HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,454
70,495
Toronto
What do you guys think of Justin Poirier with our 2nd/3rd round pick? Small yes, but he's a thick guy. 5'6 180lbs. Incredible goal scorer. Not a one trick pony, can score multiple ways. We already have Caufield who is undersized but Poirier would only be ready 3-4 years from now.

3rd round is ok. Specifically, Minnesota's pick.
 

Leto

Registered User
Feb 16, 2023
1,000
2,138
You also have to admire his honestly regarding his missed picks.

I always find he offers a really interesting perspective in general as well.

I used to find him somewhat insufferable. He has mellowed and he is more enjoyable to listen to.

I agree with the way he set his expectations regarding prospects and their rounds of selections. It contrasts with how fans and pundits have tendencies to overhype their own prospects.​
 

GlassesJacketShirt

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
11,681
4,722
Sherbrooke
You also have to admire his honestly regarding his missed picks.

I always find he offers a really interesting perspective in general as well.

I like Snake as well, though being on the same Marinaro podcast episode as McCagg really helped through contrast of their communicative styles.

And yeah, I find their segments when they look at past drafts to be most interesting, only wish they spent more time on it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Leto

JeffreyLFC

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
10,790
7,950
Michkov was under contract for another 3 years, plus the talk of him forcing his way to Philly. Demidov didn't extend his deal with SKA so he can come over as soon as 2025-26. And he actually skates back to support his D.

They're pretty different situations.

I hope the same but it's more wishful thinking. I don't deny the first part could happen.
It's not wishful thinking. It's the reality, Demidov is playing against junior B level of talent and most likely will do again next year. The NHL scouts have not watched him play at all in person only on video nor in international tournament. It might sound absurd to you but NHL scouts love watching players live especially head scout who have to decide between a lot of players in similar tier. Finally, the russian factor is often downplayed but we still don't know what will happen next year in Russia. Kent Hughes even addressed it last year by saying that not watching Michkov play in person was a factor in their decision to go with Reinbacher.

Overall, If I go logically for a team like Chicago or Columbus (with all the off ice issues they had) or Anaheim (who look pretty close to be in playoff contention) they will have to be 100% convinced that Demidov is him and that he will improve their team while having very special talent at defense available and ignoring them. NGL I feel this is the best year for defender that I have ever followed, even better than 2008, personally I think if you are a team that need a defender this is your year, you cannot mess up with the defender if you go for a forward you need to hit, you simply cannot miss.

I am not even convinced the Habs would go with Demidov, with everything Hughes has said prior regarding Michkov.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frank JT

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,862
12,769
Wow! Catton #15. Miettinen #17! Ha. Ha. I just said in CHL playoff thread he's ranked 2nd-3rd round, which he is on most lists. I'm not surprised he took a huge jump, but that's impressive. Ditto Fibigr & Vanacker. Huge jumps.
Look at the wealth of talent at forward that should (will) be available at the bottom of the first round. Imagine if Vanacker falls to us. Kid will be 30+ goal scorer for the next decade. And there will be other excellent options.

Don’t listen to the pundits who are dismissive of this draft. And why we shouldn't be giving away that Winnipeg first rounder because some are getting itchy for the quick fix.
 
Last edited:

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,454
70,495
Toronto
Look at the wealth of talent at forward that should (will) be available at the bottom of the first round. Imagine if Vanacker falls to us. Kid will be 30+ goal scorer for the next decade. And there will be other excellent options.

Don’t listen to the pundits who are dismissive of this draft. And why we don’t give away that Winnipeg first rounder because some are getting itchy for the quick fix.

Considering the year he's having, I'm surprised that he wasn't ranked higher. This is a good draft as far as getting physical, power forward types. One of the best ones in years. Lots of guys with some edge to their games.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,425
25,799
Look at the wealth of talent at forward that should (will) be available at the bottom of the first round. Imagine if Vanacker falls to us. Kid will be 30+ goal scorer for the next decade. And there will be other excellent options.

Don’t listen to the pundits who are dismissive of this draft. And why we don’t give away that Winnipeg first rounder because some are getting itchy for the quick fix.
And that Winnipeg 1st could still be in the early 20's. The Jets were sinking in the standings at the TDL, then went on a tear, and now are back to sinking, with red hot Nashville and Edmonton, plus Toronto threatening to overtake them. If Tampa and the Jets performed over the next 10 games as they did the last 10 games, Tampa would also pass them.

Will be an interesting final 12 games, and 1st and 2nd rounds, to follow.
 
Last edited:

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,862
12,769
Considering the year he's having, I'm surprised that he wasn't ranked higher. This is a good draft as far as getting physical, power forward types. One of the best ones in years. Lots of guys with some edge to their games.
In the ubiquitous mocks that were available at the start of the season and some that appeared at the end of the past calendar year, Vanacker was rated as a late second rounder. Anyone with a modicum of hockey knowledge could see that Vanacker possesses elite skating ability and dynamic offensive skills.

In fact, he’s one of the few players that I would aggressively move up for. Use our first pick on the best player available and the Avalanche second pick and the Winnipeg first pick to be in a position to draft a player like Vanacker or a number of other strong forwards who should be available between 15 OA and 20 OA.
 

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,454
70,495
Toronto
In the ubiquitous mocks that were available at the start of the season and some that appeared at the end of the past calendar year, Vanacker was rated as a late second rounder. Anyone with a modicum of hockey knowledge could see that Vanacker possesses elite skating ability and dynamic offensive skills.

In fact, he’s one of the few players that I would aggressively move up for. Use our first pick on the best player available and the Avalanche second pick and the Winnipeg first pick to be in a position to draft a player like Vanacker or a number of other strong forwards who should be available between 15 OA and 20 OA.

Yes, I've been saying for the last few days that instead of trading that Winnipeg pick, we should try to use it to trade up into 15-20 range.

Vanacker is still ranked late 2nd round on a lot of lists. I expect a move up on these end of season ones.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,862
12,769
Yes, I've been saying for the last few days that instead of trading that Winnipeg pick, we should try to use it to trade up into 15-20 range.

Vanacker is still ranked late 2nd round on a lot of lists. I expect a move up on these end of season ones.
I’m hoping our scouts when they are following up on Florian Xhejax’s development have taken note of Vanacker’s potential.

To me, a perfect (realistic) draft would be one of Yakemchuk/Dickinson/ Buium with our pick and one of either Vanacker / Luchanko with our ‘enhanced’ Winnipeg pick.

Talk about jump starting our re-build.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nevins

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
90,795
39,817
There's one forward I won't be excited to get. Helenius. I'd be fine with any of the rest, Lindstrom, Demidov, Catton, Iginla, Eiserman...there's just a reason why for eveyrone of them. Yet I believe that out of that list, Demidov and Catton brings so much more.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,062
45,290
I'd love to know how our management ranks the forwards at the top of the draft. I wonder how comfortable they feel with our center depth, if they're as nervous about it as I am then maybe their draft list is topped by Lindstrom and Helenius.
I think both are very capable of being wingers at the next level. They’d be good insurance if Dach turns out injury prone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BergevinBurner

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,968
44,766
www.youtube.com
You have all wrong on Artamonov.

He’s one of the smartest in the draft and his playmaking and compete are his very best attributs.

his compete has not looked very good in the MHL playoffs, I'm sure there's an adjustment after being in the KHL all year so maybe he's taking it a little easier as I didn't see him do this in the KHL but we'll see as the next series is about to start tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

