- Oct 24, 2008
- 25,993
- 43,497
We need a banger Kessel + Phaneuf proposal from @Drury_Sakic right about now.
I'm equating injury to what happened with Val because they both result in the same thing - the player is suddenly and unexpectedly unavailable. The rest is all subjective.
As was already pointed out, the fact that the Seattle series even went to game 7 is the problem. Yes, Nuke could have made a difference in both series. No one is disputing that. I'm disputing the narrative that he was the main factor in losing those series, which is what is implied when anyone claims he cost the team two wasted years. I see that idea all the time around here. Yeah, his actions were a factor, but again, if one top six winger is the difference between winning and losing, there are more problems than just him.
I get why you'd be angry about this, and if your view of drug addicts is they are selfish pieces of shit, then it makes some sense. But that's not the only way to look at it. Heck, lots of people think Nuke was only playing so well because of the drugs - maybe he thought he was actually helping the team, and never expected to get caught. It's not like the NHL has a strong history of catching people for drug use.
I don't think it takes any extraordinary leadership to say something like, "OK guys, I know this sucks. I know a lot of you are angry. But nothing outside this room matters. We have to find a way to win with the people in this room. It's next man up. Let's go!"
Now, that alone wouldn't do it. You would need a strong culture already in place, and the person saying that would need to be a leader everyone respects. Being able to adjust to sudden changes and roll with the punches is something this team had during the cup run.
Maybe we disagree on this, but I thought that third suspension was based more reputation than anything else. In any case, are you trying to say that it was the right move for the Leafs to trade Kadri? Because that's my point. I believes it was a mistake for the Leafs to trade Kadri based on a narrative, just as it would be a mistake for the Avs to trade Nuke based on a narrative.
I think you're confusing correlation with causation. We don't know why MacKinnon started slumping at that time. Maybe he was dealing with an injury. Maybe he was tired. Maybe he had something going on in his personal life. Maybe it was bad luck. To act like Nuke is the only possible reason for this slump is a sign that you're replaced your logical thinking with this narrative you have going.
Alternate theory: Bednar believes that the team isn't going anywhere this season with Annunen as their starter. He has seen Georgiev play well in the past, and since he's not the GM, his only choice it to try his best to rehabilitate Georgiev's game. So, when the team plays really well in front of Annunen and he has a good game, Bednar decides to put Georgiev in net and hopes the team plays as well with him in as they did with Annunen.
Plus, let's imagine CMac recognizes the issue and is working the phone trying to trade away Georgiev and get a new starter. Would it help or hurt the GM if the head coach is repeatedly criticizing the player he is trying to trade?
I'm not saying that my theory is right, but what you're saying is not the only way to interpret events.
They'd be pretty stupid to trade him... he's made a lot of progress over the past 2 years.Wonder what it would take to pry Kesselring out of Utah
Hey yall. Any updates on Landeskog? Been stashing him on IR in my fantasy league and was wondering if it’s even worth it. Haven’t found much info so I figured I’d hit up the COL HF insiders.
I was assuming that the heavy knock he took on his knee in that collision is still somewhat bothering himEveryone gets in a slump sometimes. The season is a long grind.
I don't buy into any story behind Mack. He's a dawg not a machine.
Gotta say, as much as some people think Mack’s slumping started when Nume came back, I think that’s off.
My guess: he started slumping because the team got bad news from Landy. The timeline lines up perfectly with the last time he was on the ice on November 12th.
I was assuming that the heavy knock he took on his knee in that collision is still somewhat bothering him
They've had to amputate. Sell sell sell.Hey yall. Any updates on Landeskog? Been stashing him on IR in my fantasy league and was wondering if it’s even worth it. Haven’t found much info so I figured I’d hit up the COL HF insiders.
For sure. Tons of reasons why he may be a bit down. That’s why I think it’s a foolish game to even attempt to lay the struggle to one specific thing with literally no evidence.People seem deadest on making the inference that he has a grievance against Nichushkin’s presence on the team. And that might be true. But it also might be true that he’s allowed himself to exhale once reinforcements arrived. The first 10 games of the season, the Avs scored enough to be 8-2 or 9-1. But because of bad goaltending. Because of the bad goaltending and guys being on injury/suspension holiday, the top guys were doing a huge chunk of heavy lifting. Because of the bad goaltending, they’re still logging heavy minutes. And even though and because they’re logging heavy minutes, they might be internally doing load mgt by regulating their amount of exertion to a degree.
I’d take Caleb Jones back over all of CdH/Kylie/Lud.
I’d take Caleb Jones back over all of CdH/Kylie/Lud.
I'd do it, especially if we can talk to Blackwood's agent and get a sense there's a good chance of re-signing him. Then we could move Girard in the offseason if Ferraro looks good and Kylington keeps playing well if/when he returns from injury.Georgiev + 2026 1st for Blackwood and Ferraro. Yay or nay?
I’d take Caleb Jones back over all of CdH/Kylie/Lud.
You can take Blackwood, i take that FerrariGeorgiev + 2026 1st for Blackwood and Ferraro. Yay or nay?
San Jose says no. Why do they throw in Ferraro?Georgiev + 2026 1st for Blackwood and Ferraro. Yay or nay?
Georgiev + 2026 1st for Blackwood and Ferraro. Yay or nay?
San Jose says no. Why do they throw in Ferraro?