Prospect Info: 2024 18th Overall - Sacha Boisvert

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Not sure in Canada specifically but kids don’t learn how to hit until pretty late these days. Better for their longterm health but makes the bigger kids more of projects in that area. I think Martone will be that guy eventually, just might take time.
OT .... Back in the day, many talented teens quit the game because they were often thrust into a violent situation of players bigger, and more often than not, older. After bantam the age limits were right up to 18 years old. There were plenty of thugs who would never amount to anything on the ice.
 
OT .... Back in the day, many talented teens quit the game because they were often thrust into a violent situation of players bigger, and more often than not, older. After bantam the age limits were right up to 18 years old. There were plenty of thugs who would never amount to anything on the ice.
Yup, not that I was talented per se, but I shattered my ankle in half on a stupid play by a 'thug' who literally just wanted to hurt me. I wasn't very big at the time, playing against almost full grown men at the age of 15. I didn't play competitive hockey after that, not worth getting injured.
 
Not sure Vanacker projects out as a top 6 winger. We shall see

Also, Nazar has shown nothing to put his upside as a mere 3rd liner IMO nor has Boisvert play (Limited I remind you) shown himself to be a far greater option potentially down middle

Good problem to have right now having all these potential Cs in organization with top 9 potential. Some wont work out and others will move to wing of course still
Just IMO - but it's the definition of hubris to make a very specific definition of an 18YO kid NHL potential. In all honesty - there is very little predictability on their future.

I'm happy that the Hawks have a deep pipeline because a number of the guys we're all excited for will absolutely bomb, and hopefully there are guys who dropped in the ranking that figure it out and end up being legit NHL'ers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClydeLee
Not sure Vanacker projects out as a top 6 winger. We shall see

Also, Nazar has shown nothing to put his upside as a mere 3rd liner IMO nor has Boisvert play (Limited I remind you) shown himself to be a far greater option potentially down middle

Good problem to have right now having all these potential Cs in organization with top 9 potential. Some wont work out and others will move to wing of course still
Not sure what you meant about Nazar, your wording confused me a bit. If I’m reading it right you don’t think Nazar has shown anything that makes you believe he’s a first line player. If that’s true I’m wondering what you’re seeing that I’m missing? I’ve watched all the Icehogs games so far and for me he’s put to rest all the reservations I’ve had about him. I know It’s early but I believe we’ve found the perfect winger for Bedard next season. Just need some size for his other wing. Martone? McQueen? Hell, even Misa?
 
OT .... Back in the day, many talented teens quit the game because they were often thrust into a violent situation of players bigger, and more often than not, older. After bantam the age limits were right up to 18 years old. There were plenty of thugs who would never amount to anything on the ice.
True story. I played house league for a year because I needed a break from pee-wee travel check as a 14 year old.
 
When I played, I don’t recall any checking age limit. Personally, I think hockey went the wrong direction by moving the checking age to Bantam rather than down to Mites.

Bantam has a huge spread of physical maturity between the boys, with large weight and height differences. Coupled with not learning to keep heads up because of no checking at younger age, it’s a recipe for head and body injuries.

Let them learn about checking when they’re all small and light of weight, and learn to keep their heads up. The collisions are nonviolent in comparison with older age groups.
 
Not sure Vanacker projects out as a top 6 winger. We shall see

Also, Nazar has shown nothing to put his upside as a mere 3rd liner IMO nor has Boisvert play (Limited I remind you) shown himself to be a far greater option potentially down middle

Good problem to have right now having all these potential Cs in organization with top 9 potential. Some wont work out and others will move to wing of course still
I don't understand these absolute sentences about an 18-year-old player who reached 80 points while playing injured.
 
I don't understand these absolute sentences about an 18-year-old player who reached 80 points while playing injured.
Not sure Vanacker projects out as a top 6 winger. We shall see

Nazar has shown nothing to put his upside as a mere 3rd liner IMO nor has Boisvert play (Limited I remind you) shown himself to be a far greater option potentially down middle

Not that I'd be in the habit of defending the posts of @Blackhawkswincup but I'm missing the "absolute" parts in his post.

