Prospect Info: 2023 WJC Thread
- Thread starter Devs3cups
- Start date
-
HF Sportsbook has been reset for the new season - Click here to play.
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
Was watching TSN and they didn’t really have a strong opinion either way.
Not sure why this call is such a debate. The only possibly arguable part is that he got pushed but he was already in the crease and it was one-handed and more towards out of the crease than in.
Don’t think that’s a strong argument and otherwise it really isn’t debatable. He’s standing in the crease and blocks him from getting over. Like there was physical contact stopping him as he tries to slide over.
SteveCangialosi123
Registered User
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
SteveCangialosi123
Registered User
The announcer was reading the rule as they just showed it and he didn’t feel that broke the rule as it is written.
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
VoidCreature
Before you see the light, you must die.
Devils731
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2008
- 12,945
- 18,398
NHL Network and they read the IIHF rule.
It doesn’t look like the goalie is impeded by me. The goalie is stretching his leg out and the US player being there didn’t change his positioning or ability to make the save at all; there is almost no contact and none that appears to impede the goalie.
- May 8, 2010
- 21,718
- 38,279
IIHF 69.1 section 2:
"Goals should be disallowed only if:
(II) an attacking Player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a Goalkeeper, inside or outside of their Goal Crease. “Incidental contact” with a Goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the Goal Crease, provided the attacking Player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact."
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
What do you mean he wasn’t impeded?! He was sliding over and as he was doing that ran into the US player. There is very clearly contact that stops him as he slides over.
When outside of the crease lol. It was in the crease and he made no effort whatsoever to avoid it.
You quoted a rule saying incidental contact is allowed outside of the crease.
- May 8, 2010
- 21,718
- 38,279
Devils731
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2008
- 12,945
- 18,398
He’s stretching his leg out which causes his upper body to flip forward as he tries to stretch his leg more. He doesn’t get over more or less because of any contact that he causes.
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
He wasn’t just stretching tho. He was sliding over and ran into the USA player as he did so.
Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 52,523
- 46,252
No way that 2nd one should count. 1st one was borderline but I think it should have.
Officiating has actually been excellent in this tournament, breath of fresh air compared with the NHL.
- May 8, 2010
- 21,718
- 38,279
Just quoted the rule the US commentator quoted before the start of the 3rd.
Ripshot 43
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2010
- 14,226
- 12,169
Captain3rdLine
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2020
- 7,616
- 8,857
I don’t know who has said what where. All I know is the rule he just posted doesn’t say much about the goal that got ruled off.
Unknown Caller
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 10,322
- 7,956
- May 8, 2010
- 21,718
- 38,279
Hughes could have 2-3 points already. I've said that a lot this tournament but it's true. Many of his teammates whiffed on his passes caught posts, etc. I've liked his tournament, he had a rough 2nd period to start, but he's been fine since then.
That feed to keep the play in the zone was very good.
- May 8, 2010
- 21,718
- 38,279
