HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Michoulicious

Registered User
Dec 9, 2014
7,518
8,261
To anyone watching BOS-TOR right now..

This is kinda why we need a Lindstrom (if he has a clean bill of health).

Playoffs are a different beast, and he seems like a perfect fit.
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.

We'll see, but for the forwards only Lindstrom fits the profile in the top 10. Dickinson, Levshunov and Silayev for the Ds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: River Meadow

River Meadow

Registered User
Mar 29, 2016
7,004
9,391
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.

We'll see, but for the forwards only Lindstrom fits the profile in the top 10. Dickinson, Levshunov and Silayev for the Ds.

Agreed.

I think the thought behind Newhook is that his speed makes up for lack of size.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,428
25,801
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.

We'll see, but for the forwards only Lindstrom fits the profile in the top 10. Dickinson, Levshunov and Silayev for the Ds.

Iginla I think also brings size and grit.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,790
10,758
Nova Scotia
I’ve heard the opposite. I heard Lindstrom has the tools but maybe lacks the IQ relying too much on said tools
Injuries worry me too much on Lindstrom. If I have chance at Catton I am taking it. If all 3 top forwards are gone I am taking right D. Or, If return is huge on Guhle I may trade him for core forward and pick Dickinson. Part because I am exceptionally high on Dickinson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crosbyshow

FrankMTL

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
12,556
14,509
Anyhow, I haven't been tampering with it in a few weeks because Im finishing up my bachelors right now and I haven't had much time to myself but :

View attachment 856214

That 5-8 group of forwards is really close in my opinion. I'm hoping that Iginla goes to the U18's as otherwise the only one we have to still see (and potentially raise his stock) is Helenius. Curious to see how Eiserman's game has evolved (or not) as he already dominated the U18's last year.
 

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,253
6,814
Toronto / North York
Philly took Mitchkov last year. They've already got one.

And we've got Hutson... it's why we won't take Buium. Gotta say though, I'd love to take Buium. But we need a forward badly.

Even if you have Mitchkov, you draft Demidov, different players - same line. Hell, add Ryabkin next year, and you have a trio.

Buium is the one D I would make an exception for even if we need a forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CristianoRonaldo

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,855
50,307
Even if you have Mitchkov, you draft Demidov, different players - same line. Hell, add Ryabkin next year, and you have a trio.
Sure. Unless you need D.

There are some awesome blueliners in this draft. If you've got Mitchkov and need D, you go that way instead.

I think you also need a different dimension for your club. If you've got Michkov, it wouldn't be a bad idea to go with Lidstrom.
Buium is the one D I would make an exception for even if we need a forward.
He looks really good. I'd love to take him but we're so out of balance right now, it just doesn't make sense to do it when there are forwards that can really help us. And again, we've got Hutson who will serve the same role. There's only so much icetime.
 

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,253
6,814
Toronto / North York
Sure. Unless you need D.

There are some awesome blueliners in this draft. If you've got Mitchkov and need D, you go that way instead.

I think you also need a different dimension for your club. If you've got Michkov, it wouldn't be a bad idea to go with Lidstrom.

He looks really good. I'd love to take him but we're so out of balance right now, it just doesn't make sense to do it when there are forwards that can really help us. And again, we've got Hutson who will serve the same role. There's only so much icetime.

Sure that's Levshunov, and only Levshunov is in Demidov's tier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad