Lt Dan
F*** your ice cream!
We gotta give Adolf Hiller big props for this win. Earlier this year or under the Koala, the kings would have been shelled after that horribad start
Because DAL wouldn’t let them get in the zone!Not a chance. It'd be one thing if LA had purpose, and DAL was deflecting them, LA had zero purpose last night, zero drive, when they DID drive the net, they scored, Jeannot, Foegle were the only two doing f***all towards the net.....
'Yea...no.Because DAL wouldn’t let them get in the zone!
NIce to see a win, but that was some mediocre hockey.
indeed, but found a way to win, they didn't fold. Hopefully they learn that they can't take a period off and expect to win against and opponent like Dallas and especially the way Minny has been playing.NIce to see a win, but that was some mediocre hockey.
I suspect Hiller wanted more "toughness" in the lineup verse Dallas.Uninspiring, do the least you can and pray it's good enough, not a big fan of the 11/7 not sure why, unless they couldn't keep Lee up as an emergency call up..... @All The Kings Men any insight on that?
Tmac never made adjustments. Theyd have gotten shelled in the first period and stayed back on their heels the rest of the game while running Kopitar into the ground for nearly half of it.We gotta give Adolf Hiller big props for this win. Earlier this year or under the Koala, the kings would have been shelled after that horribad start
Mediocre roster = mediocre hockey.NIce to see a win, but that was some mediocre hockey.
Personally, I feel like the 11/7 is annoying because it disrupts flow/consistency. It forces the Kings to constantly change their line combos / D pairings.Uninspiring, do the least you can and pray it's good enough, not a big fan of the 11/7 not sure why, unless they couldn't keep Lee up as an emergency call up..... @All The Kings Men any insight on that?
This is a team that we would be stoked about in 2004 when just making the playoffs was a win for the fanbase. Actually winning something lets us know when we are watching a team that is good enough to win it all and this ain't it.Mediocre roster = mediocre hockey.
It's actually pretty remarkable where the team is at right now. So many players underperforming. Terrible PP. No #1 Dman. A backup goalie as our starter. And yet we have 15 regulation wins. NJ is the only team with more. 4pts out of 1st in the division with a game in hand.
I think it says more about the division than it says about the Kings. Kings aren’t a good team. The needle hasn’t moved forward this year. Anyone who is content with this brand of hockey is not watching with context.Mediocre roster = mediocre hockey.
It's actually pretty remarkable where the team is at right now. So many players underperforming. Terrible PP. No #1 Dman. A backup goalie as our starter. And yet we have 15 regulation wins. NJ is the only team with more. 4pts out of 1st in the division with a game in hand.
Part of me laments those days.This is a team that we would be stoked about in 2004 when just making the playoffs was a win for the fanbase.
I agree. 11/7 can cause massive flow issues for players who are typically creatures of habit and thrive on chemistry.Personally, I feel like the 11/7 is annoying because it disrupts flow/consistency. It forces the Kings to constantly change their line combos / D pairings.
It's also just kind of..... Pointless (IMO). Like I know Burroughs had an assist last night but even then he ended up with 4 mins and 50 seconds of ice time. What good does that really do??
I'd much rather roll 4 forward lines and allow players to establish chemistry with consistent linemates / d partners as opposed to shuffling things around all night just to get a 7th d man (who hadn't played in nearly a month) less than 5 mins of ice time.
It can be effective - and it can be fun at times because it'll yield some interesting line combos/pairings. But more often than not, it just feels disruptive.
Kings have played one of the softest schedules in the league, so that's contributing to their "success" for sure.I think it says more about the division than it says about the Kings. Kings aren’t a good team. The needle hasn’t moved forward this year. Anyone who is content with this brand of hockey is not watching with context.
Is that listed somewhere, LA’s soft schedule compared to other teams….tsn, espn ?Kings have played one of the softest schedules in the league, so that's contributing to their "success" for sure.
Is that listed somewhere, LA’s soft schedule compared to other teams….tsn, espn ?
I think it says more about the division than it says about the Kings. Kings aren’t a good team. The needle hasn’t moved forward this year. Anyone who is content with this brand of hockey is not watching with context.
Joel Edmundson is way better than 99% of us thought.
Whos content with it?I think it says more about the division than it says about the Kings. Kings aren’t a good team. The needle hasn’t moved forward this year. Anyone who is content with this brand of hockey is not watching with context.
He often seems more interested in generating offense than being a responsible defender. It gets on my nerves considering the role he was brought in for.I don't think he is, really. He's just smart enough to play within his means for the most part. He got burned catastrophically quite a few times last night, as well, and was bailed out. Rittich doesn't make a couple of saves and we're having a very different conversation about Flatfoot McGee this AM.
Still does have the absolute hammer of a shot though, one that makes people respect it, and that is definitely an underrated weapon.
I think you have blocked them lolNo one said any of this.
I don't think he is, really. He's just smart enough to play within his means for the most part. He got burned catastrophically quite a few times last night, as well, and was bailed out. Rittich doesn't make a couple of saves and we're having a very different conversation about Flatfoot McGee this AM.
Still does have the absolute hammer of a shot though, one that makes people respect it, and that is definitely an underrated weapon.