Toggle sidebar

Speculation: 2024-25 Roster thread

It's possible (or maybe even slightly likely) that some of these guys aren't qualified, but still come back on a lesser deal, like Leason and Vaaks this season. If they are marginal players on a bottom 10 team, I highly doubt they're going to find permanent jobs elsewhere. At least here, they know they at least have a fighting chance at getting NHL playing time.
 
All Mighty said:
Legitimately the only reason that’s the case is because they don’t have anyone else to take PK draws (and he’s not very good at them anyway). If they had a better faceoff man who could play the PK, Lundestrom’s PK time would be cut back substantially.
Click to expand...
I don't think it's that simple... Harkins has the best FO% on the team and plays on the PK half as much as Lundestrom does.
 
Lundy gets extremely undervalued around these boards. If anything, Leason is overrated!

I get that he’s essentially a net zero offensively at putting the puck in the net - BUT he does have a sneaky skill set once he has the ability to showcase it.

Problem is, he (at least to my knowledge) hasn’t had many chances to display anything in the top six. Most of his coaches have stapled him on the bottom half of the lineup.
 
I'd keep Lundy as the 4th line LW or 13th forward. He skates better than most of our other players and PKs well with his speed. He can be the 4th line C if Gaucher isn't up for it or we don't find anyone better.
 
Smirnov2Chistov said:
Lundy gets extremely undervalued around these boards. If anything, Leason is overrated!

I get that he’s essentially a net zero offensively at putting the puck in the net - BUT he does have a sneaky skill set once he has the ability to showcase it.

Problem is, he (at least to my knowledge) hasn’t had many chances to display anything in the top six. Most of his coaches have stapled him on the bottom half of the lineup.
Click to expand...
The years to put Lundy with top 6 talent were when Silf and Grant were using those spots. Everyone knew they would be out of the league once their contracts were up but for some reason we were still using them in prominent spots.

Now? I'm not sure theres a spot there.
 
Putting Lundy in the top 6 would be like cooking a steak medium well and insisting that it's still just as good as medium or medium rare if you just pour enough sauce on top of it.

We should get actual top 6 production calibre players for the top 6 to improve, not try to cram whoever we have who, under the right laboratory circumstances, might sometimes show creativity and perhaps maybe potentially be a goal scorer into the mix.
 
JAHV said:
People are talking about Lundestrom and his PK ability as if it's a positive quality. The Ducks' PK is possibly the worst in the league. It gives up the most expected goals against per 60. Even by traditional stats it's bad.

Lundestrom is part of the problem.
Click to expand...
Lundestrom is one player. PKing is a system.

He skates better than most of the other players on the team and that's an important quality for a penalty killer to be able to close the gaps created by being short handed. As long as his contract demand is reasonable for a fourth liner / 13th forward, there's no reason not to bring him back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firequacker
Lundestrom is underrated. If we werent using him as our faceoff ace I feel like his percentage would be better. I would qualify him. I just know he would blossom elsewhere if we let him go for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12ozPapa
SmokeyDuck said:
Lundestrom is underrated. If we werent using him as our faceoff ace I feel like his percentage would be better. I would qualify him. I just know he would blossom elsewhere if we let him go for nothing.
Click to expand...
Agreed. He is the perfect 3rd liner in my view
 
SmokeyDuck said:
Lundestrom is underrated. If we werent using him as our faceoff ace I feel like his percentage would be better. I would qualify him. I just know he would blossom elsewhere if we let him go for nothing.
Click to expand...

He very well might blossom elsewhere, but he's had a lot of time here and is nowhere near blossoming.

As for the faceoff thing, why would his percentage be better if we used him more on it? A faceoff is a discrete event. If he were good at them, he would win more of the ones he actually takes.

Also, even if that were true, we would then have Lundestrom on the ice more often, which is not a good thing, seeing as he's bad at offense, and his defensive skills are questionable as well.

The only reason to keep Lundestrom around is if Verbeek is too busy dealing with bigger problems to replace him. But unless he suddenly figures everything out, he's someone who's going to need to be replaced when this team wants to be competitive.
 
SmokeyDuck said:
Lundestrom is underrated. If we werent using him as our faceoff ace I feel like his percentage would be better. I would qualify him. I just know he would blossom elsewhere if we let him go for nothing.
Click to expand...
I agree he is talented and smart, we should definitely retain in hopes he breaks out. But I do think he should be traded if we got a decent offer for him now. It could get crowded next season and it would limit his opportunities. He's not really a bottom-line grinder type.
 
Lundestrom kind of comes off as a heady player but I’m not sure he really is, especially offensively. Certainly not lacking like a Max Jones but I’m not confident at this point in him finding an offensive game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom