Prospect Info: 2024 18th Overall - Sacha Boisvert

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
I don’t see him like that, but I’m not a pro talent evaluator. I’ll be over the moon ecstatic if he turns out like they have him portrayed in that article.
Kopitar/Malkin comp would be ok or just fine in Q speak
 
Sascha Boisvert 1GP 1g 1a

Oliver Moore 2GP 0g 1a

It's early but let us see how thisvpkays out and who the fansxwillbe projecting as the better prospect for Center job higher i the lineup ..
 
Boisvert wired wrist shot from about 20' out for a beautiful goal. Scouts said he could shoot. And he looked big out there. We'll take that.
 
Last edited:
As much heat as I gave Davidson for leaving skill on the table in Hage Boisvert is the kind of player our pool is sore lacking and him reaching like an Anders Lee type of upside would be huge for us
 
As much heat as I gave Davidson for leaving skill on the table in Hage Boisvert is the kind of player our pool is sore lacking and him reaching like an Anders Lee type of upside would be huge for us
It'd be more huge to have Nikita Artamonov as a 70+ point winger
 
Why is he talking about Artamonov like he was in the discussion at 18? Mother trucker went #50. He should take up beef with every damn NHL team about this grave transgression.
#13 on my board.

Very much in the discussion for those that were in the know.
 
Im sure musto is right about some people some of the time. When you take that many shots aggressively you don’t miss all of them. Also even the best of the best in talent evaluation are apparently wrong a lot of the time. At least he has the guts to stick his head out to be cut off.
Throw shit at the wall, some of it sticks.
i had a long post like that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
Im more of the opinion that drafting is really hard so I didn’t like how we used 34 and 50 to go to 27. Or 20 and 50whatever to get to 18.

Not against Boisvert or Vanacker though.
 
Im more of the opinion that drafting is really hard so I didn’t like how we used 34 and 50 to go to 27. Or 20 and 50whatever to get to 18.

Not against Boisvert or Vanacker though.

in a vacuum, 100%. however, our pipeline is already getting crowded, so the rationale makes more sense. just gotta hope the kids we chose pan out. very early on that front, but I'm encouraged thus far
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad