Malaka
you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
What kind of offensive upside are you seeing? Top 6 production?
I think there's 3rd line scoring potential, but nothing more.
For me it's gimped by the fact that he has no motor or consistency, and I've never once seen him successfully pull off the dangles or 1 v 3 situations he puts himself in.
He definitely has a motor. The stupid not working at higher levels is an argument I can definitely get behind. I don't see a ton of upside but a 20/20 guy with an edge I can very easily see.
Guy who comes to mind actually is Hartman — this is all reminiscent of an argument I used to have with a superfan over him vs schmaltz when they were coming up... as a prospect was he ever quoted for his hockey IQ or is he dumb where maybe Boisvert a “meatstick” in a similar vein?That's fair.
But you won't see me getting excited over drafting Richard Panik at 18th overall, when there were better selections to make.
Hartman never seemed dynamic, but had upside as a goal scorer, plays with an edge and has a good motor — Different qualities probably concerning how he makes an impact like being a pest and won’t wow you like schmaltz’s playmaking but you could never say he’s soft and he’ll get to the gritty areas.
Not the kind of thing you want to hear for your 18OA pick but Booster(autocorrect has just bestowed him a possible nickname, praise be technology and take notes fiddy) I could see being something of a staple/fan favorite
Last edited: