It'll hurt blokes to admit it, but the game should have been worse if not for Jarry.
To add to this, I know I am most definitely the only one that even backs Jarry at this point, even though I still would like to see him moved if not just to see him thrive and the fact that it'd be less annoying here to hear about him so negatively all the time - also Blomqvist, Murashov, etc being in the pipeline.
Also I think if they did move him, Larsson and Ned would be fine, wouldn't be shocked to see Larsson out play Ned.
But in any case just because it still annoys me - bad goalies are bad almost all the time, not great for months and then bad for a month and a half or so, that has more to do with the team than the player imo. Jarry from the start to end of December was a top 5 goalie with his save percentage, etc, he maintained a good one on average until the end of February, around the 24th he was still a top 10 goalie with a .916 sv% (played in 37 of the 54 Pens games up to that point). Even Ned was putting up pretty good numbers at that point with a .915 sv%
But from Feb 25 - April 18th - Both were absolute ass.
Also a reminder, up to this same point - Saros was a 2.95 GAA and .904sv% and Vasilevskiy was a 2.95 GAA and a .897 sv%...
So are they shit too? Or nah, because bad goalies are definitely not good consistently for most of their season, not be pretty f***ing good for months and then not for about a month and a bit.
I'm not sure why Ned even wanted to come back, too bad Jarry didn't get moved to prove he isn't the problem under a Sully coached shit show.