What actually happened to Cowen after Ottawa? He doesn't play anywhere it seems (quick look at HockeyDB). Maybe I'm crazy but I think he would have been a decent D had it not been for the injury. I thought he looked pretty good in his rookie year.
I think he was told by the Leafs that they weren’t going to actually use him and then in the offseason he tried to land a job somewhere in the nhl but retired after it was clear it wouldn’t happenWhat actually happened to Cowen after Ottawa? He doesn't play anywhere it seems (quick look at HockeyDB). Maybe I'm crazy but I think he would have been a decent D had it not been for the injury. I thought he looked pretty good in his rookie year.
He lost a step after hurting his hip in Belleville and imo was never the same. I don't think he'd have ever panned out as the stud top 4 Dman we hoped for as his decision making was always going to be a step behind, but with his tools he easily should have been able to carve out a bottom 4 role.What actually happened to Cowen after Ottawa? He doesn't play anywhere it seems (quick look at HockeyDB). Maybe I'm crazy but I think he would have been a decent D had it not been for the injury. I thought he looked pretty good in his rookie year.
Kleber sounds interesting. This article says he has drawn similarities to Moritz Seider. What similarities and differences do you see between the two?Would use our plethora of 4ths to hammer out some guys in the USHl.
Kleber is the guy who is likely gone, but assuming he’s there grab him. Very likely to carve out a role at the pro level.
Burnevik has impressed me with his progression this season, huge frame, can skate. Would be happy to bet on him with a 4th. Use our overaged pick similar to the way we did with Batherson.
Veilleux is a guy I’ve liked for a long time, he has been a stand out, stand out defender in midget the past 2 years, with lots of pro potential. Would have been much higher than a late first in the Q if he never told all the teams he wasn’t reporting. Smartest guy on the ice, always making the right decisions. He’s not going to wow anyone with flashy plays, but is extremely cerebral and dependable. Feel like whoever gets him will be getting a steal down the road.
No hockey sense injury or not. He lacked basic intelligence in general.What actually happened to Cowen after Ottawa? He doesn't play anywhere it seems (quick look at HockeyDB). Maybe I'm crazy but I think he would have been a decent D had it not been for the injury. I thought he looked pretty good in his rookie year.
Obviously we'd all love to be winning our way to a playoff run, but these losses are extremely beneficial for the Sens.
There is absolutely 4 high, high level prospect, and then another 3/4+ top 10 guys well worth the draft slot.
All 3 Russians should be in our top 4, no clue how KHL factor and guys playing in Russia will play out, but passing on any of those 2 will be disheartening. They are all very, very strong prospects.
Any of Buium, Dickenson, Yakemchuk, Parekh would be great guys to add after the top group of guys on D (in order of my personal preference, that one will be different among pretty much everyone) and Lindstom, Catton, Helenius and Iginla are all guys I'd be happy walking away with.
Pretty much have my own personal preference list a 3 tier grouping, Celebrini, Russians, and then the larger group of D and F
Outside of winning 1st place lottery, I'd be extremely happy if we get both Levshunov (Sandy-Lev future top pairing OMG) and Brandsegg-Nygård (On one hand, Norwegian bias, BUT he's also moulding up to be a modern power forward which would be awesome for us).Obviously we'd all love to be winning our way to a playoff run, but these losses are extremely beneficial for the Sens.
There is absolutely 4 high, high level prospect, and then another 3/4+ top 10 guys well worth the draft slot.
All 3 Russians should be in our top 4, no clue how KHL factor and guys playing in Russia will play out, but passing on any of those 2 will be disheartening. They are all very, very strong prospects.
Any of Buium, Dickenson, Yakemchuk, Parekh would be great guys to add after the top group of guys on D (in order of my personal preference, that one will be different among pretty much everyone) and Lindstom, Catton, Helenius and Iginla are all guys I'd be happy walking away with.
Pretty much have my own personal preference list a 3 tier grouping, Celebrini, Russians, and then the larger group of D and F
If Demidov and Lev are both available by our pick, I'd go for BPA in Demidov. But if Lev is available over the other Russians, pick Lev. He has all the possibilities of becoming a future 1 RHD. Sandy-Lev would be a dream top pairing.Do you count Levshunov in with the Russians? Just FYI he is Belarusian I believe. How would you rank them? I think the fact that Levy isn’t stuck in Russia gives him the slight edge but I also love Demidov.
So where does that 2nd tier of players after Celibirini drop off?
I'm on the tank train but haven't researched this year's crop much yet. Is dropping/rising a few spaces a big deal, based on where we're currently seated?
No hockey sense injury or not. He lacked basic intelligence in general.
I agree with your group.. I expect the D to remain high in Bob Macs final ranking in this draft. I think Silayev and Demidov stay in the top 5. 2 more in the top 5 likely includes Levshunov RD based on current rankings and a toss up between Lindstrom and Dickinson. Catton and Iginla have both risen.. as has Buium. Going to be interesting. Don't sleep on Dickinson pushing up a little further. I would put him and Silayev ahead of the D field personally although Levshunov has more fan fare as of now.I suspect the consensus would probably be a drop off after Silayev, Lindstrom, Demidov, Dickinson, Catton and Levshunov, but there is likely to be another tier within those players.
Some would have Eiserman in that group as well, but he looks like a faller. I suspect Iginla will continue to rise and join that group as a consensus top 8 guy.
Obviously we'd all love to be winning our way to a playoff run, but these losses are extremely beneficial for the Sens.
There is absolutely 4 high, high level prospect, and then another 3/4+ top 10 guys well worth the draft slot.
All 3 Russians should be in our top 4, no clue how KHL factor and guys playing in Russia will play out, but passing on any of those 2 will be disheartening. They are all very, very strong prospects.
Any of Buium, Dickenson, Yakemchuk, Parekh would be great guys to add after the top group of guys on D (in order of my personal preference, that one will be different among pretty much everyone) and Lindstom, Catton, Helenius and Iginla are all guys I'd be happy walking away with.
Pretty much have my own personal preference list a 3 tier grouping, Celebrini, Russians, and then the larger group of D and F
I keep flip-flopping between wanting an RD and wanting a centre. The fact that Norris has such huge injury issues, plus the fact he may not be more than a 50-60 point guy is making me lean towards the latter.
Maybe you pick for need in the late 1st, but not that high up in the draft.I keep flip-flopping between wanting an RD and wanting a centre. The fact that Norris has such huge injury issues, plus the fact he may not be more than a 50-60 point guy is making me lean towards the latter.
If he never had his injuries and/or if he had more humility he could have been a Gudas type, I'm sure. His IQ was a major weakness but his physical package was so impressive.What actually happened to Cowen after Ottawa? He doesn't play anywhere it seems (quick look at HockeyDB). Maybe I'm crazy but I think he would have been a decent D had it not been for the injury. I thought he looked pretty good in his rookie year.
Make your list of who you want ahead of who based on your evaluations and any other factors you want to include and draft accordingly.I keep flip-flopping between wanting an RD and wanting a centre. The fact that Norris has such huge injury issues, plus the fact he may not be more than a 50-60 point guy is making me lean towards the latter.
I believe Craig Button on TSN says it drops off at 23.I guess the big question is, how deep is the draft? Where is the consensus drop off points?