I'm not suggesting Gonchar to be inducted for his defense, which improved greatly as his career went on. There is no denying that Gonchar was one of the premier offensive defenseman in the league for 2 decades and for 10 years was the highest goal scoring defenseman and had the highest points per game. If a forward such as Guy Carbonneau (career high 26 goals/5 seasons of 50 points) can get in for his defense then why can't a defenseman such as Gonchar (career high 26 goals/10 seasons of 50 points) get in for his offense? It just doesn't make sense.
It did improve as his career went on.
I agree that Gonchar was a very good offensive defenseman for a long time.
I won't check those stats, but I have no reason to assume you'd lie about them.
I don't even think the Carbonneau analogy is bad.
This is a better argument right here than lashing out and calling everyone that doesn't agree with you biased (like the hundreds of writers that cast a vote for Shea Weber - who they would certainly not be beholden to at any point, but definitely not in the years you mentioned - over Christian Ehrhoff).
Point shares is a joke. It's not a good formula, it's just *a* formula. It's a biased formula too. Just because it's math, doesn't make it automatically objective.
You're a big count-up-the-points guy, that's fine. Sell it on that because we're obviously not gonna get to a point where you're going to breakdown any Gonchar video for us from his Capitals days (though, that would be the best). Coming in here and trying to sell some concocted "reputation bias" for young Nashville Predators 2nd round pick Shea Weber over famously-did-not-bet-on-himself Christian Ehrhoff makes you a justified magnet for rotten vegetable hurling haha