HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Shutdown

Registered User
Sep 7, 2009
1,707
811
Montreal
Pronman's latest mock:

1. Celebrini
2. Levshunov
3. Silayev
4. Lindstrom
5. Demidov

We get Julius Miettinen with our WPG 1st.
i do for some reason feel it in my bones that Columbus is going Lindstrom - gotta hope the other two take a D. would love to inject Demidov's skill into this team.



any WHL watchers got a read on Miettinen if that's the guy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Totonada

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,548
106,937
Halifax
i do for some reason feel it in my bones that Columbus is going Lindstrom - gotta hope the other two take a D. would love to inject Demidov's skill into this team.



any WHL watchers got a read on Miettinen if that's the guy?

Highly competitive, smart player, has some physicality to him.. the offense isn't high end but he's got some tools, a plus shot, above average playmaking, isn't overly creative.. your typical finnish center.
 

MON4NHLTOR4MLB

Registered User
Oct 3, 2019
1,335
1,770
I can’t see Columbus passing up Demidov unless Chicago and Anaheim somehow, some way, go D and Columbus prefers the C. If we got Demidov it would be unbelievable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ozmodiar

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,518
4,691
I can’t see Columbus passing up Demidov unless Chicago and Anaheim somehow, some way, go D and Columbus prefers the C. If we got Demidov it would be unbelievable
I wouldn't be surprised if Columbus wanted to go Lindstrom. Him and Fantilli would be pretty good building blocks together (even if I don't see Lindstrom at C, they might).
 

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,250
6,808
Toronto / North York
Why is that?

Because he's the last thing we need to win a cup.

If we have another pick at 15 and he's still there, sure. I like him quite a bit, but not for the Habs. You can't have Caufield AND Catton. It's one or the other. Plus, we have Newhook, which is in the same format as well. Suzuki isn't giant either; we have to take that into account. If Suzuki was as big as Barkov/Drai, it would be a different story.

Look at the top 8 teams in the NHL, they don't have a collection of these players.

No more than 1 undersized, with no physical dimension, and "not fast" player in the top 6 or bust.

Obviously, Demidov is the target here:

Necas(or another trade) - Suzuki - Slafkovski
Caufield - Dach - Demidov/Lindstrom/Iginla/Sennecke.
Roy - Newhook - Mesar
Evans- Beck -Gallagher
 
Last edited:

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,518
4,691
Because he's the last thing we need.

If we have another pick at 15 and he's still there, sure. I like him quite a bit, but not for the Habs. You can't have Caufield AND Catton. It's one or the other. Plus we have NewHook who is in the same format as well.

Look at the top 8 teams in the NHL, they don't have a collection of these players.
I'm pretty sure Catton would be just fine on a line with Dach and Roy.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,128
12,482
Because he's the last thing we need.

If we have another pick at 15 and he's still there, sure. I like him quite a bit, but not for the Habs. You can't have Caufield AND Catton. It's one or the other. Plus we have NewHook who is in the same format as well.

Look at the top 8 teams in the NHL, they don't have a collection of these players.
Would you agree that we shouldn't base our drafting decisions off the presence of Alex fkn Newhook?

Catton's upside is what matters. If the top6 has to be re-shuffled, then so be it. Purposefully not drafting a super-skilled and super effective player because we have Alex Newhook on the roster is ridiculous.
 

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,518
4,691
Would you agree that we shouldn't base our drafting decisions off the presence of Alex fkn Newhook?

Catton's upside is what matters. If the top6 has to be re-shuffled, then so be it. Purposefully not drafting a super-skilled and super effective player because we have Alex Newhook on the roster is ridiculous.
Flashbacks to Pierre losing his mind when we drafted Price because we had Theodore, Huet, and Danis lmao
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,128
12,482
Flashbacks to Pierre losing his mind when we drafted Price because we had Theodore, Huet, and Danis lmao
Oh man, I remember that!! Exactly so, great reference.

Nikita Kucherov is listed at 5'11" 182 lbs... Berkely Catton is listed (pre-combine) at 5'10 175 lbs according to that TVA interview... but we can't consider him because we have Alex Newhook on the roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SannywithoutCompy

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,250
6,808
Toronto / North York
Would you agree that we shouldn't base our drafting decisions off the presence of Alex fkn Newhook?

Catton's upside is what matters. If the top6 has to be re-shuffled, then so be it. Purposefully not drafting a super-skilled and super effective player because we have Alex Newhook on the roster is ridiculous.

There's 10 players better than Catton in this draft on a BPA basis. Of course, I'm not basing anything on Newhook being there, but we have a limited window to form a team that will unlock the next level, and in that window, you absolutely cannot draft a role you already have repeatedly without that window dissolving. Catton will take 3 years to arrive.

I'm pretty sure Catton would be just fine on a line with Dach and Roy.

Fine ain't what we are looking for. Fine = losing.
We are done with fine. Fine is not winning since 1993.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,128
12,482
There's 10 players better than Catton in this draft on a BPA basis. Of course, I'm not basing anything on Newhook being there, but we have a limited window to form a team that will unlock the next level, and in that window, you absolutely cannot draft a role you already have repeatedly without that window dissolving. Catton will take 3 years to arrive.
Discounting the four that will be picked ahead of our pick, that leaves Catton as one of six options in a wide open field. Take away the LDs and that leaves Catton as a viable option.

I fully agree that we need to draft for our reality as an organization but any player drafted 5OA 2024 will take at least two years to arrive and three to be relied on. Seems like it's unfair to say Catton's too far away while you covet Demidov or whoever. I like all of them, mind you, I'm just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad