GDT: 2023 Upper Deck NHL Draft: 1st Round, June 28, 7 p.m. et | ESPN, SN, TVAS: Nashville, TN

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Followed by: did he skip leg days?

I always found muscles mostly irrelevant. If you need muscles to gain balance, you're only compensating suboptimal skeletal posture. This is the major reason why I think, for example, the greats of the past would still be better than 99% players of today, because they got lucky to have exactly the right frame/natural posture to give them maximal hockey efficiency, in the sense of weight transfer, balance, mobility, being able to go to the extreme ranges of their moves to do fakes and dekes, without losing their center. Mario Lemieux was a great example, he would go very far into his fakes without losing his core balance, people would buy it at those extremes, and he would just revert. They couldn't revert back so they were toast and he dangled them.

Another example is Doug Harvey's ungodly low center of gravity, as when he for example battled a forecheck in the corners of the defensive zone. His balance was so absolute, that no nutrition, training, or anything else than being born with exactly the right musculoskeletal frame could compete with that.

Guy Lafleur is another, where the curve of his natural spine was literally made to make him float over the ice giving him effortless speed and always be "loaded" with his weight transfer, which gave him power in his shot and with mobility to boot, so he could slap shot on the fly.

people don't talk about this enough, I wish it was more studied. There might even be some predictive value in just (somehow) measuring someone's posture, for prospects say.
 
Hughes met MM and is on record as being impressed.

Michkov only did photo ops with TVA sports and the boys from HabsTV.

He also went to the mister FRENCH restaurant and posted it online.

His necktie is white red and blue.

7qtgub.jpg

Oh. My. God.
 
Twas tongue in cheek. Should have added an emoji.

Just a comebacker to our usual forum obsession with certain physical attributes.

I know, just decided to springboard off of it. I really think the gym bros have it all wrong. Strength, size, mobility, and where they come from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
I don’t see how these are related. We were never going to draft a superstar with the 31st pick.
Absolutely. It wasn't even likely we would be drafting an everyday NHL'er at that spot, let alone a star player.
 

I don't know why, but I have a deep affection for Kent Hugues. I just completely trust his intelligence, on an immediate phrenological level. I know he's a shark, in my gut. Doesn't mean I will go along with the program on all counts though. I'm suspicious of his ties to the US system, for example. Could lead him astray from information overload.
 
Last edited:


What is Daniel Brière to you? To me, he's CLUTCH. He knows the kill. He has it, the killer instinct. Many told him he was too small, yet he had a great career in the NHL. And look at who he's aiming.

Michkov.

Thankfully for us, we pick before the Flyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabbyGuy
Like you, I’m old enough to have seen Richer’s career. I remember Serge Savard as DG complaining to media that it’s almost impossible to get elite players because of the draft system that was not that old at the time.

We’ve never had a crack at a player like this in 50 years. And they might pass? . If they’re dumb it’s better to be really really dumb. I’ll be like T.O fans having a blast during the Ballard years.
And Richer was not 6.4 --220
He was like 6ft 200
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shred
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad