Flyerfan4life
Registered User
sameasiteverwasI have already resigned myself to their finishing 6th in the division, 13th in the East, and 25th in the league. Looking forward to the good, but nowhere near great, player they take at 8th overall.
sameasiteverwasI have already resigned myself to their finishing 6th in the division, 13th in the East, and 25th in the league. Looking forward to the good, but nowhere near great, player they take at 8th overall.
Luckily the Flyers can just package some picks then and get into the top 3.I have already resigned myself to their finishing 6th in the division, 13th in the East, and 25th in the league. Looking forward to the good, but nowhere near great, player they take at 8th overall.
Good thing the Flyers do neither of these thingsAnaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .
Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
BlahAnaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .
Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
The two line pass was illegal!Tortorella is regarded as like Saban & Belichick in the hockey world without nearly having their trophy cases. It would be hard to find others in the sports landscape that have gotten more shelf life out of one championship than John Tortorella. It’s been two f***ing decades now.
The only comparable might be Buddy Ryan in Philly. 0-3 in the playoffs, couldn’t build an offense, but Philly authentics loved the guy.Tortorella is regarded as like Saban & Belichick in the hockey world without nearly having their trophy cases. It would be hard to find others in the sports landscape that have gotten more shelf life out of one championship than John Tortorella. It’s been two f***ing decades now.
The thing is that the greatness of Torts isn’t contained to only Philadelphia. He has a following in the culture of hockey. After all, he makes teams play “the right way.”The only comparable might be Buddy Ryan in Philly. 0-3 in the playoffs, couldn’t build an offense, but Philly authentics loved the guy.
Then again, Philly fans routinely booed Mike Schmidt, arguably the greatest 3rd basemen of all time, so expecting intelligence out of the hardcore authentics crowd is akin to expecting a blizzard in Key West.
Yeah, Torts plays his media sycophants like a fiddle. I think most hockey execs, especially the younger ones, know he’s a dinosaur POS, but the old guard and the media love him and his autocratic, outdated methods.The thing is that the greatness of Torts isn’t contained to only Philadelphia. He has a following in the culture of hockey. After all, he makes teams play “the right way.”
Hell, just listen to Emily Kaplan try to gaslight us last night with Torts’ bs about how he tells his players it’s ok for them to make mistakes in the name of offense.
Now, of course, no other NHL team wanted to touch this guy besides the Flyers so there’s a disconnect somewhere.
Tortorella is regarded as like Saban & Belichick in the hockey world without nearly having their trophy cases. It would be hard to find others in the sports landscape that have gotten more shelf life out of one championship than John Tortorella. It’s been two f***ing decades now.
So a couple examples of a team failing at a strategy means we shouldn't do that strategy?Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .
Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
So a couple examples of a team failing at a strategy means we shouldn't do that strategy?
Or the opposite, multiple strategies have succeeded, therefore, there is no 'right" strategy (there are wrong ones).Good news, everyone! Every strategy that has ever been devised has been tried, and every strategy has failed, at least once, so the only thing we can do is nothing! We're going to try just not doing anything ever again and see how that works.
Good thing the Flyers have all three of these points coveredOr the opposite, multiple strategies have succeeded, therefore, there is no 'right" strategy (there are wrong ones).
The reason most strategies fail:
1) lack of managerial talent, bad implementation
2) lack of patience, changing strategies in mid-stream
3) lack of luck, pick #2 or #3 instead of #1, injuries, etc.?
Who knows?Good thing the Flyers have all three of these points covered
We don’t pick well eitherAnaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .
Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
Anaheim has been picking high for six years and are still going to miss the POs.
Carolina had 4 top ten picks and traded 3 of them.
Buffalo . . .
Picking high for multiple years is not a panacea, picking well is far more important.
Lots of misses:
2015: Zacha (6), NJ failed at development, traded him for Haula, doing fine in Boston
2016: Dubois (3), talented but uncoachable, on his 4th team, Puljujarvi (4), Juolevi (5), A Nylander (8)
2017: Patrick (2), Glass (6), L Anderson (7)
2018: Hayton (5), Zadina (6), Boqvist (8), Kravtsov (9)
2019: Kakko (2), Bryam (4), Turcotte (5), Broberg (8)
You thought Chuck had a coherent vision too. 3 years away from being 3 years away, same as it ever was.Who knows?
We'll find out in three years.
(1) is the $64K question.
(2) they seem to have a coherent vision
(3) remains to be seen
He had a coherent vision in 2019 (dropped some acid in 2022).You thought Chuck had a coherent vision too. 3 years away from being 3 years away, same as it ever was.
He had a coherent vision in 2019 (dropped some acid in 2022).
He was going to make the moves to get them to the playoffs, which is what he was hired to do.
Need a center, check.
Need quality veteran defensemen, check.
It worked. Wasn't a long-term plan, but he wasn't hired to rebuild or retool but to win now while the window was open for Giroux, Voracek, etc. If Patrick and Lindblom were healthy, might have stayed competitive for another year or two.
He failed in every aspect. There was zero positive under his tenure.If he was hired to contend rather than rebuild than he failed very badly