Romang67
BitterSwede
Fleury is rocking a 43% xGF% and is 28 years old. Not sure why Heinola's having a higher potential than that would be unthinkable. We're not talking beating out Morrissey for the #1D spot here.
Based on today’s line rushes in practice today it appears that Stan will be in for Heinola tomorrow.I'm not saying Fleury is bad. I'm saying he is better than Stan except for physical aggressiveness. He is not a top 4 Dman. That doesn't make him 'bad'. My impression of him on the 3rd pair was that he was good in that position. Maybe I should say that he is less bad than Stan.
Heinola is unknown. His potential is higher than either of the other 2. But the likelihood of him passing them is unknown.
Confidence is a large part of playing hockey at the highest levels. He needs to get comfortable and start playing with more confidence before we will know what he can do. He seems to be getting better each game. Lets stick with it.
Everyone talks about his offence, his first pass, his zone exits, etc. IIRC he was actually pretty good defensively in the AHL, using good skating and smarts to be effective against bigger men. I think he needs to be more than just an offensive Dman to succeed in the NHL. So far, I haven't seen enough of either offence or defence from him. But I have seen flashes. He hasn't failed yet. Give him a little rope.
more of forward problem id say.Fleury is rocking a 43% xGF% and is 28 years old. Not sure why Heinola's having a higher potential than that would be unthinkable. We're not talking beating out Morrissey for the #1D spot here.
Based on today’s line rushes in practice today it appears that Stan will be in for Heinola tomorrow.
Same as last season with Tampa Bay, and he's been over 2.11 xGF/60 once in the last 5 seasons. Bump him up to that, his second highest xGF/60 in his last five seasons, and he sits at 45% xGF%.more of forward problem id say.
the xGF side is suffering which for a dman like fleury is not the primary stat id be looking at for him.
Same as last season with Tampa Bay, and he's been over 2.11 xGF/60 once in the last 5 seasons. Bump him up to that, his second highest xGF/60 in his last five seasons, and he sits at 45% xGF%.
This is probably who he is at this point in his career.
Fleury is rocking a 43% xGF% and is 28 years old. Not sure why Heinola's having a higher potential than that would be unthinkable. We're not talking beating out Morrissey for the #1D spot here.
Fleury is who he is. If he gets his xGA/60 down to around 2, he's going to hover around 50% xGF%. He's not close to that, and he hasn't been in a few years.yes, he is not the offensive catalyst from the back-end. xGF for the average dman will be dependent on who the fwd mix is. per moneypuck morrissey is 2.6 xGF/60, is morrissey worth merely 0.5 xGF/60 more than fleury? idk strikes me as the Jets fwds aren't creating.
fleury plays well defensively, which is more than you can say about heinola. heinola also hasn't done anything of note offensively. so nothing defensively or offensively, i can see why they may not want him in the line-up.
also seems like fleury is hurt, and heinola is still not playing.
Fleury is who he is. If he gets his xGA/60 down to around 2, he's going to hover around 50% xGF%. He's not close to that, and he hasn't been in a few years.
I'd rather see if Heinola is closer to what he was against Minnesota and Toronto, and if not accept that they need a new D-man, than hope that Fleury is all of a sudden going to be someone he hasn't been in years.
Is it likely that Heinola is much better than he has shown? Not really. But I'd say it's more likely than that Fleury is. If he isn't, the loss is minimal.
Where are you getting those numbers? Because they seem to match what I'm seeing for every other D-man fairly well, except for Heinola who according to NaturalStatrick should be at roughly Stanley's level vertically, and slightly to the right of Pionk horizontally.yes fleury is who he is, fine defensively but isn't going to do much to change things offensively. IMO xGF for most defenders is a fwd dependent stat.
actually, vaunted offensive dynamo ville heinola is slightly worse in xGF/60 than fleury, and on an island by himself of poor defensively.
i do think heinola should be in over stanley, but lets not act like heinola has been anything of note.
this is season-to date and can obvs change
View attachment 951916
this is moneypucks tool you can make a custom plot easilyWhere are you getting those numbers? Because they seem to match what I'm seeing for every other D-man fairly well, except for Heinola who according to NaturalStatrick should be at roughly Stanley's level vertically, and slightly to the right of Pionk horizontally.
They do. Heinola's are quite a bit worse, while Fleury's are quite a bit better (43->40 & 43->45).this is moneypucks tool you can make a custom plot easily
NHL Team Advanced Stats
Analyze all NHL teams with advanced stats & data visualizationwww.moneypuck.com
they might have differing values for xGF
Thanks for pointing out thqt coghlan is our best D haha - or dont use stats without critical massyes fleury is who he is, fine defensively but isn't going to do much to change things offensively. IMO xGF for most defenders is a fwd dependent stat.
actually, vaunted offensive dynamo ville heinola is slightly worse in xGF/60 than fleury, and on an island by himself of poor defensively.
i do think heinola should be in over stanley, but lets not act like heinola has been anything of note.
this is season-to date and can obvs change
View attachment 951916
they don't have a filter function, otherwise would've removed his 1 gp. it's 1gp worth of stats where i actually thought he played well vs Vegas.Fun fact
Stan has the least amount of hits of all of our regular D - but yes we need his 'toughness'
Most hits? DeMelo
Thanks for pointing out thqt coghlan is our best D haha - or dont use stats without critical mass
Fun fact
Stan has the least amount of hits of all of our regular D - but yes we need his 'toughness'
Most hits? DeMelo
Thanks for pointing out thqt coghlan is our best D haha - or dont use stats without critical mass
Unreal, honestly the Jets management and coaching really love playing the square peg round hole game with Stanley. Unless someone is hurt that we don't know about why is Stanley playing? I may be completely wrong but Stanley doesn't help this team as far as I'm concerned. Some call it Stanley hate but i don't hate Stanley i just think he doesn't help the Jets win hockey games ,pure and simple.Based on today’s line rushes in practice today it appears that Stan will be in for Heinola tomorrow.
Lebrun in an article mentioned Ristolainen as a trade target for the Jets. Actually playing decent in Philly after being ass in Buffalo. And actually physical.
Also
Stan doesn't hit that often - he's more of a defender in how he pushes guys off the puck - he has the size to do that. He also moves guys out of the crease and middle ice. Is he a champ at this? No - but he's better at it than most of them (who spend more time getting tangled up net front and being even more of a screen).Fun fact
Stan has the least amount of hits of all of our regular D - but yes we need his 'toughness'
Most hits? DeMelo
Thanks for pointing out thqt coghlan is our best D haha - or dont use stats without critical mass
Shouldn't be that hard to grasp - they want his size in the line up and the team needs his size out there.Unreal, honestly the Jets management and coaching really love playing the square peg round hole game with Stanley. Unless someone is hurt that we don't know about why is Stanley playing? I may be completely wrong but Stanley doesn't help this team as far as I'm concerned. Some call it Stanley hate but i don't hate Stanley i just think he doesn't help the Jets win hockey games ,pure and simple.
Heinola will be a regular, probably with another organization if this keeps upStanley is 4th in Hits/60 after Miller, DeMelo and Fleury, respectively. Coughlin is just behind Stanley, but that's a one game sample. Then it's Pionk, Samberg, Heinola and Morrissey.
There's really only one spot in the Jets lineup for Heinola and that's 3rd pair offensive D...and that's not even a regular spot - the Jets would prefer two defensive defensemen on the 3rd pair most nights (with one of them being a penalty killer).
I don't think Heinola will ever get a run of games to grow into a regular NHLer (unless Pionk or Morrissey gets injured for 10+ games...and even then, are they going to throw Heinola into the lineup and hope for the best, or just double down on more stay-at-home defensemen).
They really might as well just waive him since any value he once had has evaporated and he's got no chance of getting a fair shake here.