- Apr 25, 2006
- 52,238
- 56,567
That's awesome for the Sharks. Damn their rebuild is going well.
Celebrini
Smith
Dickinson
Askarov
JFC
That's awesome for the Sharks. Damn their rebuild is going well.
In only 2 years of rebuilding he got a potential all star 1C, a potential middle of the road 1C, a potential 1D and a potential 1GDo we shit on Grier or not here, I'm confused.
I'm making jokes.In only 2 years of rebuild he got a potential all star 1C, a potential middle of the road 1C, a potential 1D and a potential 1G
and there's a decent chance that all these players reach their ceiling.
Shoud have pulled the trigger.So odds are Edstrom and ~20th pick for Askarov and a 3rd. Ritchie + 1st is a the rough equivalent here. Nashville got good value in a tough situation, San Jose got the player with the much higher ceiling.
Sherwood and Aman on the fourth line for cheap. Too bad they never got a shot here and Bednar insisted on playing guys like Jost and Kaut and OO who clearly had no NHL future.
Such a good GM for being able to tear it down and be lucky in a lotteryIn only 2 years of rebuilding he got a potential all star 1C, a potential middle of the road 1C, a potential 1D and a potential 1G
and there's a decent chance that all these players reach their ceiling.
Yup, Trotz got quite a bit here... especially as unproven as Askarov is.basically the same value as Ullmark/Kuemper trades which are the two biggest goalie trade returns I can think on in recent memory.
I strongly disagree. It's hard to move old ass players and it's even harder to move long contracts with high AAV. When you combine old + high AAV + long contracts it's borderline unmovable but he still did it.Such a good GM for being able to tear it down and be lucky in a lottery
Still has done awful job with his trades, aside from maybe this one. We don't know what the other teams were offering, but it's a steep price IMO considering the situation. If Askarov hits, well worth it of course.
Poor guy would be going from a team trying not to tank, to one unintentionally tanking.Watch askarov demand a trade in a few years of tanking. AVSkarov is still alive.
Anyone could've moved Hertl and EK65 after the season he had and by retaining more, might've actually gotten proper value. Funny, how you are criticizing the Columbus ownership in the Around the league thread for taking poor value of Laine by not retaining, while Grier absolutely botched the value of Hertl and EK65 by doing some mickey mouse retentions that last for multiple years, taking up valuable retention slots that could also be used in brokering other deals. Maybe that was the ownership, who knows.I strongly disagree. It's hard to move old ass players and it's even harder to move long contracts with high AAV. When you combine old + high AAV + long contracts it's borderline unmovable but he still did it.
I really like the demolition job that Grier has done considering the absolute shitshow that he inherited.
I'm anticipating that the Ducks and Sharks in 3-4 years will make the Avs west coast trips miserable.Poor guy would be going from a team trying not to tank, to one unintentionally tanking.
How could hanging out at EJ's Newport Beach place for a few days be miserable?I'm anticipating that the Ducks and Sharks in 3-4 years will make the Avs west coast trips miserable.
Dude, Laine's contract expires at age 28 (2 years left). EK at age 37 (had 5 years left). Hertl at age 36 (had over 6 years left).Anyone could've moved Hertl and EK65 after the season he had and by retaining more, might've actually gotten proper value. Funny, how you are criticizing the Columbus ownership in the Around the league thread for taking poor value of Laine by not retaining, while Grier absolutely botched the value of Hertl and EK65 by doing some mickey mouse retentions that last for multiple years, taking up valuable retention slots that could also be used in brokering other deals. Maybe that was the ownership, who knows.
I do think the Sharks are moving well with their rebuild. But I think they could be even further along, if they had a smarter GM than Grier. Tearing down a team is pretty easy in the end. Then you just hope for lottery luck, which they got.
The Sharks did the right thing getting rid of those players, sure. But those trades were awful for the Sharks. They still retain some salary, so they are not completely out of them, and they are spending multiple years on valuable retention slots. And they did not get proper assets, because they didn't retain more. They half-assed the whole thing.Dude, Laine's contract expires at age 28 (2 years left). EK at age 37 (had 5 years left). Hertl at age 36 (had over 6 years left).
The situations aren't the same at all.
The Pens and Vegas got f***ed, not the Sharks.
The Sharks could have but projecting that you won't need the cap space for 4-5 years down the line is a lot tougher than 2 years.The Sharks did the right thing getting rid of those players, sure. But those trades were awful for the Sharks. They still retain some salary, so they are not completely out of them, and they are spending multiple years on valuable retention slots. And they did not get proper assets, because they didn't retain more. They half-assed the whole thing.
You either get out of those contracts in their entirety (which the Blue Jackets did with Laine) OR you retain like 50% and get a shit ton of assets. Now they did neither.
Do we shit on Grier or not here, I'm confused.