Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Which ones do you disagree with?
What??
Trying reading what I was responding to.
Which ones do you disagree with?
Says a lot about advanced stats.
Probably coming up on time to trade Pasta, Carlo, Debrusk, and Lindholm. Wouldn't want them to get too old. No negative consequences to doing that - Sweeney should never let an old player stay on this team.
I really hope this is sarcasm. But I fear not...Correct.
Look what happened with Hall. Let him stay until he was 31 and then couldn't get much for him.
You responded to a post saying Debrusk had good advanced stats last year, right?What??
Trying reading what I was responding to.
I really hope this is sarcasm. But I fear not...
That they value guys who were on pace for 35 goals and can play defense?
I do too, and so should you—he had an objectively great season.
Probably coming up on time to trade Pasta, Carlo, Debrusk, and Lindholm. Wouldn't want them to get too old. No negative consequences to doing that - Sweeney should never let an old player stay on this team.
You responded to a post saying Debrusk had good advanced stats last year, right?
I know, and I was wondering which ones you thought were wrong. He sighted even strength production as one of them, goals per game.He also had a higher corsi than Bergeron and Marchand.Responding to advanced stats guys saying Debrusk was one of the best forwards in the NHL last season.
Louie ErikssonI’m sorry if I don’t follow - Krug he let expire. Who else has he done that with? I don’t disagree whatsoever that you can’t let JD walk for nothing if he’s going, but I’m not remembering others of value (save Krug) where he’s let that happen. I guess I’m struggling to understand how that’s his book so far.
Making it to Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals with said guys in their mid 30s and beyond is invalid to you, so what other kind of response could I possibly provide?Great response, never a failure on your part to produce immature responses.
Bruins must have a long line of success with the current model they are following of keeping guy in their mid 30s and beyond then I’m assuming. Could you please refresh my mind on how that’s worked out for them?
Making it to Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals with said guys in their mid 30s and beyond is invalid to you, so what other kind of response could I possibly provide?
Yes I do ..................you don't .Yes, it was sarcasm.
You really think Debrusk was one of the best forwards in the NHL last season?
Yes I do ..................you don't .
It's an inane argument, with the benefit of hindsight, that the Bruins should have traded Chara, Bergeron, Krejci, and Marchand over a period of a few years, and you should be embarrassed for having the opinion that they're somehow deficient for not choosing your course.Exactly my point. The closest you can come up with is the time they almost did it. This doesn’t go for only the bruins. It’s a time tested failure outside of the one anomaly being the 1971 montreal canadiens. So the bruins are trying to replicate a formula that hasn’t been done in 50+ years during a time when the league was very different
Yes, it was sarcasm.
You really think Debrusk was one of the best forwards in the NHL last season?
He was a legit top line winger last season. Stats and eye test agree.I guess it all depends on your definition of one of the best. Are you talking like top 30 forwards?
It's an inane argument, with the benefit of hindsight, that the Bruins should have traded Chara, Bergeron, Krejci, and Marchand over a period of a few years, and you should be embarrassed for having the opinion that they're somehow deficient for not choosing your course.
He was a legit top line winger last season. Stats and eye test agree.
Sitting out a quarter of the year with a broken leg might have had something to do with that.There’s 96 top line forwards in the NHL and points wise he was 114th last year, 142nd the season before. Then before that was his really bad year.
I’d certainly keep him around, but he hasn’t been a top line forward stats wise ever in his career technically.
You responded to a post saying Debrusk had good advanced stats last year, right?
Sitting out a quarter of the year with a broken leg might have had something to do with that.
You have one and only one barometer that allows you to say you were correct in all your bloviating - they haven't won a Cup.I’m not sure you understand the definition of the word hindsight.
Hindsight by definition is “the understanding of a situation or event after it has happened or developed”
I’ve had plenty conversations with you over the years IN THE MOMENT, of exactly what’s happened. So, no it is not hindsight as I’ve been calling for it before each season and as it’s been happening because it’s glaringly obvious.
And no I’m not embarrassed about being correct.