2024-25 Kraken Roster discussion

[The Marquis]

13/6 or 12/7?

I thought it was 23 players max(22 is mostly done for some cover in case of injuries) on an active roster which means 13/7 or 12/8 + 2 goalies.

With Fleury being waived I think it's going to be 13/7 unless they can't do it because of financial reasons.

Overall I think Winterton starts in CV given that Hayden got a fully guaranteed $750K deal and no team wants to send those guys down. He's also not a young guy anymore and sitting him in the press box is not going to slow down his development.

So I think it will be:
Forwards:
Beniers, Bjorkstrand, Burakovsky, Eberle, Gourde, Hayden, Kartye, McCann, Schwartz, Stephenson, Tanev, Tolvanen, Wright

Defense:
Dunn, Montour, Larsson, Oleksiak, Evans, Borgen, Mahoura

Goal:
Grubauer, D'Accord

Unfortunately, unless we trade somebody who makes real money away, there’s $750,000ish too few cap dollars to keep 22 players. It’ll have to be 21. Unless somebody gets hurt, of course.

 

[Fistfullofbeer]

The three most likely candidates we would like to move are Schwartz > Tanev > Gourde. Unfortunately, all 3 have M-NTC's and outside of Gourde I just don't see how we move any of those 3. We should definitely try to do something preferably before the 11th (1st road trip) but hopefully atleast before the 28th when we have our 1st long road trip.

The other option ofcourse is moving Tolvy, but I really don't want to do that.

 

[The Marquis]

The three most likely candidates we would like to move are Schwartz > Tanev > Gourde. Unfortunately, all 3 have M-NTC's and outside of Gourde I just don't see how we move any of those 3. We should definitely try to do something preferably before the 11th (1st road trip) but hopefully atleast before the 28th when we have our 1st long road trip.

The other option ofcourse is moving Tolvy, but I really don't want to do that.

For the first time, I think we already have guys on the team who can straight up replace the role those 3 have played in previous seasons. I'm less certain on Schwartz so I'll leave him out of my comments, but I think Kartye and Stephenson pretty much fill in what we'd lose with Tanev and Gourde. I think if you take them both as package deals, the trade off is pretty even, maybe better with the former.

 

[RainyCityHockey]

Unfortunately, unless we trade somebody who makes real money away, there’s $750,000ish too few cap dollars to keep 22 players. It’ll have to be 21. Unless somebody gets hurt, of course.

Thanks for the information.
I stand corrected on this one @gstommylee

The three most likely candidates we would like to move are Schwartz > Tanev > Gourde. Unfortunately, all 3 have M-NTC's and outside of Gourde I just don't see how we move any of those 3. We should definitely try to do something preferably before the 11th (1st road trip) but hopefully atleast before the 28th when we have our 1st long road trip.

The other option ofcourse is moving Tolvy, but I really don't want to do that.

I don't think you trade a center, at this point of the season(or before it starts), especially with two out of your four centers being pretty young.

Gourde, if traded, would also be way more valuable to other teams around the TDL and not at this point with everyone already having build their roster and teams interested(meaning contenders) not able to trade for him without sending back nearly as much money.

I wouldn't mind trading Schwartz or Tanev but I don't really see a market there.

Maybe for Tanev, if you retain some of it, but Schwartz clearly is a negative and needs assets attached to him in order for it to be a possibility of a trade.
Especially with the fact that we're negotiating from a point of weakness with everyone knowing that we need tu cut salary.

For the first time, I think we already have guys on the team who can straight up replace the role those 3 have played in previous seasons. I'm less certain on Schwartz so I'll leave him out of my comments, but I think Kartye and Stephenson pretty much fill in what we'd lose with Tanev and Gourde. I think if you take them both as package deals, the trade off is pretty even, maybe better with the former.

I think unless we have a fantastic season and a clrearly in a playoff spot come TDL, Gourde is our prime trade chip and should bring us something nice in return.

BTW: Overall I'm not sure how the fu*** you're in this kind of financial trouble(to play a full roster) with the kind of talent we have on this team...

 

[gstommylee]

Thanks for the information.
I stand corrected on this one @gstommylee



I don't think you trade a center, at this point of the season(or before it starts), especially with two out of your four centers being pretty young.

Gourde, if traded, would also be way more valuable to other teams around the TDL and not at this point with everyone already having build their roster and teams interested(meaning contenders) not able to trade for him without sending back nearly as much money.

I wouldn't mind trading Schwartz or Tanev but I don't really see a market there.

Maybe for Tanev, if you retain some of it, but Schwartz clearly is a negative and needs assets attached to him in order for it to be a possibility of a trade.
Especially with the fact that we're negotiating from a point of weakness with everyone knowing that we need tu cut salary.



I think unless we have a fantastic season and a clrearly in a playoff spot come TDL, Gourde is our prime trade chip and should bring us something nice in return.

BTW: Overall I'm not sure how the fu*** you're in this kind of financial trouble(to play a full roster) with the kind of talent we have on this team...

gorude with a 23 team no list and 5m cap hit whos way more valuable to stay with the team.

 

[The Marquis]

gorude with a 23 team no list and 5m cap hit whos way more valuable to stay with the team.

That 23 team list is a "yes" list, not a "no" list. so he's in effect got an 8-team no trade list.

Tanev has a 10 team "no" list

Schwartz has a No Trade List now instead of a full no move clause, but I don't see any info about how many teams can be on it.