Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | The Slow Crawl to the Season

sethro109

🏒 🎮🏈🇺🇸🍻
Sponsor
May 3, 2011
30,081
35,652
Centennial, CO
We already kinda know that.

There is an extreme vitriol against him... I'd say even more than Wood and I kinda get it, but also kinda don't. He's an average 3C who has some fundamental issues in his game (namely he has the same IQ as my autistic dog). So he's not the type of guy that people love. But he is a useful player and if deployed right, can bring in results.

IMO this also shows that you can pretty much put any player next to MacK and find success... especially on the PP.
Anyone but Compher.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: niwotsblessing

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,431
31,853
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Yeah, Colton definitely has a superior release to Compher. And I'd say it's superior to Kadri as well (maybe the power is comparable but I seem to remember Kadri being a bit inaccurate).

Switching him to the wing has simplified his game quite a bit, and it doesn't hurt to put him next to the two best forwards on the team. Before that he was really wandering around aimlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
39,945
45,285
Edmonton, Alberta
Yeah, Colton definitely has a superior release to Compher. And I'd say it's superior to Kadri as well (maybe the power is comparable but I seem to remember Kadri being a bit inaccurate).

Switching him to the wing has simplified his game quite a bit, and it doesn't hurt to put him next to the two best forwards on the team. Before that he was really wandering around aimlessly.
I think Colton's release is a lot quicker than Kadri's.

Always felt like Kadri had to corral it and drag to release.
 

Avs9296

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
3,206
4,925
Burakovsky had an absolute f***ing laser of a wrist shot. You had to turn the page on the calendar before he got it off but if he did look out. One of the few players in the league that can beat goalies clean without a screen from the circles.

I still miss him. Maybe not at his salary but he was a unique player for us and absolutely a big game player.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,431
31,853
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Bura was frustrating because he’d take forever to get his shot off, but he could absolutely wire that thing. Feel like he was the epitome of someone who would only shoot for corners.
It was an absolute laser but unfortunately it had a tendency to be a laser wielded by a Stormtrooper. I still crack up when I think of the time that Nate got so pissed at him at practice for missing the net continually. It worked that next game, I remember that much.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,431
31,853
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
He's also a really underrated passer. His offensive tools are elite.

He's just buttery soft and extremely perimeter.
I didn't get the impression he was soft. He certainly wasn't a "gritty" guy but he wasn't Mike Ribeiro either. What I found frustrating about him were the boneheaded plays. He'd dazzle you at one moment with his talent and drive play like crazy and then cough it up at the worst possible time. He was a great get by the Avs but I'm glad they also didn't pony up the $$$ when it came time.

He is quite possibly the ultimate transition game guy. That's where he's able to shine best, get the puck moving quickly the other direction and creating scoring chances for him and his teammates.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,431
31,853
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Eh I don't miss that guy at all, did anyone even notice he played last night?
Yeah, I saw him. His name popped up a few times. He's being expected to be a guy who carries a line and he can't do that. The Kraks just aren't that talented a team. Both Beniers and Wright might end up being those guys for Seattle but right now they're not good enough, and it's just a bunch of scrubs beyond that.

I don't really miss the guy but I still think he was a great find for the time he was in COL.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,294
26,564
Eh I don't miss that guy at all, did anyone even notice he played last night?
I mean the dudes a complimentary piece and he’s being expected to be a major contributor to a team with few building blocks. That shouldn’t be held against him.
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,872
10,849
We already kinda know that.

There is an extreme vitriol against him... I'd say even more than Wood and I kinda get it, but also kinda don't. He's an average 3C who has some fundamental issues in his game (namely he has the same IQ as my autistic dog). So he's not the type of guy that people love. But he is a useful player and if deployed right, can bring in results.

IMO this also shows that you can pretty much put any player next to MacK and find success... especially on the PP.

You still need a grinder who can shoot next to Mack.
I didn't get the impression he was soft. He certainly wasn't a "gritty" guy but he wasn't Mike Ribeiro either. What I found frustrating about him were the boneheaded plays. He'd dazzle you at one moment with his talent and drive play like crazy and then cough it up at the worst possible time. He was a great get by the Avs but I'm glad they also didn't pony up the $$$ when it came time.

He is quite possibly the ultimate transition game guy. That's where he's able to shine best, get the puck moving quickly the other direction and creating scoring chances for him and his teammates.

Pp2 never looked the same without him
 

The Moops

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2017
4,983
8,130
Earth


I mean the guy could do a no-look wrist shot through the net. That's pretty impressive - minus the 1000x he missed the net wide before this
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvsWraith

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,750
57,538
I really don't think you do... when with Drouin and Rants, he does great and neither of them are grindy types. I really think MacK can succeed with most any type of player at this point in his career. 6-7 years ago I don't think that was the case.
Plug any two average ~4M wingers next to Mack and that first line will still be elite. He's that great.

That was one of my point for not keeping Rantanen.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,294
26,564
Plug any two average ~4M wingers next to Mack and that first line will still be elite. He's that great.

That was one of my point for not keeping Rantanen.
I don’t necessarily think that’s true. We’d get by fine in the regular season but you still need talent in the top 6 to compete. If you have Marcus Foligno and Michael Bunting on your top line you aren’t winning a cup imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,431
31,853
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Plug any two average ~4M wingers next to Mack and that first line will still be elite. He's that great.

That was one of my point for not keeping Rantanen.
Even Sidney Crosby can’t get away with scrubs as linemates indefinitely. It speaks to MacKinnon’s versatility (or maybe just the fact that he’s that good) but the team would take a major step back without Rants in the lineup.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad