le_sean
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2006
- 42,051
- 45,263
Yeah they are red flags with a black symbol in the middle. That’s how much we need to stay away.There is zero chance we pick Connelly. Of that I'm 100% sure. Guy has red flags all over him.
Yeah they are red flags with a black symbol in the middle. That’s how much we need to stay away.There is zero chance we pick Connelly. Of that I'm 100% sure. Guy has red flags all over him.
@Naslund didn't say how to get them.I doubt MBN/Sennecke will be there at Winnipeg's pick.
I think there are teams that will pick BPA because they need everything, there are teams like us who would prefer a F and there are teams that should pick a D man everything else being equal. There should be a good F when we pick, what could upset that? If one of those D first teams wins the lottery and takes Celebrinni then there is probably one more F drafted before us that there would otherwise be.Pretty sure 3 Ds are being picked in the top 5. And if Habs are set on a Lindstrom or Iginla type player, one of them will definitely be there for us unless we pick 8OA.
There's no way Yakemchuk falls to anywhere close to the Winnipeg pick. I don't think Jiricek will either but he could be in trade-up range. NHL teams LOVE right shooting dmen with size and offensive production.Yakemchuk or Jiricek at jets pick would be a charm ...
I doubt MBN/Sennecke will be there at Winnipeg's pick.
I really hope we package that Winnipeg pick to try to move up and grab another one of the "top" forwards in this draft. If we could somehow walk away with 1 of Demidov/Catton/Lindstrom/Iginla and one of Eiserman/Helenius/Greentree/etc then that would do wonders in rounding out or future top 6.Would need for Winnipeg to lose a couple and fall behind Toronto and Edmonton (they're both 1 point back of Winnipeg, with Edmonton having a game in hand). That would give us potentially pick 23. After that we would just need the Jets to lose in one of the two first rounds and hope that Tampa faces Las Vegas in the finals and boom, pick number 21.
I really hope we package that Winnipeg pick to try to move up and grab another one of the "top" forwards in this draft. If we could somehow walk away with 1 of Demidov/Catton/Lindstrom/Iginla and one of Eiserman/Helenius/Greentree/etc then that would do wonders in rounding out or future top 6.
Outside of Suzuki, Slaf and Caufield our top 6 is full of question marks. I have no doubt Dach will be part of it IF he can stay healthy. Roy has potential, but I'm not fully sold on him yet. Newhook would ideally be a 3rd line guy going forward imo, and the rest of our forward prospect pool doesn't appear to have a sure fire top 6 talent as it stands.
You'd have to hope that one of the top forwards slides and becomes available somewhere between 17-20. Otherwise, it will be very pricey to move up and I wouldn't sacrifice the Calgary first rounder next season. Maybe hope that the Winnipeg first and a young dman (Barron or Harris more than likely) is enough to move up a few spots if they really have their eye on somebody.
I'd do that deal in a heartbeat if a team in that range was interested. We're at the point now where we need quality over quantity, especially up front.21-23 would have more value up front, so if the Habs could give up the Avs 2nd and their future 2nd to a team, they could likely get between 12-16.
I'd do that deal in a heartbeat if a team in that range was interested. We're at the point now where we need quality over quantity, especially up front.
Never heard this story before. But it's another case of the dangers of drafting based on need.
At the 2006 draft table, Andre Savard was vehemently arguing to take Giroux when he was available to us at 20th overall. Another person high up (not Timmins) was vehemently arguing for David Fischer. Gainey steped in and said, if you guys can't decide, take the big defenseman over the small forward. We have enough small forwards and not enough dmen.
Putting aside whether need should be a tie breaker, if it isn't the tie breaker don't do it!The way you describe it, it does not fit drafting by need. The need was the tie-breaker, which makes perfect sense.
Nah. The time is now to add to the current roster. I’d rather use that to get someone like Necas than someone that is 2-4 years away.I'd do that deal in a heartbeat if a team in that range was interested. We're at the point now where we need quality over quantity, especially up front.
Never heard this story before. But it's another case of the dangers of drafting based on need.
At the 2006 draft table, Andre Savard was vehemently arguing to take Giroux when he was available to us at 20th overall. Another person high up (not Timmins) was vehemently arguing for David Fischer. Gainey steped in and said, if you guys can't decide, take the big defenseman over the small forward. We have enough small forwards and not enough dmen.
IMO he's 100% going to be a center at the NHL level no matter which team picks him and he'll probably end up as the 1C on whatever team he goes to, except maybe Chicago or New Jersey if they win the lottery. I see him being similar to Toews, but with more of a goal scoring touch.In the eventuality that the Habs win the lottery and then most likely pick Celebrini, what kind of player is he?
What kind of game does he play, would he be a center or winger long term, is he a playmaker, scorer or more hybrid of a player?
I’m on that train!!Nah. The time is now to add to the current roster. I’d rather use that to get someone like Necas than someone that is 2-4 years away.
f*** he’s tenacious on that puckx.com
x.com
Look how he navigates in traffic and his board play. Jesus, he’s impressive. So strong already for his young age.
I dont know how this organisation would pass on him for Catton.
Hey, shut up. 15 seconds is complete acceptable. You act like 15 seconds isn't a long time and you and I are going to have an issue.So is Seravalli 15 seconds before the pick