Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | The Slow Crawl to the Season

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.

Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
 
These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.

Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
It's not just the savings, it's also preventing them to go elsewhere... Especially for a team like Columbus.
 
These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.

Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
Yeah like Makar...
 
These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.

Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
It’s just the trend now. Locking up young guys early to try and get a discount. And with most of the guys getting it, it makes sense because their contention lives and dies by these guys.
 
These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.

Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
It would be close to $3-6 mil more in a few years with the cap going up and comparables.
 
It’s just the trend now. Locking up young guys early to try and get a discount. And with most of the guys getting it, it makes sense because their contention lives and dies by these guys.
Yeah but we did that with Girard, and it ended up being a (mostly) fair price for him. The level of play for whatever Girard makes being fair is a lot different than 8.5 for 8 years.
 
Yeah but we did that with Girard, and it ended up being a (mostly) fair price for him. The level of play for whatever Girard makes being fair is a lot different than 8.5 for 8 years.
I mean Faber had significantly higher upside than Girard had/has.
 
Makar got $500k more and was a point per game defenseman.
Makars was 2% more of the cap than Fabers will be though.

Idk I don’t really see the issue in locking him up long term. He put up 47pts and is capable of playing all situations at a pretty high level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AslanRH
Makar got $500k more and was a point per game defenseman.
Bought 1 UFA year (Makar) vs 4 UFA years (Faber). This shit matters a lot.

Plus the cap is significantly higher now than back then.
 
Time will tell if they jumped the gun with Faber but I’m reasonably confident that long-term deal will work out much better than the one Buffalo did with Owen Power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dahrougem2
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.