- Apr 25, 2006
- 50,801
- 54,640
Catton listed at 5'10 pre-measurement. I'm curious to see what the real numbers are.Is this official measurements or ones provided before combine?
Catton listed at 5'10 pre-measurement. I'm curious to see what the real numbers are.Is this official measurements or ones provided before combine?
I'm not necessarily talking about floors. I'm talking about the likelihood of being a weapon in the playoffs. If the top 12 or 15 guys hit their absolute ceilings, I think they're stars, including Lindstrom. I just happen to think that Lindstrom is more likely to be a weapon in the playoffs regardless of his outcome.You think he has a high floor. That's perfectly fair. I don't believe we should consider floor when looking at a top5 pick but we could disagree on that. I think a team like ours should swing for the highest upside as often as possible and I don't think we need to depict scenarios where our top5 draft pick turns out to be the next Philip Danault as an argument in favour of that player.
What yall think of EJ Emery? Could be there for our 26th.
I think it’s hopium to think we can get Demidov but would be cool if the stars align for it.
No hands, definitely not take him in first roundWhat yall think of EJ Emery? Could be there for our 26th.
No thanks, need some semblance of offensive upside. We've got Struble already.What yall think of EJ Emery? Could be there for our 26th.
I don’t know how advanced NFL drafting methodology is vs the NHL, but on average, the NFL is drafting 22 year olds where a significant number has the ability to step into an NFL roster immediately.
The NHL on the other hand, is drafting 18-20 year olds and the vast majority require development.
It’s just so much more difficult to project an 18 year old vs a 22 year old draftee, which probably explains in large part why NHL drafts are less efficient than the NFL.
Plus, watching the NFL draft this year, I’ve heard time and again how a team can win a draft via its picks in the 3-7th rounds, which explains how several NFL teams chose to trade down in exchange for extra later picks. That strategy would likely backfire in the NHL, where the chances of landing a viable player decrease significantly the further away you get from the 1st-2nd round.
Best way to succeed in an NHL draft is to have advanced scouting tools (competent analytics) and the best talent evaluators you can get. Some scouts and scouting directors have a better track record than others and prying those away is huge but difficult to do.
He's definitely not an offensive minded D for sure. He's a big meanie though.No thanks, need some semblance of offensive upside. We've got Struble already.
This is very well said. I’m on the Lindstrom bandwagon as well.I'm not necessarily talking about floors. I'm talking about the likelihood of being a weapon in the playoffs. If the top 12 or 15 guys hit their absolute ceilings, I think they're stars, including Lindstrom. I just happen to think that Lindstrom is more likely to be a weapon in the playoffs regardless of his outcome.
If he maxes out, he's what, a ppg+ physically dominant centre who absolutely no one looks forward to going up against? You can dream on him. But he's not the only guy you can dream on at the top of the draft. But what if he reaches 90% of his potential? Or 80, 70, 60, 50%? I think Lindstrom would still be a problem in the playoffs and I don't think the others would be.
Note that I'm not even necessarily advocating drafting him. I'm just applying a different lens.
He is, and if he turned out as good as Struble I'd rather have him since he's a righty, but I think he'd be redundant and not worth the opportunity cost of a potential top 6/9 forward we could get at 26He's definitely not an offensive minded D for sure. He's a big meanie though.
I wouldn't put the chances of getting a top 6 forward very high at 26. Maybe some centers if they're given space to develop.He is, and if he turned out as good as Struble I'd rather have him since he's a righty, but I think he'd be redundant and not worth the opportunity cost of a potential top 6/9 forward we could get at 26
Buium will be the best D from this draft imoIf both Demidov and Lundstrom are gone when #5 comes along I simply.draft Dickinson or Buium.
If Guhle is the ask for any Defense for Forward trade, then trade Guhle get your top 6 forward and Dicky or Boom will be ready in 2 years when we start competing
They might not be ready. They might just be starting out in the NHL. They might never become as good as Guhle will be. It often takes a dman 200 NHL games before you know what you've got.If both Demidov and Lundstrom are gone when #5 comes along I simply.draft Dickinson or Buium.
If Guhle is the ask for any Defense for Forward trade, then trade Guhle get your top 6 forward and Dicky or Boom will be ready in 2 years when we start competing
Agreed the chances aren't high, but I'd rather roll the dice on that than a likely #6.I wouldn't put the chances of getting a top 6 forward very high at 26. Maybe some centers if they're given space to develop.
He does come off very calm and in control. Mature kid.
Good looking kid…..he’s got a good frame too, he’s easily gonna be 220. So many things to like, wouldn’t be surprised if Chicago selected him at 2 overall.He does come off very calm and in control. Mature kid.
It’s an imitation league, no doubt.NHL teams always try to copy whatever is working at the moment and rn if you want to fight a team like Florida you go Lindstrom.
I’m 100% he’s not making it to us now.
Yeah idk. I don’t see Guhle’s potential as crazy high, especially offensively. He might progress and top out as a 30-40 point D, but I seriously doubt anything more than that. Defensively, he’s probably near his ceiling already - he’s already very good and plays on a shit team. The question is how much more room he has to improve offensively, like I said.They might not be ready. They might just be starting out in the NHL. They might never become as good as Guhle will be. It often takes a dman 200 NHL games before you know what you've got.
I love your username by the way!
Dude...he's 22 years old and he's been playing against opponents top lines at the NHL level. He's 4-5 years away from his prime. A lot of strong D aren't even in the NHL at his age. He's going to be a very good dman.Yeah idk. I don’t see Guhle’s potential as crazy high, especially offensively. He might progress and top out as a 30-40 point D, but I seriously doubt anything more than that. Defensively, he’s probably near his ceiling already - he’s already very good and plays on a shit team. The question is how much more room he has to improve offensively, like I said.
I’d take the gamble on all of Buium, Dickinson, Silayev, Levshunov, Yakemchuk, and possibly Parekh over keeping him, if we can trade him for a good young forward. All the top D in this draft have higher potential than Guhle, imo. And before you say anything, keep in mind I’m not saying all of them will for sure become better than Guhle - two different statements.