Yes trade DeBrusk ,so Sweeney can go back to looking for a RW that they have not had since Horton .................He will like doing that since he has been so successful at it ........
it would need to be conditional once again. where it would be a 26 if the wings end up with their 2025 pick. Imo its time to stop kicking that can down the road.
If Debrusk doesn't sign an extension, that may be the next best thing depending on the return of course. I'd package him and Swayman/Ulmmark for a future number one center, ala Lindholm. Although Calgary with Wolf around probably aren't looking at acquiring another Goalie.
Can we please have a button that says "f***, Yes"?
I agree if DeBrusk cannot be resigned he should be moved , but is Lindholm the answer , what is he next contract going to look like , is he really the player that will replace Bergey or Krecji , I might add he will be 30 when he starts his next contract , what will he look like at the end of 7-8 years , not sure I would be in favor of the look........My fear to many fans are in panic mode that the Bruins need a # 1 center , I just hope Sweeney and management do not enter that mode...........I know you all might think I am against Lindholm as a player ,I am not ,but I do not want to be handicapped by his costs to obtain and resign..........
They aren't rebuilding so why pass up on the opportunity to get a 1C in their prime and a top pairing defensemen about to enter it?
Intellectual dishonesty is saying he couldn’t buy a win at the dot while at the same time saying he practically won half his face offs (49%). Seems like he bought a bunch of wins. BTW the +\~ stat is very flawed as well.
You'd have to tell me what the deal would be, and it would have to be sensible.
