Personal hopes at this point:
1) We're able to re-sign Ehlers to something that works
2) Lambert and Chibrikov improve on good seasons last year and become playoff black aces (sorry Moose).
2b) Lambert himself plays well enough to be thought of as a C replacement if needed.
3) For TD additions, we don't trade away any 1sts or top prospects (Lambert, Salo, Yager, Chibs, and maybe Barlow). We go the depth route and add players like Nino, Names, for lesser costs.
4) If we HAVE to add a C for a high cost (Names and Lambert not options), I hope we start looking for players with some term.
I'd really like to see Lambert on the same line as Ehlers and Namestnikov at some point before any decisions are made. That could be a pure speed line to balance out some heavier lines I'm not sure Ehlers-Perfetti is sustainable. I'd be ok with him adding scoring to the 4th line. Having Lambert and Perfetti on the 2bd PP would add more skill overall.Personal hopes at this point:
1) We're able to re-sign Ehlers to something that works
2) Lambert and Chibrikov improve on good seasons last year and become playoff black aces (sorry Moose).
2b) Lambert himself plays well enough to be thought of as a C replacement if needed.
3) For TD additions, we don't trade away any 1sts or top prospects (Lambert, Salo, Yager, Chibs, and maybe Barlow). We go the depth route and add players like Nino, Names, for lesser costs.
4) If we HAVE to add a C for a high cost (Names and Lambert not options), I hope we start looking for players with some term.
if you're anticipating ehlers being re-signed, KC i am going to guess get extended next summer. then you have Vilardi and Perfetti as 2 RFA Wingers who i don't think are going anywhere either. There's no room for top-6 Wingers. id dangle a fwd prospect+ for piece(s) now w/ term ofc.Personal hopes at this point:
1) We're able to re-sign Ehlers to something that works
2) Lambert and Chibrikov improve on good seasons last year and become playoff black aces (sorry Moose).
2b) Lambert himself plays well enough to be thought of as a C replacement if needed.
3) For TD additions, we don't trade away any 1sts or top prospects (Lambert, Salo, Yager, Chibs, and maybe Barlow). We go the depth route and add players like Nino, Names, for lesser costs.
4) If we HAVE to add a C for a high cost (Names and Lambert not options), I hope we start looking for players with some term.
We could run out of space for sure. I'm also not 100% against moving a forward prospect (although I would hate to move Lambert, Yager, or Chibs at this point) for another piece, but IMO that return would need to be young with term as well like you mention. And that's only if you don't think Lambert can get there to be a 2C.if you're anticipating ehlers being re-signed, KC i am going to guess get extended next summer. then you have Vilardi and Perfetti as 2 RFA Wingers who i don't think are going anywhere either. There's no room for top-6 Wingers. id dangle a fwd prospect+ for piece(s) now w/ term ofc.
Pionk is a bit of a mystery. He can be very good at times as well as being inconsistent with his play? Does he just need the right partner? Maybe Samberg is that guy? Saying he just plays well in contract years seems like a bit of lazy argument IMO, as he has had some nice stretches in other years as well. I agree the Jets will re-sign him despite the complaints from some. I do think they will want to go longer term with Samberg due to age.You would think Pionk's numbers go up if he keeps playing the way he is. His career year will trump De Melo's by a lot. De Melo is also more likely to age out from wear and tear in his contract. But I see Samberg and Pionk signing the same term length. There's chemistry between them on and off the ice. You can't necessarily separate their success from each other. They had some success last year too, without much fanfare.
Thinking a bit about Ehlers' situation...
First, I think he's highly valuable and without his offensive impact the Jets could struggle enough offensively to be at risk of falling out of playoff contention. He's juiced the PP and is starting to get that secondary scoring line cooking. I hope the Jets can find a way to re-sign him.
That said, his contract ceiling is clearly below Scheifele and Hellebuyck, so the Jets aren't likely going to go beyond about $7.5-8M on a 6-7 year deal. If Ehlers is looking for considerably more than something in the $48-52M range over 6-7 years, then the Jets probably need to look to trade him for a player that can provide impact for this season and a couple more. That's the likely prime window for this core, before a next wave emerges. It's really hard to make a good hockey trade in season. I wonder if there are any teams looking to make a splash, like the Sabres. They have some good young prospects, but that might not fit what the Jets need to replace Ehlers. Maybe something around Ryan McLeod +? I doubt the Sabres would want to move him, but he might be a good option to replace Namestnikov.
If Ehlers produced like Schief and Helle he'd get the same dealThe Jets have to show Ehlers they want him and dispel any feelings of disrespect he may or may not have felt in his time with the Jets. One way to do that is to offer him a matching deal to Scheifele and Helle. The Jets are unlikely to break even in an Ehlers trade in the short-term so imo they should be doing a full court press to get him re-signed. And offering a matching deal to 55/37 should be on the table imo.
If you were teaching a psychology course this would be a perfect example of projection. Ehlers has never once said he has felt disrespected by the Jets.The Jets have to show Ehlers they want him and dispel any feelings of disrespect he may or may not have felt in his time with the Jets. One way to do that is to offer him a matching deal to Scheifele and Helle. The Jets are unlikely to break even in an Ehlers trade in the short-term so imo they should be doing a full court press to get him re-signed. And offering a matching deal to 55/37 should be on the table imo.