StlBigFly
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2012
- 455
- 265
Canada made a deal out of having cup winners it seems. It’s a talking point at least.
So it seems to me that when they built the team they picked two cup winning goalies, that they’d both get a minimum of 1 game, then perhaps merit or matchup based going forward. Maybe not, but it kinda makes sense.
From a matchup perspective: you’d expect the USA to have way more netfront presence than any other team and Adin Hill is gigantic.
I could see them start hill but after reading a bunch of opinions I’m thinking they should stick with Binnington.
If I had to guess: they use binnington versus anybody but the US, and hill in those games, taking advantage of Binner’s athleticism and Hill’s being enormous.
So it seems to me that when they built the team they picked two cup winning goalies, that they’d both get a minimum of 1 game, then perhaps merit or matchup based going forward. Maybe not, but it kinda makes sense.
From a matchup perspective: you’d expect the USA to have way more netfront presence than any other team and Adin Hill is gigantic.
I could see them start hill but after reading a bunch of opinions I’m thinking they should stick with Binnington.
If I had to guess: they use binnington versus anybody but the US, and hill in those games, taking advantage of Binner’s athleticism and Hill’s being enormous.
Last edited: