Snubbed4Vezina
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2022
- 2,382
- 4,181
Saad is missing from those lines. I wonder what's going on there.
I thought the same thing. I kind of like them without him tbh.
Looks like Saad is playing with the kids. I wonder if there is something going on there. Everyone in this group looks like people who will be sent down
I'm hoping it's just a Vet for Dvo to play with. But, I wouldn't rule out Trade talks. I just think it's weird. I was expecting both groups to be a little more 50/50 on talent.Give Dvorsky a vet to learn from? Idk. I highly doubt we'd bench/send down Saad. Only other thing icould be uf we are in trade talks to move him for some reason.
Walker is a placeholder for Sunny, sounds like they are expecting him back in the lineup within the first 10 games, that'd be our 4cReally? You'd rather play Walker for 82 games at C than shift Texier to C and play Saad?
Walker is a placeholder for Sunny, sounds like they are expecting him back in the lineup within the first 10 games, that'd be our 4c
I wonder if we could be in talks to move Saad+Perunovich+? for a middle six center.
That's what I am thinking, or a younger bottom 6 with a little bit of upside. Or even just move him for draft capital if he is not in our long term plans
Agreed and I would add Tucker into that group as well.I would like to see a trade of some sort just to create some breathing room. We have too many bodies, even at the AHL level it seems.
Although I’m not sure if I’m ready to move Saad right now. Unless we can find a decent Center for him, I’d rather just find a team that needs some depth and give them Perunovich and Kapanen for a 7th.
I would like to see a trade of some sort just to create some breathing room. We have too many bodies, even at the AHL level it seems.
Although I’m not sure if I’m ready to move Saad right now. Unless we can find a decent Center for him, I’d rather just find a team that needs some depth and give them Perunovich and Kapanen for a 7th.
Really? You'd rather play Walker for 82 games at C than shift Texier to C and play Saad?
Gonna need you to settle down, Eklund (E4).Sorry yall for making a mountain out of a mole hill
I wonder if Bolduc's play so far is forcing Army's hand into moving Sadd sooner rather th withan later (if they are going through trade talks)
Ok, looks like there's nothing to look into.
For me, it's about speedy partners for Saad. He really hasn't slowed down at all. Whether it's the 2nd or the 3rd line, what I care about is Saad having speedy partners. Luckily, our team has tons of speed right now.I prefer that top 6 without Saad
What about Texier? He is a center and I see nothing about him in the training camp news.Yeah I was thinking a vet C with up to 2-3 years left on his deal so they don’t block Dvorsky. Could also see a younger guy with some upside, especially if it’s a team who could use a vet like Saad.
Draft capital I wouldn’t mind, but I can’t see them just giving up his 20+ goals when they want to make the playoffs.
His career faceoff win rate is 35.5%, he's not really a center.What about Texier? He is a center and I see nothing about him in the training camp news.