Toggle sidebar

2024-25 Kraken Roster discussion

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
kihei said:
I wasn't impressed the way he handled Wright's first year, that's for sure. Last year, the team collectively did not seem to play hard every night the way that they had in the past. In fact it had been, to my way of thinking, a point of pride how hard the team played in its first two years. Last year too many times, they just seemed to mail it in. It made too many games, especially in the second half of the season, an absolute chore to watch. I have no way of knowing but it seemed Hakstol lost the room. Plus, if you are the GM, you can't have your team playing listless hockey, especially at home. I thank Hakstol for his contributions, but I also think it was time for a change. We just couldn't risk another year like the last one.
Click to expand...

Pretty much my thoughts as well.

However, I do think Hak may have lost the room, but not in a "f*** this!" manner, but more of a "why bother?" manner. The former is much worse, because I don't think you come back from that for a while because it means not only a coaching change, but probably means having to move a good number of higher profile players to find the room again (think Winnipeg a couple of years ago as being an example). I don't think the Kraken players were ever "f*** this!". They just didn't have the motivating factor of the first two season, because the coach was simply the wrong guy to get a team through "why bother?". He just doesn't come off as a guy who could turn the commitment around if it is ever lost and it clearly was. I do think Bylsma has the personality to be able to get things turned about from a buy-in perspective.

That all said, I don't think Hakstol was a mistake, he just wasn't the right guy for the team at the point he was fired. It's not like many head coaches in the NHL last 3 full seasons with the same club anyway. He did fine, but Francis moving on from him was 100% the right move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei and Fistfullofbeer
So….


Who do you all think gets traded away to make thr salary cap? But more importantly, what do we gain/lose to move that player.

Sadly, Columbus hasn’t met the floor and has some needs. Maybe they need a player like Gourde?
 
Ok. Let’s look WAY into this JVR rumor… what about Schwartz? That seems like a very realistic move. His full NMC looks to have turned into a M-NTC over the summer. Looking at other players in that position in our depth chart, I couldn’t imagine them moving McCann, and losing Kartye isn’t enough of a cap hit to make up for the need when adding even 1 player. There’s also Tolvanen, but I’d not like that too much.
 
The Marquis said:
Ok. Let’s look WAY into this JVR rumor… what about Schwartz? That seems like a very realistic move. His full NMC looks to have turned into a M-NTC over the summer. Looking at other players in that position in our depth chart, I couldn’t imagine them moving McCann, and losing Kartye isn’t enough of a cap hit to make up for the need when adding even 1 player. There’s also Tolvanen, but I’d not like that too much.
Click to expand...
The 3 names that I thought of were Tanev, Gourde or Schwartz. Schwartz makes the most sense to me, but I don't know how hard it would be to move him. He is oft injured, and has another season after this on his contract.

McCann is pretty much part of our current core. Don't see us moving him. Tolvanen would be the easiest to move, so they may be forced to move him if no other offers present themselves for the other players.

Gourde is another player we could move but doing so without knowing if Wright is ready for 3C would be a risk.

Don't know if any buyout windows are open before season start, but maybe they buyout Schwartz or Tanev?
 
What might be, in effect, a JVR for Tolvanen trade sounds like a really bad idea to me. I hope we don't go that route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Marquis
kihei said:
What might be, in effect, a JVR for Tolvanen trade sounds like a really bad idea to me. I hope we don't go that route.
Click to expand...

I think Tolvanen is already better than present day JVR so, yeah, that would be a step backwards. JVR is bound to be much cheaper though.

McCann-Beniers-Bjorkstrand
Wright-Stephenson-Burakovsky
Tolvanen-Gourde-Eberle
JVR-Kartye-Tanev

Maybe something like could work. They would need to move out Schwartz. He is the odd man out anyway since Tanev is a bottom-6 player and Schwartz is not really meant for a role like that. JVR would be cheaper and a better option than either Tanev or Schwartz in that bottom-6 role.

But something has got to give IF we are to actually sign JVR. He also needs to be ok playing a role on the 4th line.
 
I'm just fine if the odd man out is Schwartz. And if it's Tanev, I can live with that.
 
The Marquis said:
So….


Who do you all think gets traded away to make thr salary cap? But more importantly, what do we gain/lose to move that player.

Sadly, Columbus hasn’t met the floor and has some needs. Maybe they need a player like Gourde?
Click to expand...

Trading guys to Columbus would most likely be a cap dump.

There's no way I see Gourde being that and I doubt that Columbus, after sadly losing Gaudreau, is looking to go for it and trade away prospects and or picks for anyone.

Schwartz still has two more years left and would cost us at least a 2nd rounder + to get out of his contract.

So I think Tanev is the only guy that would make sense and at least not cost us assets to get rid off.l
 
RainyCityHockey said:
Trading guys to Columbus would most likely be a cap dump.

There's no way I see Gourde being that and I doubt that Columbus, after sadly losing Gaudreau, is looking to go for it and trade away prospects and or picks for anyone.

Schwartz still has two more years left and would cost us at least a 2nd rounder + to get out of his contract.

So I think Tanev is the only guy that would make sense and at least not cost us assets to get rid off.l
Click to expand...

I think Tanev ordinarily would cost a bit to move at this point. I'm not sure if Columbus would take him for free.

Schwartz would certainly cost a pretty penny to move at this time, maybe a couple 2nds.

gstommylee said:
here's a thought seattle goes 13/6/2 if we don't move anyone
Click to expand...

I've seen teams do 12/7/2 a lot.

13/6/2 is an issue when a D goes down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Renopucker
majormajor said:
Are the Kraken improved?
Click to expand...
From last season? Most certainly.

Montour alone makes us much better. Having Dunn and Montour on the ice for almost 50 minutes a game should have a big impact.

I know people are low on Stephenson but I am interested in seeing how he does first. The north-south game that he brings is aligned with Bylsma's style and also something that could complement Burakovsky well.

I am not banking on Wright to be overly productive but I can see him chipping in 35-40 points on the 3rd line which would give us much added depth scoring.

How much better, remains to be seen. But I am pretty sure the team will come out hard. Having a new coach does that and seeing Francis add Montour and Stephenson to the roster unequivocally signals to them that management believes in them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevinsane
Damn, there are six forwards on that list that I have never heard of.
 
Good to see Jack LaFontaine coming to camp - I don't think he'll be an NHL star or anything at this point, but I loved his game at UMN (and he was solid in KC and CV last year).
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Marquis
1726722587944.png


group setup (subject to possible change tomorrow) for camp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bear of Bad News and The Marquis
Where do we think Schwartz fits in this season? Our top-6 is certain to have Beniers, Stephenson, McCann, Bjorkstrand. I see Burakovsky on Stephenson's line since they would complement each other. I can see Schwartz as 2LW but I think Tolvy is a better choice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom