GDT: 2024-25 other games around the league

PattyLafontaine

Registered User
Apr 5, 2006
2,838
1,219
I hate "the 80s" being used to denigrate Gretzky's numbers, it was a much higher scoring environment yet NO ONE came close to his totals over that time frame


Wayne scored 783 more points than the next leading scorer over the course of the decade, he was the best of all time and is not a product of his era, he lapped his era

Mario was better
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shark Finn

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
1,060
1,637
There's simply no way the Sharks are going to out-tank the Hawks. They're an abomination. We need Nashville, Anaheim, and Montreal to seriously pull it together.
loki-the-avengers.gif

We have a Georgiev
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
10,227
2,375
There's simply no way the Sharks are going to out-tank the Hawks. They're an abomination. We need Nashville, Anaheim, and Montreal to seriously pull it together.

Honestly our best chance of getting bottom 2 is moving Granlund, Kunin, Ceci, and Sturm. Keep Thrun and Rutta and put Muk with Walman.

Celebrini, Granlund, and Walman are too good. Montreal, Anaheim, and Nash are horrifying.

Trade Granny to Nash, they desperately need a playmaking center. Poison pill the deal that if they trade him we get the right to swap 1sts with them.

I really want to keep Granny, but I want a top four pick more.

If Nash can improve, I do think we’re probably worse than Anaheim and MTL, but Nash and Chicago are awful.
 

weastern bias

worst team in the league
Feb 3, 2012
11,872
9,173
SJ
I still believe Nashville will win some stupid games to ruin their draft position late in the season on the pure basis of raw talent, but Chicago, Anaheim and Montreal are all legit contenders for last place

My hunch is the Canadiens finish 32nd, their defense is uniquely bad

I still say we're picking top-5 though


We're 7th worst in xGF/60, 3rd worst in xGA/60 and 2nd worst in xGF%, we're firmly in this fight, lol
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
6,668
12,227
Venice, California
Kakko was scratched. Fourth Period mentions Sharks as one of the possibilities if he’s traded.

I guess I’d be okay with it but we’d need to unload some guys if he was brought in. Like if Kunin or someone goes back, I think he could be interesting with Wennberg but I wouldn’t want to pay a lot.
 

The McMafia

Registered User
Sep 2, 2011
407
83
San Diego, CA
I still believe Nashville will win some stupid games to ruin their draft position late in the season on the pure basis of raw talent, but Chicago, Anaheim and Montreal are all legit contenders for last place

My hunch is the Canadiens finish 32nd, their defense is uniquely bad

I still say we're picking top-5 though


We're 7th worst in xGF/60, 3rd worst in xGA/60 and 2nd worst in xGF%, we're firmly in this fight, lol

I keep looking at the 5-on-5 stats and convincing myself that there is no way Nashville is behind us by year's end, then checking the scores and seeing they lost in regulation. It's incredible.

I just took a look and Nashville's 5v5 numbers are mind boggling. They have only scored 38 5v5 goals and are -21.5 goals under expected on Moneypuck. The Sharks have scored 60!

Nashville is shooting 2.5% during 5v5 play. That has to self-correct at some point.
 

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 12, 2020
1,895
3,257
Kakko was scratched. Fourth Period mentions Sharks as one of the possibilities if he’s traded.
This would be perfect. I'm still very big on him, he was too good when drafted to be in the situation he is right now. Change of scenery and a decent chance should give him a good chance to prove everyone wrong. I believe this could be the real steal at the end of the day, if it happens.
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
1,060
1,637
This would be perfect. I'm still very big on him, he was too good when drafted to be in the situation he is right now. Change of scenery and a decent chance should give him a good chance to prove everyone wrong. I believe this could be the real steal at the end of the day, if it happens.
What would the goal of acquiring him be? He's bigger and more defensively inclined than some of our wingers, but it's pretty clear he's not gonna live up to being the 2019 #2 overall pick. The only point I can see to getting someone like this is if you're trying to find someone with size and good puck retrieval to play with Smith, but I don't know if either of these guys can play LW and it feels like they've abandoned playing Smith at C for this year.

Feels to me more like a deal that would have made more sense last year than this year. I don't want us investing time trying to squeeze more out of a Kakko when the focus should really be on developing Will Smith who has a much higher ceiling than Kakko is ever going to have.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad