Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | The Slow Crawl to the Season

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
If by some miracle Mikko is willing to sign in Ottawa, I'd do the deal all day. We get a player the same size, 3 years younger, who already scores at a point per game pace on a crap team and is under team control for 3 more years . He's also the team captain and plays with type of physicality the Avs lack in their top 6 with Landy out. His contract runs out the same year as Toews. I'd also argue that while Mikko is obviously a great player, the difference in scoring between him and Tkachuk could potentially just be playing with MacKinnon, and if we made the swap their point totals could swap as well.

Meanwhile, as you point out, with Tkachuk's 8.2M vs Mikko's 12+M, we could put that money towards a goalie and/or more depth. We could then offer the money to sign whoever ends up as UFA that we want between guys like Thompson, Vejmelka, Daccord, Blackwood, or Hill, or make a trade for someone like Gibson.

Good points
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkT
It's disgusting that 4Giev is getting the start tonight. How can JB be so dumb, the team doesn't even play the same infront of him
We need to up his trade value which on the other hand is a slippery slope...

Couple wins and then pull the trigger if possible.
 
It's disgusting that 4Giev is getting the start tonight. How can JB be so dumb, the team doesn't even play the same infront of him
How on earth do so many of you keep placing the goalie mess on Bednar. This is all CMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serenity19
How on earth do so many of you keep placing the goalie mess on Bednar. This is all CMac.

It goes like this: Annunen stepped in and was doing ok for several games. Then Bednar shoehorned Georgiev back into the lineup for several games causing Annunen to lose his rhythm. Then when Annunen struggled, he was scapegoated and shipped out. And along the way, Bednar was critical of Annunen but blindly defends Georgiev.
 
How on earth do so many of you keep placing the goalie mess on Bednar. This is all CMac.
He keeps playing George when there's other options and defends the shit out of him in the post game interviews. Any other goalie he calls them out
 
It goes like this: Annunen stepped in and was doing ok for several games. Then Bednar shoehorned Georgiev back into the lineup for several games causing Annunen to lose his rhythm. Then when Annunen was struggled, he was scapegoated and shipped out. And along the way, Bednar was critical of Annunen but blindly defends Georgiev.
100%
You don't play a career backup in both games of a back to back. Come on, now.
Why not, JB plays the trio 25+ minutes a night even on back to backs. Avs need to win games now. If cmac trades for a goalie at the deadline the Avs might not even be in a playoff spot at that point
 
He keeps playing George when there's other options and defends the shit out of him in the post game interviews. Any other goalie he calls them out
By "other options" you mean Scott Wedgewood? Or before that the also terrible Annunen? Come on, now. You're demonstrating my point. Some of you keep acting as if Bednar has a plethora of quality other options he just refuses to turn to. In reality, each of his options is absolute shit. 100% of the blame here falls on management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mighty Makar
100%

Why not, JB plays the trio 25+ minutes a night even on back to backs. Avs need to win games now. If cmac trades for a goalie at the deadline the Avs might not even be in a playoff spot at that point
Do you realize that even the best starters in this league don't play back to backs? Even historic greats didn't, but you want Scott Wedgewood to?
 
Do you realize that even the best starters in this league don't play back to backs? Even historic greats didn't, but you want Scott Wedgewood to?

I'd play him again, though not both games. Clearly he earned the next start..

I guess you can make the argument it's less likely Detroit lights up 4Giev than NJ, but I'd rather get the team back on track.
 
We do need some points
Points——————————Goalie
IMG_3223.gif
 
Really they're just trying to retool already and Cmac hasn't told anyone he's tanking the season. Except Mikko found out and is refusing to sign now.
Also they’ve fired Bednar but he’s still behind the bench, he’s just not getting paid
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CobraAcesS

Always makes me laugh when agents/GM's leak that he'd be "getting a higher AAV on the open market" for older UFA's that sign max term.

It's 7 years instead of 8 and he's going to be 38. At the end of his career he's taking home more money with the lower AAV and the 8th year, he's not doing the team a favor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche
I don't agree. Sure, no one can see the future but you can't seriously equate a random injury that can accidentally happen to ANY player to how Val dropped out of the playoffs the last 2 years? One is an unfortunate part of the game where his teammates say "ahh dammit" the other his teammates say "WTF did he just do?"

I really don't understand how anyone could really spin it the way you are right now.... is this for real? I mean it happened the first time against Seattle a series that we lost in Game #7 by 1 goal. You don't think a Top-6 forward the way he's able to perform in the playoffs COULD have been the difference between winning and losing that series?

Then he comes back and apparently - all is forgiven - and personally my thoughts were 'he's going to be awesome, he's gonna wanna make up for last year' and what does he do? The complete opposite, he f***ING BRITNEY SPEARS US and woops he does it AGAIN... and you point to lack of leadership for this team being in COMPLETE DISBELIEF that this selfish piece of shit could screw over what they have worked for all year AGAIN, 2 years in a row with the same f***ing bullshit???
I'm equating injury to what happened with Val because they both result in the same thing - the player is suddenly and unexpectedly unavailable. The rest is all subjective.

As was already pointed out, the fact that the Seattle series even went to game 7 is the problem. Yes, Nuke could have made a difference in both series. No one is disputing that. I'm disputing the narrative that he was the main factor in losing those series, which is what is implied when anyone claims he cost the team two wasted years. I see that idea all the time around here. Yeah, his actions were a factor, but again, if one top six winger is the difference between winning and losing, there are more problems than just him.
Then he comes back and apparently - all is forgiven - and personally my thoughts were 'he's going to be awesome, he's gonna wanna make up for last year' and what does he do? The complete opposite, he f***ING BRITNEY SPEARS US and woops he does it AGAIN... and you point to lack of leadership for this team being in COMPLETE DISBELIEF that this selfish piece of shit could screw over what they have worked for all year AGAIN, 2 years in a row with the same f***ing bullshit???
I get why you'd be angry about this, and if your view of drug addicts is they are selfish pieces of shit, then it makes some sense. But that's not the only way to look at it. Heck, lots of people think Nuke was only playing so well because of the drugs - maybe he thought he was actually helping the team, and never expected to get caught. It's not like the NHL has a strong history of catching people for drug use.
There's no Mark Messier-Gordie Howe-Joe Sakic frankenstein NHL Captain monster that is going to make that entire team believe that 'hey, everything is fine'.
I don't think it takes any extraordinary leadership to say something like, "OK guys, I know this sucks. I know a lot of you are angry. But nothing outside this room matters. We have to find a way to win with the people in this room. It's next man up. Let's go!"

Now, that alone wouldn't do it. You would need a strong culture already in place, and the person saying that would need to be a leader everyone respects. Being able to adjust to sudden changes and roll with the punches is something this team had during the cup run.
The whole Kadri argument holds no water for me. Just because he was traded here and ended winning the Cup on a team as deep as the Avs were in 2022, doesn't take away from any of the THREE playoff suspensions he had with the Leafs AND the Avs in the four years prior where he became unavailable to his team to continue to compete for the Cup. He didn't get suspended in the 2022 playoffs - it's a miracle ! Bravo ! Is that the standard now?
Maybe we disagree on this, but I thought that third suspension was based more reputation than anything else. In any case, are you trying to say that it was the right move for the Leafs to trade Kadri? Because that's my point. I believes it was a mistake for the Leafs to trade Kadri based on a narrative, just as it would be a mistake for the Avs to trade Nuke based on a narrative.

Finally, I feel like I'm the only one who can see Bruce Willis. WTF am I really the only one seeing MacKinnon's game gone from 'MVP Mack' to 'pre-Duchene Trade Mack' since November 15th ???

I don't think we're winning anything without MVP Mack.
I think you're confusing correlation with causation. We don't know why MacKinnon started slumping at that time. Maybe he was dealing with an injury. Maybe he was tired. Maybe he had something going on in his personal life. Maybe it was bad luck. To act like Nuke is the only possible reason for this slump is a sign that you're replaced your logical thinking with this narrative you have going.

It goes like this: Annunen stepped in and was doing ok for several games. Then Bednar shoehorned Georgiev back into the lineup for several games causing Annunen to lose his rhythm. Then when Annunen struggled, he was scapegoated and shipped out. And along the way, Bednar was critical of Annunen but blindly defends Georgiev.
Alternate theory: Bednar believes that the team isn't going anywhere this season with Annunen as their starter. He has seen Georgiev play well in the past, and since he's not the GM, his only choice it to try his best to rehabilitate Georgiev's game. So, when the team plays really well in front of Annunen and he has a good game, Bednar decides to put Georgiev in net and hopes the team plays as well with him in as they did with Annunen.

Plus, let's imagine CMac recognizes the issue and is working the phone trying to trade away Georgiev and get a new starter. Would it help or hurt the GM if the head coach is repeatedly criticizing the player he is trying to trade?

I'm not saying that my theory is right, but what you're saying is not the only way to interpret events.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad