- May 4, 2004
- 5,804
- 19,103
Man....he has Lindstrom at 9 and Catton at 15.
Imagine scoring Cayden with our pick, and somehow picking 18 with Jets and landing Catton.
I'd love to know how our management ranks the forwards at the top of the draft. I wonder how comfortable they feel with our center depth, if they're as nervous about it as I am then maybe their draft list is topped by Lindstrom and Helenius.
Yea, we don't have anything in the system that inspires confidence if Suzuki or Dach go down long term.They should not be comfortable with Dach at all, thus they should not be confident about the center depth. Remains to be seen how much offence Beck will actually have in the NHL as well, this might make him a 4th center rather than a 3rd.
Montreal has had more top pairing defensemen in a single season than 80 point scorers since 1997, I'd say they seem to be harder to acquire, at least for usI would be shocked if the top 6 picks werent filled with defensemen. A top pairing defenseman has to be one of the most difficult asset to acquire. Just ask any of the Canadian franchises.
I believe concensus right now is Eiserman is more likely to go outside the top 10 then in the top 3
Where is this consensus coming from? Elite prospect website has several rankings and their consolidated ranking for Eiserman is 11th. However, someone like Bob M has him 4th and even after considering his slip.
What is the context into why he is slipping? I have not watched him play one bit in the NCAA but his stats look solid. Especially his goals. He's fairly heavy for a 6'-0" 17 year old at 196 lbs. It is his skating and conditioning that is holding him back? Not sure.
He's one of the very few forwards after Celebrini who has size. Yeah, I get it, some think size don't matter anymore but that's not the normal trend of how teams target their picks...especially in the top 10.
High end D are often found later in drafts whereas top forwards are almost exclusively top picks.Fans draft forwards.
GMs draft defenseman.
High end D are often found later in drafts whereas top forwards are almost exclusively top picks.
I fully expect the top 10 to be primarily D, but i see those two gone in the top 5.
Or like how GMs picked Barret Hayton, Zadina and KK ahead of Hughes and Dobson.When scouts and GMs sit down and make their list, those defenseman will be higher than the forwards. It's how Nemec went ahead of Cooley and Wright. It's how Reinbacher was going 5 regardless who was picking there. It's how a Korchinski goes 10+ spots higher, just like Simashev and Wallinder.
Defenseman get helium in the draft and if there isn't a consensus among scouts that the forwards are a tier above the defenseman, generally the defenseman will go first.
I haven't watched a ton of him but lack of compete and non existence of a defensive game are the highlights personally I'd still take him if Catton Demidov and Lindstrom are all gone you can't teach the shot he has.Where is this consensus coming from? Elite prospect website has several rankings and their consolidated ranking for Eiserman is 11th. However, someone like Bob M has him 4th and even after considering his slip.
What is the context into why he is slipping? I have not watched him play one bit in the NCAA but his stats look solid. Especially his goals. He's fairly heavy for a 6'-0" 17 year old at 196 lbs. It is his skating and conditioning that is holding him back? Not sure.
He's one of the very few forwards after Celebrini who has size. Yeah, I get it, some think size don't matter anymore but that's not the normal trend of how teams target their picks...especially in the top 10.
The forwards have question marks too, that's why the Ds have been high on draft lists since the beginning of the season.Or like how GMs picked Barret Hayton, Zadina and KK ahead of Hughes and Dobson.
Sure i can imagine they value defensemen more in general, unless the team believes that forward is BPA (Demidov) or has unique size and position advantage (Lindstrom).
In this year's case, besides Levshunov and Dickinson, the other defensemen have question marks. (You could even argue the first two aren't surefire #1D either) so after those two are gone, the field is pretty open - that's where Demidov and Lindstrom probably slide in.
I don't think the same of the remaining forwards, they'll likely go after a run on D.
I enjoying hearing Snake revisit drafts.
Man was he ever good from 2 to 11 in the 2014 draft.
Man was he ever bad with his 1st overall pick.
It depends it just need one team to really love Parekh, Buuim or Silayev above the forwards. I think people really under estimate the question mark surounding Demidov (No live viewing, no international games and most importantly playing against very poor competition in the MHL for another year). Most scouts and draft ranking agreed that Michkov was the 2nd best talent of the draft but he still slipped to 7th overall. I believe Demidov will have a similar fate. I am not convinced that one team like Columbus or Chicago or Anaheim with how their team are build will be willing to go all in on Demidov. Most likely is San Jose as they are just at the beginning of their rebuild and might be ready to take that risk.Basically how i see it going;
2 to 5: Levshunov, and Dickinson are first Ds off the board. Demidov and Lindstrom follow
6 to 9: GMs take a run on D and grab Yakemchuk, Buuim, Parekh, Silayev
10 to 13: rest of the forwards in any order Catton, Helenius, Iginla, Eiserman
Or like how GMs picked Barret Hayton, Zadina and KK ahead of Hughes and Dobson.
Sure i can imagine they value defensemen more in general, unless the team believes that forward is BPA (Demidov) or has unique size and position advantage (Lindstrom). IE Montreal taking Slafkovsky, a winger no less, ahead of two great D prospects in Nemec and Jiricek.
In this year's case, besides Levshunov and Dickinson, the other defensemen have question marks. (You could even argue the first two aren't surefire #1D either) so after those two are gone, the field is pretty open - that's where Demidov and Lindstrom probably slide in.
I don't think the same of the remaining forwards, they'll likely go after a run on D.
Michkov was under contract for another 3 years, plus the talk of him forcing his way to Philly. Demidov didn't extend his deal with SKA so he can come over as soon as 2025-26. And he actually skates back to support his D.It depends it just need one team to really love Parekh, Buuim or Silayev above the forwards. I think people really under estimate the question mark surounding Demidov. Most scouts and draft ranking agreed that Michkov was the 2nd best talent of the draft but he still slipped to 7th overall. I believe Demidov will have a similar fate. I am not convinced that one team like Columbus or Chicago or Anaheim with how their team are build will be willing to go all in on Demidov.