Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
19,415
14,670
southern cal
My gut tells me that verbeek is going to make a big big splash soon for a top 6 forward. Tell me im crazy?

I don't think Verbeek is going to make that happen. I think it all depends on a team willing to depart with a top-6 forward or any other top talent. Verbeek didn't make the Cutter deal happen; the Flyers' org made that happen. Verbeek didn't make the Trouba deal happen; the Rangers org made that happen. Verbeek was able to take advantage of those two situations.

The question is, "Which team with a top-6 forward is willing to change direction with team to trade away said player?"

@GiveYouABagOfPucks did posit Tage Thompson, but I dunno if Buffalo wants to continue their perpetual rebuild since they haven't been to the playoffs since 2011.
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,648
2,490
I don't think Verbeek is going to make that happen. I think it all depends on a team willing to depart with a top-6 forward or any other top talent. Verbeek didn't make the Cutter deal happen; the Flyers' org made that happen. Verbeek didn't make the Trouba deal happen; the Rangers org made that happen. Verbeek was able to take advantage of those two situations.

The question is, "Which team with a top-6 forward is willing to change direction with team to trade away said player?"

@GiveYouABagOfPucks did posit Tage Thompson, but I dunno if Buffalo wants to continue their perpetual rebuild since they haven't been to the playoffs since 2011.
Kreider got scratched today.
 

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,486
3,173
OC
If they have a deal in place I could see them scratching him until the deadline is over.

They cant make a deal but the GMs can negotiate and come to terms.

Exactly. If a trade has been agreed to, the other GM could ask that he not play. Once roster freeze is over, they announce the trade. If thats whats going on and given the Rangers track record, that seems to make sense
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,648
2,490
Exactly. If a trade has been agreed to, the other GM could ask that he not play. Once roster freeze is over, they announce the trade. If thats whats going on and given the Rangers track record, that seems to make sense
It’s very possible when our scouts were at the rangers games a few weeks ago, that not only were we eyeing trouba, but Kreider as well
 

MCB

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
1,022
1,196
My gut tells me that verbeek is going to make a big big splash soon for a top 6 forward. Tell me im crazy?
I think he will make a big big splash for what he thinks is a top six forward. I honestly feel if he trades it will be for someone middle of the pack that won't tip the scales and we will have another killorn on our roster.

Edit: I would love to be wrong about this though
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbieboy3686

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,651
18,890
Worst Case, Ontario
Why, exactly, do people want Kreider, unless he’s being given away?

I can very much see both sides of this one.

On one hand, we struggle badly to score - and this guy has 52, 39 and 36 goals over the past three seasons, along with another 24 goals in 43 playoff games over that span. Even this year in a down year, he has more goals than our leading scorer and is pacing for 30.

The concerns are obvious though. Those numbers above pretty clearly declining and that's always cause for alarm when a player soon turns 34. He makes significant money and with term remaining. How many perceived problems can we take from NY before we end up with the actual problem?

Clearly has a bit of a rock bottom situation going on with the healthy scratch today. I sort of expect some level of bounceback there, which is where I find myself with lukewarm interest. Would be nice to fall into a 30-35 goal guy for the next couple years, if he's still capable
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
54,967
34,374
Long Beach, CA
75pt last season Kreider imho is what we will get once he leaves a toxic situation.
He’s a soon to be 34 year old power forward who’s been injured this year, isn’t much of a hitter, and isn’t producing on a MUCH better team.

The idea is to have fewer Killorn’s, not more.

Let’s not pretend this locker room doesn’t have issues.
 

Hey234

Registered User
Sponsor
May 7, 2010
1,006
1,611
Southern California
He’s a soon to be 34 year old power forward who’s been injured this year, isn’t much of a hitter, and isn’t producing on a MUCH better team.

The idea is to have fewer Killorn’s, not more.

Let’s not pretend this locker room doesn’t have issues.

If the Ducks did a swap for him and Killorn, I would do that. However, I agree, he doesn't make sense for assets needed to get him and it's a short term solution. The Ducks need to be patient and wait for the next, high end forward to become available push hard for him.
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,648
2,490
is this the same gut that told you LaCombe was going to SD and had no future here??
I said that I think he’s first up of the young dmen to be traded given all the lhd we have. I actually think that’s still the case. But he is trending up to actually having good trade value now, if we do go that route. Another 20 games or so, and I’ll be fully bought in on him being a legit nhl dman
 

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,982
3,690
Ducks
So who would you like PV to add after Christmas and what do we realistically think it would take to acquire that player.
 

KelVarnsen

Registered User
May 2, 2010
11,029
5,401
Mission Viejo
So who would you like PV to add after Christmas and what do we realistically think it would take to acquire that player.
I would like him to acquire a new coaching staff before he trades away players. But if you forced me to trade a young player for someone, it would be McTavish. Truthfully, I'm not sure who he would even bring back to the Ducks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11Justin93

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad