2024-25 Roster Thread #1: The Beginninging

Status
Not open for further replies.

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,441
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
 

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
26,600
25,230
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
Good thing the Flyers do neither of these things
 

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,273
66,282
Somewhere, FL
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
Blah
Blah, blah
Blah, blah, blah
I think everyone has had enough of your cherry picking bullshit.
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,901
161,872
South Jersey
Tortorella is regarded as like Saban & Belichick in the hockey world without nearly having their trophy cases. It would be hard to find others in the sports landscape that have gotten more shelf life out of one championship than John Tortorella. It’s been two f***ing decades now. :laugh:
The two line pass was illegal!
 

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,273
66,282
Somewhere, FL
Tortorella is regarded as like Saban & Belichick in the hockey world without nearly having their trophy cases. It would be hard to find others in the sports landscape that have gotten more shelf life out of one championship than John Tortorella. It’s been two f***ing decades now. :laugh:
The only comparable might be Buddy Ryan in Philly. 0-3 in the playoffs, couldn’t build an offense, but Philly authentics loved the guy.

Then again, Philly fans routinely booed Mike Schmidt, arguably the greatest 3rd basemen of all time, so expecting intelligence out of the hardcore authentics crowd is akin to expecting a blizzard in Key West.
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,901
161,872
South Jersey
The only comparable might be Buddy Ryan in Philly. 0-3 in the playoffs, couldn’t build an offense, but Philly authentics loved the guy.

Then again, Philly fans routinely booed Mike Schmidt, arguably the greatest 3rd basemen of all time, so expecting intelligence out of the hardcore authentics crowd is akin to expecting a blizzard in Key West.
The thing is that the greatness of Torts isn’t contained to only Philadelphia. He has a following in the culture of hockey. After all, he makes teams play “the right way.”

Hell, just listen to Emily Kaplan try to gaslight us last night with Torts’ bs about how he tells his players it’s ok for them to make mistakes in the name of offense.

Now, of course, no other NHL team wanted to touch this guy besides the Flyers so there’s a disconnect somewhere.
 

BiggE

SELL THE DAMN TEAM
Jan 4, 2019
25,273
66,282
Somewhere, FL
The thing is that the greatness of Torts isn’t contained to only Philadelphia. He has a following in the culture of hockey. After all, he makes teams play “the right way.”

Hell, just listen to Emily Kaplan try to gaslight us last night with Torts’ bs about how he tells his players it’s ok for them to make mistakes in the name of offense.

Now, of course, no other NHL team wanted to touch this guy besides the Flyers so there’s a disconnect somewhere.
Yeah, Torts plays his media sycophants like a fiddle. I think most hockey execs, especially the younger ones, know he’s a dinosaur POS, but the old guard and the media love him and his autocratic, outdated methods.

And if Briere isn’t just spouting the company line but rather is in agreement with the God Emperor, than he needs to f*** off too.
 

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
7,713
18,938
Vancouver
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
So a couple examples of a team failing at a strategy means we shouldn't do that strategy?

Bad news for people who think trying to pick high in the draft is bad, because Calgary and Minnesota have been picking in the 10-15 range for years (decades?) and they are just as mediocre as ever. Guess that means that strategy sucks!
 

ponder719

M-M-M-Matvei and the Jett
Jul 2, 2013
8,103
11,356
Philadelphia, PA
So a couple examples of a team failing at a strategy means we shouldn't do that strategy?

Good news, everyone! Every strategy that has ever been devised has been tried, and every strategy has failed, at least once, so the only thing we can do is nothing! We're going to try just not doing anything ever again and see how that works.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,441
Good news, everyone! Every strategy that has ever been devised has been tried, and every strategy has failed, at least once, so the only thing we can do is nothing! We're going to try just not doing anything ever again and see how that works.
Or the opposite, multiple strategies have succeeded, therefore, there is no 'right" strategy (there are wrong ones).

The reason most strategies fail:
1) lack of managerial talent, bad implementation
2) lack of patience, changing strategies in mid-stream
3) lack of luck, pick #2 or #3 instead of #1, injuries, etc.?
 

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
26,600
25,230
Or the opposite, multiple strategies have succeeded, therefore, there is no 'right" strategy (there are wrong ones).

The reason most strategies fail:
1) lack of managerial talent, bad implementation
2) lack of patience, changing strategies in mid-stream
3) lack of luck, pick #2 or #3 instead of #1, injuries, etc.?
Good thing the Flyers have all three of these points covered
 

prototypical4thliner

Registered User
Jan 12, 2017
4,223
6,376
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
We don’t pick well either
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,367
Armored Train
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .

Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)

Yeah, this is also why I've been calling for them to completely fire all management so they can have competent people. Picking high doesn't help if you're run by Stupids, and the Flyers could be the stupidest management group in the league.

Ideally they'd have spent the last two years picking high and very often, as well as smartly for the first time in an eternity.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,441
You thought Chuck had a coherent vision too. 3 years away from being 3 years away, same as it ever was.
He had a coherent vision in 2019 (dropped some acid in 2022).

He was going to make the moves to get them to the playoffs, which is what he was hired to do.
Need a center, check.
Need quality veteran defensemen, check.

It worked. Wasn't a long-term plan, but he wasn't hired to rebuild or retool but to win now while the window was open for Giroux, Voracek, etc. If Patrick and Lindblom were healthy, might have stayed competitive for another year or two.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,367
Armored Train
He had a coherent vision in 2019 (dropped some acid in 2022).

He was going to make the moves to get them to the playoffs, which is what he was hired to do.
Need a center, check.
Need quality veteran defensemen, check.

It worked. Wasn't a long-term plan, but he wasn't hired to rebuild or retool but to win now while the window was open for Giroux, Voracek, etc. If Patrick and Lindblom were healthy, might have stayed competitive for another year or two.

If he was hired to contend rather than rebuild than he failed very badly
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,441
They had their best season since 2011-12.
So mission accomplished.
With better luck, they might have repeated that performance for a season or two.
But it wasn't sustainable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad