Jabba11
Hockey Lobby
Lots of options in that top 10. Sam Dickinson is a LD however
Don't see the issue with that. Dickinson could very well be better than all of our defensemen. Not to mention that as good as Hutson and Mailloux look, it's very hard to determine their potential without seeing how they can handle the NHL with top 4 minutes. Even if they both show they can handle it well and Dickinson is on par with Guhle, we can trade him for a forward that would likely be better than the ones available at 10.Lots of options in that top 10. Sam Dickinson is a LD however
6 points tonight. He’s one heck of a player. Easily the best player on a really bad Spitfires team. 31 more points than the 2nd leading scorer on his team. He has nice upside, but the skating needs a bit of work.I understand the concerns about his skating but I don’t think we can ignore Liam Greentree. This guy has Corey Perry written all over him (maybe less of a mean streak)
6 points tonight. He’s one heck of a player. Easily the best player on a really bad Spitfires team. 31 more points than the 2nd leading scorer on his team. He has nice upside, but the skating needs a bit of work.
I'd rather have one of the Ds than Catton. Do not want a soft, small forward with a top 10 pick.
Heck gimme Dickinson. I know he's a LD, still, he'll be a force.
Only small forward I'd want is Demidov, but they won't draft a Russian.
Edit: Dickinson is a right shot it seems. I want.
Dickinson there around 6th, Habs have to draft him. Make a trade of Wifi or Matheson for forward. He's clearly BPA.I'm just gonna say it.. the Habs can't really afford another bad skater in the top of their line up.
Catton isn't soft, he's built for clutch moments and has shown it in spades.
Dickinson is LD and is a Guhle clone. They're not drafting him, he would be gone before they pick anyways. He's gone top 5 and they're not taking a LD at 2.
They can draft a Russian and just draft 2. Michkov wasn't drafted for many other reasons
Xhekaj or Matheson aren't anywhere near good enough to be traded for a legitimate top 6 forward, although I agree with the general sentimentDickinson there around 6th, Habs have to draft him. Make a trade of Wifi or Matheson for forward. He's clearly BPA.
Matheson should fetch a first. He's logs a lot of minutes. Guhle can play right side though. Maybe keep Matheson.Xhekaj or Matheson aren't anywhere near good enough to be traded for a legitimate top 6 forward, although I agree with the general sentiment
Catton is nowhere near softI'd rather have one of the Ds than Catton. Do not want a soft, small forward with a top 10 pick.
Heck gimme Dickinson. I know he's a LD, still, he'll be a force.
Only small forward I'd want is Demidov, but they won't draft a Russian.
Edit: Dickinson is a right shot it seems. I want.
I think there is absolutely no chance they trade Matheson this trade deadline. Ex Hughes client, Montreal guy that speaks French and is part of the leadership. Management has shown they value these things particularly the personal relationship part they have build with the playersMatheson should fetch a first. He's logs a lot of minutes. Guhle can play right side though. Maybe keep Matheson.
Can't pass on Dickinson around 6-7th. Especially way league is going towards big physical mobile defense men
That be back in Timmins/Bergevin era when they drafted on need. Needing a center Took the lesser center and passing on Hughes or Dobson types.
BPA all the way!I don't disagree but there are some seriously talented Dmen that could overwhelm the top 10 picks. Do you pick the best player (who could easily be a future#1 ) or do you draft for need?
If Sam Dickinson is the only superstar potential player by Habs brass evaluation when our pick comes, what happens?Yeah there's no doubt that offensively,
It couldn't be going any better lol
HuGo must really sit back at times and go holy shit, we're almost legit overboard on D right now..
I don't know how you don't draft 11 forwards in June lol
I really think he'll be the first or second d man off the board. Unless we're top 5 I don't think he'll at our pick. That's good news for us. That said, if he falls to our pick, I would be upset if he passed, he has a #1 skill set.Lots of options in that top 10. Sam Dickinson is a LD however
If Sam Dickinson is the only superstar potential player by Habs brass evaluation when our pick comes, what happens?
I am okay with how heavily we invested in our D. I think it will make the team good to very good for a long time. I just hope we haven't painted ourselves In a corner.
Yeah there's no doubt that offensively,
It couldn't be going any better lol
HuGo must really sit back at times and go holy shit, we're almost legit overboard on D right now..
I don't know how you don't draft 11 forwards in June lol
It's a good point. If Hedman and Duchene are on the board, you don't pass on Hedman for Duchene because you have too many young D in the system and not enough forwards.You draft him and you trade one of the other Ds. IMO, you don't skip on Hedman for Duchene because you need a forward. That said, I don't follow the draft much anymore, so I wouldn't know how big the gap is between the players in the top 10.
I feel matheson can get us something. Since with the Habs, 68 points in 98 games and can skate like he can? Not to mention a really good contract. He has value and would excel with a Defensive partnerXhekaj or Matheson aren't anywhere near good enough to be traded for a legitimate top 6 forward, although I agree with the general sentiment
Grant is always right about who the Habs will pick but it is an extra sensitive topic on these boards.
They might of. No reallyIt's a good point. If Hedman and Duchene are on the board, you don't pass on Hedman for Duchene because you have too many young D in the system and not enough forwards.
Yeah, I'm a big proponent of going after the BPA. Tampa may have drafted for need when selecting and gotten lucky that was their need.They might of. No really
At the draft, considering circumstances and weighing the 2, you have no idea that the Hedman that DID go 2nd ov would actually of become the monster we've ended up seeing, you can't base it all on hindsight that well yeah obviously they made the right pick after seeing how both careers have turned out
But consider, if they didn't already have Lecavalier and St Louis AND just drafted Stamkos 1st overall the very year before
They could of VERY well taken Duchene over Hedman
See what I'm getting at lol
The only was I’m drafting a D is if Celebrini, Eiserman, Demidov and Lindstrom go 1-2-3-4 in this years draft.I don't disagree but there are some seriously talented Dmen that could overwhelm the top 10 picks. Do you pick the best player (who could easily be a future#1 ) or do you draft for need?