Blue Jays Discussion: 2024-25 Off-season: The free agent watch begins (and sometimes old baseball radio broadcasts)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I gotta think they're moving Bo for a haul and installing Jimenez at short. He's not as elite defensively there but still above average. I think he's at least a 2-WAR shortstop without the bat, and if he somehow remembers how to hit you got a 3.5 to 4 WAR shortstop.
Or you could keep Bo as a rental at shortstop this season, then slide Gimenez into that role next year and let Bo walk. I can kind of justify paying Gimenez $10.5 million to be a solid defensive second baseman in 2025, especially knowing that when his salary climbs in 2026 and 2027, he’ll be paid like a shortstop, not a second baseman. Still don’t love the deal, but I guess it makes a bit more sense if they see him as the long-term shortstop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellaine201
If they were willing to sign soto at 46m a year that means we do have a bigger budget as long as it makes the jays competitive every year I am sure Rogers will give them the budget they need.

Soto was a complete separate budget than the normal operating budget.
 
Id be pretty happy with signing Burnes, and two of Santander, Teo, and Alonso. Not sure that’s feasible but it would inject some definite pop into our lineup
 
To be fair, we don't actually have the slightest clue how much they have available to spend. Reports have regularly been way off over the years when reporters try to figure it out.
I'm not too optimistic they will go above the first CBT threshold, but it would be a pleasant surprise if they did.

 
And there are people in here furiously defending this trade lol

This is the same site that says Soto was an overpay for the Yankees? And Teo was an overpay by Seattle? I mean.... sure.

Berrios was an overpay by Toronto. Look through their page, it's very hit and miss.

Also states Chris Sale was a massive overpay by Atlanta.

I would say it's not very reliable for predicting the future outcome of trades.
 
I'm not too optimistic they will go above the first CBT threshold, but it would be a pleasant surprise if they did.


Well if they’re truly in on Burnes and at least one of the big bats they have to be moving Bassett to make it work then.

I haven’t got the impression they don’t want to subtract from the SP group though, so maybe we go into the season above the tax and sell off expirings again to get under if they aren’t competitive.
 
This is the same site that says Soto was an overpay for the Yankees? And Teo was an overpay by Seattle? I mean.... sure.

Berrios was an overpay by Toronto. Look through their page, it's very hit and miss.

Also states Chris Sale was a massive overpay by Atlanta.

I would say it's not very reliable for predicting the future outcome of trades.

1 year of Soto vs multiple cost-controlled years of King+ the prospects they got you can definitely make an argument that the Padres got more value. Teo one is odd. Berrios makes sense since we gave up the guy we took 5th overall like 6 months earlier - their formula must have used the value of a 5th overall pick with max control years, which should be pretty high. Sale was a health gamble.

Basically, don't look at their model as a prediction on how the trade will pan out - look at it as them evaluating the current value of assets exhanged and which party came out ahead based on that current value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aingefan
1 year of Soto vs multiple cost-controlled years of King+ the prospects they got you can definitely make an argument that the Padres got more value. Teo one is odd. Berrios makes sense since we gave up the guy we took 5th overall like 6 months earlier - their formula must have used the value of a 5th overall pick with max control years, which should be pretty high. Sale was a health gamble.

Basically, don't look at their model as a prediction on how the trade will pan out - look at it as them evaluating the current value of assets exhanged and which party came out ahead based on that current value.

Exactly my thoughts. It's a gamble regardless... I have more faith Gimenez continues to be a gold glover than Horwtiz turns into a silver slugger. The rest of the roster not considering, I think they got value not considering salary commitments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kurtz
That seems like a reasonable deal for Cleveland. Decent backend starter/swingman with not great K rates and 2 solid prospects. Not really what we needed, but more in line with Horwitz than salary dump gold glover and meh pen arm



Sad, I wanted them to take a shot on Soroka or Doval
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetsforever
That seems like a reasonable deal for Cleveland. Decent backend starter/swingman with not great K rates and 2 solid prospects. Not really what we needed, but more in line with Horwitz than salary dump gold glover and meh pen arm
The Jays needed a cheap starter more than they needed a defensive specialist at 2B though.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad