- Aug 28, 2009
- 7,658
- 4,691
If we have an opportunity to make a lateral move and save money, shouldn’t we be all over those kinds of moves?Ehh… not sure he’s any better than Colton. Just different. He’ll still cost 2+m too.
If we have an opportunity to make a lateral move and save money, shouldn’t we be all over those kinds of moves?Ehh… not sure he’s any better than Colton. Just different. He’ll still cost 2+m too.
It may not even be a lateral move, and if it is, it is a one year savings where KK gets a similar contract the following season.If we have an opportunity to make a lateral move and save money, shouldn’t we be all over those kinds of moves?
To be honest, I don’t really want to move anyone. I’m simply looking at the possibilities that could exist.It may not even be a lateral move, and if it is, it is a one year savings where KK gets a similar contract the following season.
I know people really want to move Colton, but teams don’t acquire centers, sign them to term with a NTC, and get rid of them within the year. It just isn’t realistic.
Moving on from Nuke in some manner seems like the most realistic of the options out there. It clears the needed salary (even with a penalty) and the Avs still have enough wings to form up a top 6. Yeah the team is weaker than this last season, but that was always to be the case.To be honest, I don’t really want to move anyone. I’m simply looking at the possibilities that could exist.
I don’t believe the Avs will move Colton. But with the Nuke circumstance, uncertainty with Landeskog, the logjam at wing doesn’t feel so “logjammy” anymore.
So where else can the Avs shave?
The only other really feasible option is they terminate nuke, take a penalty, and load the roster with a bunch of cheap contracts and move no one. Doesn’t that seem more unrealistic?
Lehky, Rants...who else?Moving on from Nuke in some manner seems like the most realistic of the options out there. It clears the needed salary (even with a penalty) and the Avs still have enough wings to form up a top 6.
Krebs as a 3C would be an utter disaster
then trade himI thinks Mitts is getting more than $5.5M.
things change he is way overpaid for what he bringsIt may not even be a lateral move, and if it is, it is a one year savings where KK gets a similar contract the following season.
I know people really want to move Colton, but teams don’t acquire centers, sign them to term with a NTC, and get rid of them within the year. It just isn’t realistic.
He really isn’t. You’re not finding his offensive production for much less, if any less, on the UFA market, and we’d be paying a LOT in a potential trade for itthen trade him
things change he is way overpaid for what he brings
That’s incorrect. He’s at the market rate.then trade him
things change he is way overpaid for what he brings
Lehky, Rants, Landy, Nuke. And if Nuke doesn’t come back than Drouin is very clearly coming back.Lehky, Rants...who else?
@The Abusement Park nailed it. If Drouin is signed, Nuke is an inevitability. The Avs have plenty of wings… Lehky, Rants, Landy, Drouin (I think he’s signed), Wood, LOC and Kovi are 7 of the 8 wings penciled in for next season.Lehky, Rants...who else?
This is kinda the point I’m making. I really don’t see the top 6 wings. We have currently, 3 at best. I think we agree that Nuke is likely gone, but with a cap penalty. Sure, there’s the possibility of bringing back Drouin, but between his new salary, and a probably Nuke penalty, we’re probably close to Nuke’s cap hit. So no savings there.Moving on from Nuke in some manner seems like the most realistic of the options out there. It clears the needed salary (even with a penalty) and the Avs still have enough wings to form up a top 6. Yeah the team is weaker than this last season, but that was always to be the case.
Lehky, Rants, Landy and Drouin would be 4 top 6 wings. Most teams are not complete in that area and have a fringe guy in a higher role. You don’t need 4, but 4 is nice to have. Avs have it.This is kinda the point I’m making. I really don’t see the top 6 wings. We have currently, 3 at best. I think we agree that Nuke is likely gone, but with a cap penalty. Sure, there’s the possibility of bringing back Drouin, but between his new salary, and a probably Nuke penalty, we’re probably close to Nuke’s cap hit. So no savings there.
I’m pretty sure the Avs have to shed salary. If you shave a guy like Lehkonen, you’re still in the hole a winger.
You shave Colton, you’re in the hole a 3C.
I’d venture to guess that with the uncertainty of the quality of play from Landeskog, we can’t really afford to lose Nuke and another winger.
I mean, something has to happen. This is a pick your poison situation.
People starting to hate on my boyThat’s incorrect. He’s at the market rate.
I suspect that they will finally move Girard and bring in someone like Kulikov at a much cheaper caphit.This is kinda the point I’m making. I really don’t see the top 6 wings. We have currently, 3 at best. I think we agree that Nuke is likely gone, but with a cap penalty. Sure, there’s the possibility of bringing back Drouin, but between his new salary, and a probably Nuke penalty, we’re probably close to Nuke’s cap hit. So no savings there.
I’m pretty sure the Avs have to shed salary. If you shave a guy like Lehkonen, you’re still in the hole a winger.
You shave Colton, you’re in the hole a 3C.
I’d venture to guess that with the uncertainty of the quality of play from Landeskog, we can’t really afford to lose Nuke and another winger.
I mean, something has to happen. This is a pick your poison situation.
For a team that has held on to defensive depth and made certain they could backfill to move one (who will be moving on now)… losing another would be out of character.I suspect that they will finally move Girard and bring in someone like Kulikov at a much cheaper caphit.
Manson is a tough one. On one hand, he is the only physical presence on the defense. On the other, he is old and we've seen how bad he can be when he's playing hurt.For a team that has held on to defensive depth and made certain they could backfill to move one (who will be moving on now)… losing another would be out of character.
Though I’d argue Manson would be the smartest to move.
I’d much rather the Avs just plug that hole with rentals and just absorb that cost while giving flexibility during the first part of the season and summer.Manson is a tough one. On one hand, he is the only physical presence on the defense. On the other, he is old and we've seen how bad he can be when he's playing hurt.
Yeah it is going to have to be another busy deadline and an incomplete roster until then. Just have to hope Bednar won’t run the top guys into the ground before then.A top 6 of MacK/Rants/Drouin/Mitts/Landy/Lehky should be more than good enough to contribute offense in the regular season. If LOC is healthy-ish and can continue the chemistry with Colton/Wood, 3rd line is also fine. Throw some plugs on the 4th line and pickup a couple of grizzlies at the TDL. No concerns up front.
On backend, top 4 of Toews/Makar/G/Manson is also fine for regular season, but a couple of things... huge onus on them to stay healthy, and if they somehow remain healthy, Beds will probably give them huge minutes with a useless 3rd pairing behind them. Concern heading into playoffs with tired legs and will most certainly need another TDL addition for a 4/5 D if not a couple of bodies.
Yeah it is going to have to be another busy deadline and an incomplete roster until then. Just have to hope Bednar won’t run the top guys into the ground before then.