BergevinBurner
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2019
- 1,893
- 4,427
Demidov is headed there with his finest platform shoes and a large intestine that hasn't been emptied in days.
He's going to ace the height/weight measurements!
Demidov is headed there with his finest platform shoes and a large intestine that hasn't been emptied in days.
Too early to contemplate trading Reinbacher - or any of Guhle, Struble, WiFi, Hutson, etc etc.What if...
Habs use Reinbacher in a deal
Then at 5 draft a d man?
I'd pick Catton if I was Don.Laine is going to be traded. Johnson seems to be busting. Texier is an average 3rd line forward, who's a winger. Marchenko is a good 2nd line goal scorer, and a winger. Chinakov is a winger.
Gaudreau winger. Sillinger looks to be a decent 2nd line center. Fantilli looks to be a winger at NHL level, too.
If they think Lindstrom can be a center, you take him based off that fact alone. Their #1 center is Boone Jenner.
Yeah a good way to improve an NHL team is by building them up with players from a middling KHL teamMan it would be great Silayev-Bogdan together in MTL
Then draft Artmanov from Torpedo ... these guys would rock
Hutson-Reinbacher
Silayev-Bodgan
Guhle-Mailloux
Wifi-Struble-Engstrom
SwaaaaayzeeeAverage Habs enjoyer.
It's interesting that management brought him out to dinner though, could there be a scenario where we take him with the plan of moving Guhle to the right side?
I know it's too early to tell, but a d-core of:
Hutson-Reinbacher
Dickinson-Guhle
Xhekaj-Mailloux
has the potential to be something special. The only downside is we'll need Hutson to score atleast 100 goals a season to makeup for the lack of offense up front
Would any girl even date him at that height? Cast him in the next Hobbit movie already, what a dweebDo you guys still pick Demidov if he's 5'10¾?
Laine is going to be traded. Johnson seems to be busting. Texier is an average 3rd line forward, who's a winger. Marchenko is a good 2nd line goal scorer, and a winger. Chinakov is a winger.
Gaudreau winger. Sillinger looks to be a decent 2nd line center. Fantilli looks to be a winger at NHL level, too.
If they think Lindstrom can be a center, you take him based off that fact alone. Their #1 center is Boone Jenner.
I'd happily grab Voronkov but he's not going anywhere (hopefully we start throwing darts at players like that in the later rounds instead of guys like Pitlick or Guindon)
Or when we pass on him for Sennecke and in 3 years he's putting up 50 goal seasons and Sennecke's putting up 50 point seasons.It’s gonna be awesome when we draft Eiserman at 5th and all y’all melt down.
If a player is on a good team, you can adjust their point totals downwards, all the way to 0. Only point totals on the worst team count. But in that case is the guy an individual player? Why's he getting so many points on a garbage team? The only conclusion can be that we shouldn't draft players who get points.
A decade of darkness.Some of you need therapy from how bad Bergevin hurt you
I think Sennecke-Suzuki would end like Barkov-Huberdeau. Although I think Sennecke will be even better the Huberdeau.I probably wouldn't be mad at taking Sennecke @ 5 but I'd be somewhat disappointed since I'd prefer Iginla over him if Demidov and Lindstrom both go top 4. Give me the bloodline kid over the tall lanky late riser kid this time around but I do think that Sennecke will be the Habs pick @ 5 this year if both Demidov and Lindstrom go top 4 but we'll see since lots can happen depending on who goes top 4 in this seemingly unpredictible draft.
Don’t think either of those player are that level. Suzuki is not Barkov that I’m 100 %sureI think Sennecke-Suzuki would end like Barkov-Huberdeau. Although I think Sennecke will be even better the Huberdeau.
Yeah and the Andreas Dackell era was a hoot.A decade of darkness.
We lost at least one cup because of him.
On a winning team with equivalent supporting cast he is not that far...Don’t think either of those player are that level. Suzuki is not Barkov that I’m 100 %sure
On a winning team with equivalent supporting cast he is not that far...
The Andreas Dackell era didn't have Price, Subban, Max, Markov and a 3rd overall to kick start a rebuild. Our incompetent GM did.Yeah and the Andreas Dackell era was a hoot.
the fact that Gorton/Hughes were the first to do proper analytics in Montreal is a crime. How can one of the oldest, richest teams not be doing best practice in their ops? We've had endless dinosaurs and old boys clubs, and this is the first time the management seems truly modern and forward-thinkingThe Andreas Dackell era didn't have Price, Subban, Max, Markov and a 3rd overall to kick start a rebuild. Our incompetent GM did.
Day one: Hires Michel Therrien.
Thank God the new regime seems to know what it's doing. So far so good. At a minimum we've picked a direction.
I started going 6 months after he left, thought I would bounce back to my old self but stayed down. The therapist told me that thinking about him running coffee for the boys in LA might make me happy for a while, it would wear off. It did so now I wore a rubber band around my wrist and snapped myself every time I had a nasty thought about the man. Three wrist infections later I realized I needed more, so I drown my sorrows in chocolate milk with cream soda chasers. Hard on the guts but keeps my mind off of him....Some of you need therapy from how bad Bergevin hurt you