The Murph
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2018
- 794
- 968
Not convinced the Bruin's will be a bad team next year with Bergeron retiring. Thought the center's were the last reason the B's were a record breaking team. Their goaltending, defense, and winger depth were the superior reason's they won. Bergeron is an amazing all round player, Krejci is also not bad himself overall, but these are old players way past their prime as good as they still were last season. They were in a perfect role for only having to provide a steady game and had the support to play to their strengths, not having to carry their lines. Best situation for aging vets.
Replacing a 37 year old Bergeron and 36 year old Krejci (not retired yet), don't think will be the hardest part of next season. And playoff wise, these guys were injured, and didn't play well in the games they did play (Krejci game 7 was good).
Some believe Coyle can't be a 2nd line center, they believe it was tested already and it didn't work. My perspective is different. Didn't think he was given much of a chance (2/3 weeks?), and believe the switch of Haula and Coyle was to make Haula more useful, and they knew Coyle could carry the 3rd line, where Haula could not.
Zacha played mostly wing, but from my view he looked good at center the times he was there.
Offensively, Zacha and Coyle shouldn't be too far or could equal the production Bergeron and Krejci provided last year. Defensively, Bergeron can not be replaced, but Coyle is not a problem defensively, and Zacha looks like he's got potential for a good two way game.
More of a problem on this Bruin's is moving Zacha from wing to center, and losing Hall, that's two good wingers gone, and replaced with JVR. That's the downgrade if you ask me. And it's a big one. Geekie replacing Coyle is quite the question too, though Geekie is a good gamble. After that, the team is generally the same. With many players in, or entering the prime of their careers.
The Bruin's need to find a top center with some youth soon, absolutely. But missing the playoffs next season, still hard to doubt it, until see it happen.
Replacing a 37 year old Bergeron and 36 year old Krejci (not retired yet), don't think will be the hardest part of next season. And playoff wise, these guys were injured, and didn't play well in the games they did play (Krejci game 7 was good).
Some believe Coyle can't be a 2nd line center, they believe it was tested already and it didn't work. My perspective is different. Didn't think he was given much of a chance (2/3 weeks?), and believe the switch of Haula and Coyle was to make Haula more useful, and they knew Coyle could carry the 3rd line, where Haula could not.
Zacha played mostly wing, but from my view he looked good at center the times he was there.
Offensively, Zacha and Coyle shouldn't be too far or could equal the production Bergeron and Krejci provided last year. Defensively, Bergeron can not be replaced, but Coyle is not a problem defensively, and Zacha looks like he's got potential for a good two way game.
More of a problem on this Bruin's is moving Zacha from wing to center, and losing Hall, that's two good wingers gone, and replaced with JVR. That's the downgrade if you ask me. And it's a big one. Geekie replacing Coyle is quite the question too, though Geekie is a good gamble. After that, the team is generally the same. With many players in, or entering the prime of their careers.
The Bruin's need to find a top center with some youth soon, absolutely. But missing the playoffs next season, still hard to doubt it, until see it happen.