JeffreyLFC

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
10,790
7,950
There's one forward I won't be excited to get. Helenius. I'd be fine with any of the rest, Lindstrom, Demidov, Catton, Iginla, Eiserman...there's just a reason why for eveyrone of them. Yet I believe that out of that list, Demidov and Catton brings so much more.
Me too, the Finnish hockey league level is not very good. He has high hockey IQ but man he is a very vanilla player. Nothing that standout as elite. I still think he will be a good NHL player but not the type to excite a fanbase. Which is also part of the reason why I think the habs will draft him.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,587
16,449
his compete has not looked very good in the MHL playoffs, I'm sure there's an adjustment after being in the KHL all year so maybe he's taking it a little easier as I didn't see him do this in the KHL but we'll see as the next series is about to start tomorrow.
I’m not really giving much importance about him in the MHL. His KHL season was very good!
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,062
45,290
Me too, the Finnish hockey league level is not very good. He has high hockey IQ but man he is a very vanilla player. Nothing that standout as elite. I still think he will be a good NHL player but not the type to excite a fanbase. Which is also part of the reason why I think the habs will draft him.
I have the same feeling when I watch him but then I remind myself that the Finnish league is just like that. It stifles creativity and offensive talent.
 

Toene

Y'en aura pas de facile
Nov 17, 2014
5,239
5,430
Why did Silayev drop from 2nd to 12th? He's still the same swift skating behemoth, isnt he?
 

HuGo Burner Acc

Registered User
Mar 30, 2016
4,702
5,334
Me too, the Finnish hockey league level is not very good. He has high hockey IQ but man he is a very vanilla player. Nothing that standout as elite. I still think he will be a good NHL player but not the type to excite a fanbase. Which is also part of the reason why I think the habs will draft him.

He's the Lars Eller of this draft
 

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,454
10,236
Moscow, Russia
It's not wishful thinking. It's the reality, Demidov is playing against junior B level of talent and most likely will do again next year. The NHL scouts have not watched him play at all in person only on video nor in international tournament. It might sound absurd to you but NHL scouts love watching players live especially head scout who have to decide between a lot of players in similar tier. Finally, the russian factor is often downplayed but we still don't know what will happen next year in Russia. Kent Hughes even addressed it last year by saying that not watching Michkov play in person was a factor in their decision to go with Reinbacher.

Overall, If I go logically for a team like Chicago or Columbus (with all the off ice issues they had) or Anaheim (who look pretty close to be in playoff contention) they will have to be 100% convinced that Demidov is him and that he will improve their team while having very special talent at defense available and ignoring them. NGL I feel this is the best year for defender that I have ever followed, even better than 2008, personally I think if you are a team that need a defender this is your year, you cannot mess up with the defender if you go for a forward you need to hit, you simply cannot miss.

I am not even convinced the Habs would go with Demidov, with everything Hughes has said prior regarding Michkov.

Yeah, but somehow those "B level juniors" regularly beat CHLers in the past...
 

TheBuriedHab

Registered User
Jan 27, 2010
8,387
4,358
I keep hearing Gorton talk about how the Habs are cognizant of how hard it is to add skill.

Leads me to believe Eiserman is going to be the pick. He's also going to BU next year, the Habs management love that program.

Habs were in 38 games decided by 1 goal this year. They want more goals, Eiserman does that.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,145
13,715
I keep hearing Gorton talk about how the Habs are cognizant of how hard it is to add skill.

Leads me to believe Eiserman is going to be the pick. He's also going to BU next year, the Habs management love that program.

Habs were in 38 games decided by 1 goal this year. They want more goals, Eiserman does that.

Eiserman will be a hallehuaj pick for sure. He have soo much potential.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,645
107,257
Halifax
I keep hearing Gorton talk about how the Habs are cognizant of how hard it is to add skill.

Leads me to believe Eiserman is going to be the pick. He's also going to BU next year, the Habs management love that program.

Habs were in 38 games decided by 1 goal this year. They want more goals, Eiserman does that.

They are also wanting to build a winner - they care about that crazy desire to improve, the implication all over the ice, getting into the middle of the ice, playing all 200 ft of the ice.

Eiserman seems the unlikeliest of the group to me, now there may be a point where the risks are outweighed by the talent, but it isn't in our current projected position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad