The Last Red
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2022
- 1,558
- 1,757
What are you, 21?Anyhow, I haven't been tampering with it in a few weeks because Im finishing up my bachelors right now
What are you, 21?Anyhow, I haven't been tampering with it in a few weeks because Im finishing up my bachelors right now
Twenty plus or minus ten years. I just decided I needed a lil change four years ago.What are you, 21?
One of these players should be available at 5th (assuming we stay where we are after the lottery).Celebrini
Demidov
Helenius
Lindstrom
No doubt, maybe 2 of them.One of these players should be available at 5th (assuming we stay where we are after the lottery).
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.To anyone watching BOS-TOR right now..
This is kinda why we need a Lindstrom (if he has a clean bill of health).
Playoffs are a different beast, and he seems like a perfect fit.
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.
We'll see, but for the forwards only Lindstrom fits the profile in the top 10. Dickinson, Levshunov and Silayev for the Ds.
2nd only to Silayev. I'd take him over every other defenseman given the choice. Buium would be a close 3rd.Where would you guys rank Reinbacher of last year among this years D group? 4th?
Levshunov?2nd only to Silayev. I'd take him over every other defenseman given the choice. Buium would be a close 3rd.
I prefer RB by a lot. Levshunov is still very raw. He has better tools than Reinbacher but Reinbacher already had a very solid foundation to his game. The chances Reinbacher hits his ceiling is a lot higher compared to Levshunov.Levshunov?
Anderson is gone this summer, it won't be an issueMost important decision incoming is Celebrini wore 71 in Boston and wore 17 with Team Canada, Evans and Anderson have them with us so does one of them give it up when we win the lottery or does he take a different number?
Them picking Demidov would be like us picking Buium. We’ve already got one.I doubt they'd pick Demidov at 2
I have a feeling that by the time we get to McKenzie's final ratings we will learn that there were at least 4 names at 2
Assuming they don't win the lottery and Lindstrom is available he's their pick, I'm convinced of that.Montreal will get Lindstrom. They will trade up if they have to.
Same here.2nd only to Silayev. I'd take him over every other defenseman given the choice. Buium would be a close 3rd.
I think Montreal's current management values size a lot high in the draft. Slaf, Reinbacher... 2 in 2 so far. They also traded for 6'3 Dach.... Newhook is small however.
We'll see, but for the forwards only Lindstrom fits the profile in the top 10. Dickinson, Levshunov and Silayev for the Ds.
Injuries worry me too much on Lindstrom. If I have chance at Catton I am taking it. If all 3 top forwards are gone I am taking right D. Or, If return is huge on Guhle I may trade him for core forward and pick Dickinson. Part because I am exceptionally high on Dickinson.I’ve heard the opposite. I heard Lindstrom has the tools but maybe lacks the IQ relying too much on said tools
Anyhow, I haven't been tampering with it in a few weeks because Im finishing up my bachelors right now and I haven't had much time to myself but :
View attachment 856214
Them picking Demidov would be like us picking Buium. We’ve already got one.
Philly took Mitchkov last year. They've already got one.We already have a Demidov? I don't get it, we don't have one at all.
Philly took Mitchkov last year. They've already got one.
And we've got Hutson... it's why we won't take Buium. Gotta say though, I'd love to take Buium. But we need a forward badly.
Sure. Unless you need D.Even if you have Mitchkov, you draft Demidov, different players - same line. Hell, add Ryabkin next year, and you have a trio.
He looks really good. I'd love to take him but we're so out of balance right now, it just doesn't make sense to do it when there are forwards that can really help us. And again, we've got Hutson who will serve the same role. There's only so much icetime.Buium is the one D I would make an exception for even if we need a forward.
Sure. Unless you need D.
There are some awesome blueliners in this draft. If you've got Mitchkov and need D, you go that way instead.
I think you also need a different dimension for your club. If you've got Michkov, it wouldn't be a bad idea to go with Lidstrom.
He looks really good. I'd love to take him but we're so out of balance right now, it just doesn't make sense to do it when there are forwards that can really help us. And again, we've got Hutson who will serve the same role. There's only so much icetime.