LOFIN
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2011
- 18,386
- 26,946
Not optimal when you look at his current play, to say the least.Colton is a bad contract?
Not optimal when you look at his current play, to say the least.Colton is a bad contract?
Nope, it was f***ing shitThe Star Trek Picard series was a pretty awesome send off for that crew though.
Can they do that? Even with Landeskog coming possibly back?They can do Miller for Mitts without trading Manson and have enough left over to fix the 3rd d pairing.
MacKinnon for Kotkaniemi, Chicago eating MacKs entire salary till his next UFA for 2050 7th rounder, naturally sending Bedard to Carolina as wellI want the next trade tonight. I’m impatient and drunk. I want fireworks baby
I would not mind Petterson, but if we could get him, might as well paid Mikko, right?Apparently Pettersson was the one going to the Canes before they pivoted to Mikko. Friedman mentions the Sabres as a team to watch for EP now.
Poor guy might go from having to deal with that scrub JT to possibly being sent to Buffalo.
3rd line LW who doesn't play PP and doesn't kill penalties making 4M with a NTC.Needed to not be signed in the first place
Colton is a bad contract?
I feel something is or was in discussion. Why would their GM attend multiple Avs games?Out of curiosity. Has anyone checked on Seth Jones to see if he's feeling better?
I almost believed we were going to see something done with him at some point last night as well.
Bring Naz home. Mitts for Nasty Naz.
Or make it bigger and include Andersson or Weegar.
A Flames fan has proposed
To Cgy:
Ritchie
Mittelstadt
To Col:
Kadri
Anderson
Definitely gave me pause. I wish Kadri was a bit younger, but it isn’t the worst trade by any means.
5 more years at 7M vs 3 more years at 5.75M.If they'd actually do that, I'd say yes. They'll be good enough through our contention window.
Kadri is 1C on a wild card team.
Naz brings some tenacity, feistiness, and swag or whatever you want to call it that this team seems to be lacking
Would the Flames retain on Naz? Probably not eh. Would be nice if another team would retain.
I don't think the Flames do that sort of thing. Some sort of front office cultural thing where they refuse to ever retainWould the Flames retain on Naz? Probably not eh. Would be nice if another team would retain.
5 more years at 7M vs 3 more years at 5.75M.
Happily take Naz over Casey's bum ass even if the last two years are brutal.
I don't think the Flames do that sort of thing. Some sort of front office cultural thing where they refuse to ever retain
Also they have no clue what they are doing. Basically they are hoping to stay mediocre forever.I don't think the Flames do that sort of thing. Some sort of front office cultural thing where they refuse to ever retain
Given the economy in Canada, you have to remain competitive if you want to sell tickets.Also they have no clue what they are doing. Basically they are hoping to stay mediocre forever.
Given the economy in Canada, you have to remain competitive if you want to sell tickets.
No longer is it the case where hockey trumps all and the fans will show up regardless. Just look at Winnipeg, 1st in the West and still struggle with attendance. Imagine if they were worse?
On top of that, they're building a brand new arena that costs a ton of money. Last thing fans want is a trash team to play there. However, if management was prudent they would tank the last few years in the Saddledome, sell off players and start fresh with high end talent in the new arena just like Edmonton (unintentionally) did.
Rantanen's been gone one game and we're back on Kadri. Fantastic.
Parts of Lebrun's interview with CMac:
Parts of Lebrun's interview with CMac: