nope!! if they are NA and not on rosters they can not be picked up till the media says they will be recalled--I call this the Archangel rule--been dragged to the carpet a few times becuase of it---I believe I was given 24 hours to cut the players each time or the comish would do it for me--so lets see if the same rules apply to Balls
Did I say thank you for gifting me the goalie? I was going to take the Seattle guy--but the goalie is all rightYeah...
I was wondering about that myself.
Just curious...
Is there a time limit before the owner has to rectify these types of moves?
I think it might be wise to establish a time line.
Also...
Happy Thanksgiving y'all.
I just hope my 1st overall pick will stick for the whole season.
no more IR spots
The longer he holds them, the longer he has a player that doesn't help him. Unless it's viewed as tanking this is punishment in itself, imo.Yeah...
I was wondering about that myself.
Just curious...
Is there a time limit before the owner has to rectify these types of moves?
I think it might be wise to establish a time line.
Also...
Happy Thanksgiving y'all.
I just hope my 1st overall pick will stick for the whole season.
flag on the play--you told me to drop NA players last year--I added 2 players about 5 days before they were actually added and you told me to drop them or you would--how is what Balls doing different?
Balls has been notified via this thread to drop them, I don't wish to do it on my own and give time for GMs to make the changes themselves, like I did for you.
only VIA the draft can NA's be kept. This came up when I was nit picking the rookie rules. Say if Holloway gets sent down--I can keep him on my roster because I drafted him. If you draft a player that is one thing but adding them is something else
you are trying to do what I did last year and lost the argument several times
Maybe if you added them before they were sent down? That's a grey area that I think we technically don't allow, but maybe you could make a case. Does anyone know how Yahoo treats rookies who are unlikely to make the roster but haven't been sent down yet? Were these two N/A before cut day, or did they only become N/A after being sent down?
no grey area--this is why I am calling it the Archangel rule--it was clearly stated--if they were drafted and sent down they could be kept but players added who are NA can not be kept---I kept pushing my luck on it last year
Yes, but if he picked them up before they were sent down (he didn't) then they shouldn't have been N/A. We should be able to add rookies that are still in camp who are fighting for a roster spot. It's a moot point if Yahoo had them as Active, but if Yahoo marked them as NA for some reason (maybe based on last years end of season status?) then that is an error on Yahoo's part which we our rules already accommodate. They state "unless there is confirmed news that the player is becoming active (e.g. called up, activated from injured reserve, served the last day of their suspension)." If a player is in camp, and hasn't been sent down yet, then they are as "Active" as any other "Called Up".
