the know" lol

They are looking at public rankings to determine where the money will be placed.....how is this not obvious to you? Do you actually believe that they employ actual scouts????

The public sites are nonsense as well as the betting lines. The betting lines are perhaps a more accurate reflection of the overall consensus on the public sites but that is all that it is. You would be foolish to think otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
I'm one of the biggest pessimists when it comes to the Habs and their decision making but I think there is some overreaction here to the Arpon Basu article. He mentions multiple times that this is just a hypothetical scenario and he could have easily used a different set of forwards and defenceman for the same analysis. He also has the disclaimer early on that he truly doesn't know where the Canadiens stand on either Demidov or Buium, or who they would take in this scenario.

That is not the vibe I'm getting from the article. I'm usually as loyal as it gets towards the front office, but one can smell a PR job from miles away, no matter how many disclaimers Arpon gives.

At the end of the day, it's their call. If they believe they're getting a unique talent in Buium and can address our needs up front in some other ways, be my guest. But people have every right to hold them accountable if it all goes tits up.
 
I just don't see any sensible similarity between Buium and Hutson, except for the fact they both are offensive Ds.

Hutson is an highlight reel machine. He's a waterbug out there and is more of a puck carrier than a pure puck mover. Which leaves me hesitant as to what his actual upside is in the show.

Buium is more of a quarterback and a puck mover. He's going to be using his teammates a lot more. He's very good at seeing patterns and using his teammates for give-and-gos both in the defensive and offensive zone. He's a bit smaller than I would prefer him to be but there's actual #1 D upside there.

I'd be really excited if we drafted him. I just don't see a lot of guys in our current D prospects pool who are going to be able to man a PP excluding Hutson anyway.

Mailloux might be there for his shot, but as far as puck distribution goes I just don't see it.
 
I'd take buium over guhle pretty easily

Guhle has gotten overrated around here to the point it's comical seriously.

No shit he's playing 20+ minutes a game. We suck. We finished bottom 5 in the league two years in a row.

He's a nice piece but far from being the untouchable player some fans make him out to be.

He's a very good player. That's not what I'm contesting. But he's the kind of very good player teams trade to get their hands on a player that fills a need.

Then you take the injury proneness into consideration and there's no question he should actually be in play.
 
Last edited:
I just don't see any sensible similarity between Buium and Hutson, except for the fact they both are offensive Ds.

Hutson is an highlight reel machine. He's a waterbug out there and is more of a puck carrier than a pure puck mover. Which leaves me hesitant as to what his actual upside is in the show.

Buium is more of a quarterback and a puck mover. He's going to be using his teammates a lot more. He's very good at seeing patterns and using his teammates for give-and-gos both in the defensive and offensive zone. He's a bit smaller than I would prefer him to be but there's actual #1 D upside there.

I'd be really excited if we drafted him. I just don't see a lot of guys in our current D prospects pool who are going to be able to man a PP excluding Hutson anyway.

Mailloux might be there for his shot, but as far as puck distribution goes I just don't see it.
The first comparaisons between Buium and Hutson happened like early next year when Buium was showing offensive potential but he was also 5'10

The way he handles the puck while on his stick is the only other comp, I think Hutson has a bit more flashiness while Buium has a bit more of a safe approach but both are very creative.

There's a big difference between them, Buium to me is everything you want in a top end D other than maybe an extra inch and a half to hit 6'2.

I also don't think having Hutson in the lineup is a dead sentence on Buium's PP time, I'd wager against that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kents polished head
I'd take buium over guhle pretty easily
In a vacuum you could very well be right, I’ll concede that.

What I’ll counter you with is this; it sets your development back 3 years. We are actually counting on Guhle because of his age and progress. He’s the “vet” of the new crop, and you are aware that D’s take longer to blossom.

It sets our d squad back too much for my liking. So if Carolina wants Matheson for example I’m good with your trade. But not Guhle. Buium and Guhle could co-exist, I’m not disputing that, I’m only reticent on the back peddling in the formation of our D squad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lafleurs Guy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad