Hell maybe he even did consider it! I personally wouldn’t have for very long if I was in his situation though. Signing with the leafs for a season is in actuality a long term play by him. And it’s a brilliant one if he stays healthy.Exactly...I would have loved Bertuzzi back too, but he signed elsewhere...there's no way of knowing if he would have even considered 1 year with the Bruins.
Dude if Toronto shits the bed or he gets hurt, they are stuck with him.
The Bruins always get their pants pulled down to their ankles in front of everyone by random guys like Patrick Brown so it probably doesn't hahaI don't know if anything really matters anyway. Last year we had the best roster physically possible and they still historically shit their pants in April. So whether we have Bertuzzi or Patrick Brown, maybe it doesn't even f***ing mean anything.
1. I don't know how many proposals we saw on here that were more creative and thoughtful than the pithy one you just "outlined".Probably that plus walk away from most if not all their RFA’s. I don’t think it’s smart, they need to earmark that money for a first line center
Because Bertuzzi doesn’t put them over the top. Wanna know how I know?
There's plenty to criticize over the course of Sweeney being the GM, but please explain how the players failings are the GMs issue.What have the bruins done to make you so happy over the last 8 plus years? How’d 2019 go how’d last year go? Why don’t you take the bruins blinders off and assert the team and moves as such?
IF he can stay healthy. As they say "life is what happens when you're making other plans."He’s gonna get a lot more after next year, smart agent imo
He got a full NMC.Trade him at the deadline and get your first round pick back?
Nailed it. Perfect use of gender in English.They’re stuck until June? It protects them if he gets hurt or they shit the bed, its a good deal.
PS. My native language is gender indifferent so when I translate quickly in my head, I sometimes disregard the gender meanings in words like dude, guys etc so apologies if that came out wrong
Scott Walker 4everThe Bruins always get their pants pulled down to their ankles in front of everyone by random guys like Patrick Brown so it probably doesn't haha
I don’t even like Sweeney! I wanted him fired for Miller! I’ve said he’s gotten better every year on the job he’s been here, that’s accurate from what I’ve seen!1. I don't know how many proposals we saw on here that were more creative and thoughtful than the pithy one you just "outlined".
2. I thought part of the genius of the moves yesterday was that they could send these players down to Providence for free. So what was it? Did they spend all of their money or was it no risk?
3. Bertuzzi was clearly Plan A and Sweeney had other moves in place to accommodate.
4. If your plan (if you can call that dismissive gurgle a plan) had actually been the real one, you would have championed the "Sweenius" of it and came here with the same BS to spew at all of those who disagreed.
You can call out the perpetually negative all you want. I won't argue. But that isn't me. I call great when I see great (see my posts about this team being the best in the NJ last August for example). When I see horsepiss, I call horsepiss.
This is horsepiss
This is kind of where I'm at. If they couldn't find any success with a stacked team then I don't even think it matters who they're throwing over the boards.I don't know if anything really matters anyway. Last year we had the best roster physically possible and they still historically shit their pants in April. So whether we have Bertuzzi or Patrick Brown, maybe it doesn't even f***ing mean anything.
So the bruins had to rush to sign the garbage that we did? I can’t get on board with that
1. I don't know how many proposals we saw on here that were more creative and thoughtful than the pithy one you just "outlined".
2. I thought part of the genius of the moves yesterday was that they could send these players down to Providence for free. So what was it? Did they spend all of their money or was it no risk?
3. Bertuzzi was clearly Plan A and Sweeney had other moves in place to accommodate.
4. If your plan (if you can call that dismissive gurgle a plan) had actually been the real one, you would have championed the "Sweenius" of it and came here with the same BS to spew at all of those who disagreed.
You can call out the perpetually negative all you want. I won't argue. But that isn't me. I call great when I see great (see my posts about this team being the best in the NHL last August for example). When I see horsepiss, I call horsepiss.
This is horsepiss
If there was no possible way they could have afforded Bertuzzi, then why were they negotiating with him? Why was term the hangup?
Seriously this "no money" excuse is total nonsense
Also to repeat1. I don't know how many proposals we saw on here that were more creative and thoughtful than the pithy one you just "outlined".
2. I thought part of the genius of the moves yesterday was that they could send these players down to Providence for free. So what was it? Did they spend all of their money or was it no risk?
3. Bertuzzi was clearly Plan A and Sweeney had other moves in place to accommodate.
4. If your plan (if you can call that dismissive gurgle a plan) had actually been the real one, you would have championed the "Sweenius" of it and came here with the same BS to spew at all of those who disagreed.
You can call out the perpetually negative all you want. I won't argue. But that isn't me. I call great when I see great (see my posts about this team being the best in the NHL last August for example). When I see horsepiss, I call horsepiss.
This is horsepiss
Boston doesn’t have a lot of bad contracts. But they do have a few that are slightly overpaid.Hall and Bertuzzi not being here is a major mess up. their cap numbers are very affordable