Ceremony
How I choose to feel is how I am
- Jun 8, 2012
- 114,291
- 17,360
Sorry that was not caring what the green filth do with their contracts, not aimed at you.Don’t get your panties in a bunch.
Sorry that was not caring what the green filth do with their contracts, not aimed at you.Don’t get your panties in a bunch.
All good.Sorry that was not caring what the green filth do with their contracts, not aimed at you.
It's not just the savings, it's also preventing them to go elsewhere... Especially for a team like Columbus.These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.
Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
Yeah like Makar...These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.
Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
It’s just the trend now. Locking up young guys early to try and get a discount. And with most of the guys getting it, it makes sense because their contention lives and dies by these guys.These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.
Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
It would be close to $3-6 mil more in a few years with the cap going up and comparables.These GMs never learn. Paying these young defensemen $8+mil long term is just so unnecessary. Even if he plays like a 1D for the next couple of seasons, you pay him about the same, maybe a bit more. Taking a huge risk to save $1-2mil a year? Silly.
Sens did it with Chabot, and Oilers did it with Nurse.
Yeah but we did that with Girard, and it ended up being a (mostly) fair price for him. The level of play for whatever Girard makes being fair is a lot different than 8.5 for 8 years.It’s just the trend now. Locking up young guys early to try and get a discount. And with most of the guys getting it, it makes sense because their contention lives and dies by these guys.
I mean Faber had significantly higher upside than Girard had/has.Yeah but we did that with Girard, and it ended up being a (mostly) fair price for him. The level of play for whatever Girard makes being fair is a lot different than 8.5 for 8 years.
sucks they turned a complete bum into a top pair d man and a 1st round pick
Death, taxes, @Chiarelli 's pure hatred of Fiala.sucks they turned a complete bum into a top pair d man and a 1st round pick
Makar got $500k more and was a point per game defenseman.Yeah like Makar...
Makars was 2% more of the cap than Fabers will be though.Makar got $500k more and was a point per game defenseman.
Because it'll be really funny if it doesn't work outIdk I don’t really see the issue in locking him up long term.
Like when we signed Nuke long termBecause it'll be really funny if it doesn't work out
Bought 1 UFA year (Makar) vs 4 UFA years (Faber). This shit matters a lot.Makar got $500k more and was a point per game defenseman.
That has turned out to be extremely unfunny, actually.Like when we signed Nuke long term
On a scale of 1 to 5 yikeses how many yikeses is this?