Now if you're talking Musto or JustinFields/KrisBryantisbest, that's another story.
 
When I played, I don’t recall any checking age limit. Personally, I think hockey went the wrong direction by moving the checking age to Bantam rather than down to Mites.

Bantam has a huge spread of physical maturity between the boys, with large weight and height differences. Coupled with not learning to keep heads up because of no checking at younger age, it’s a recipe for head and body injuries.

Let them learn about checking when they’re all small and light of weight, and learn to keep their heads up. The collisions are nonviolent in comparison with older age groups.
There is a ton of research out there that completely negates this argument. While it is true that the younger the kids are, the less variety in their size/maturity, you are just exposing them to checking for a much longer period of time which will lead to more injuries.
 
When I played, I don’t recall any checking age limit. Personally, I think hockey went the wrong direction by moving the checking age to Bantam rather than down to Mites.

Bantam has a huge spread of physical maturity between the boys, with large weight and height differences. Coupled with not learning to keep heads up because of no checking at younger age, it’s a recipe for head and body injuries.

Let them learn about checking when they’re all small and light of weight, and learn to keep their heads up. The collisions are nonviolent in comparison with older age groups.
There is a ton of research out there that completely negates this argument. While it is true that the younger the kids are, the less variety in their size/maturity, you are just exposing them to checking for a much longer period of time which will lead to more injuries.
It is an interesting debate. When there was no limitation to body checking by age, in my experience, body checking was quite rare prior to the peewee age anyway. I think it is a good idea to ban body checking at a young age but I also believe it is the responsibility of coaches to preach protecting oneself at all times ... even though body checking is against the rules it doesn't mean another player won't take a run at you. Back then, we were on our own to learn to protect oneself just to survive. it is a vastly different game now.... for the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pvr
Was at the North Dakota Miami Friday game in Oxford a couple hours ago. Thoughts on Boisvert:

Boisvert has a lethal shot that he probably doesn't use enough. Solid passer, but he's got an NHL shot that strikes fear into the opponent when UND has the puck in the offensive zone. Nice pass on UND's first goal for an assist, and scored the GWG with 23 seconds left with a nice snipe from fairly far out to complete the comeback for UND.
 


I am intrigued by this Jake Livanavage kid

Undrafted but has been great in NCAA

Why did he go undrafted?

Maybe worth consideration from Hawks

He's a small skilled offensive defenseman who isn't the best in his own zone. Should have been drafted though. Might top out as a guy too good for the A, but not good enough offensively make it in the NHL. AAAA type
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez68
Was at the North Dakota Miami Friday game in Oxford a couple hours ago. Thoughts on Boisvert:

Boisvert has a lethal shot that he probably doesn't use enough. Solid passer, but he's got an NHL shot that strikes fear into the opponent when UND has the puck in the offensive zone. Nice pass on UND's first goal for an assist, and scored the GWG with 23 seconds left with a nice snipe from fairly far out to complete the comeback for UND.
Is he physical and can he skate? I like what I've seen so far in the hi-lights.
 
I’ve warmed up to Boisvert since the draft (was totally pissed that Hage wasn’t drafted). His shot is lethal. If he develops into a nasty two way center with size, it’s a home run.
Musto hating this pick as much as he did should have made everyone here extremely optimistic. You can pretty much bet on his evaluations being 100% inaccurate.
 
Saw the game last night. They played a pretty good team in WMU, fairly good structure to their game. Not a team North Dakota can just breeze through. He looked pretty rough in the first two periods. Some giveaways, skated himself into a corner then loses the puck, a pass to nowhere on the rush. More bad than good and not noticeable. A lot of shifts he'd dance around in the D zone then try to cheat up a bit anticipating a turnover before it came. He had a better third period and you didn't see any of that, better puck management and a chance or two. Yet, they had a 5 on 4 in the last two minutes, it turned into a 4 on 4, he didn't see a shift which is lame cause I guess he had the OT winner in the previous game. In OT WMU had 15 seconds of 4 on 3 to open it and won it on the power play.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad