An0n
My french sucks.
- Sep 18, 2010
- 4,739
- 2,911
We want goalsDvorsky is Danault. I don't want Danault at #5, or #6 or #7.
We want goalsDvorsky is Danault. I don't want Danault at #5, or #6 or #7.
Dvorsky has much more offensive upside than Danault. His shot alone makes him jealous.Dvorsky is Danault. I don't want Danault at #5, or #6 or #7.
They are very different players indeed.Except Phil is a much better skater and thinks the neutral zone game a lot better. I don’t think you can compare the two, they are really different.
Danault is a pretty solid player in my book. I wasn't being derogatory towards Dvorsky's potential.Dvorsky has much more offensive upside than Danault. His shot alone makes him jealous.
On the flip side, while Dvorsky is a very responsible player, I don't think he'll ever be as dominant defensively as Danault. And it's fine.
I don't think you can really compare both and saying they're equal is simply not true and an insult to Dvorsky's potential.
Dvorsky's also a better skater than ROR.I don’t really see the Danault comp at all lol
I see something like a more physical ROR with an elite shot.
I’d say so, though I do think he kind of skates like ROR which isn’t a good thing lolDvorsky's also a better skater than ROR.
Dvorsky's 3rd in scoring in the WU18 with 8 points and has 5 goals despite no supporting cast and a tough schedule. Imagine if he was centering Perrault and Leonard and had USA's schedule (FAR weaker division). He'd have 18 points.I just don't see any elite upside in his game, and that's fine. I think we can do better at #5.
At this point, if the Habs are picking 5-6-7, I could get behind pretty much everyone in the top 10ish. From Reinbacher to Yager.
I'm pretty sure he must have had a (or many) skating coaches during the last 5 years. And pretty sure he spent countless hours during the offseason training his skating.I’d say so, though I do think he kind of skates like ROR which isn’t a good thing lol
I’ve said it before, but Dvorskys a great athlete who just needs a skating coach. If he can elevate his skating ability he can be special.
Homerun at 17? Gabe Perreault, Samuel Honzek, Matthew Wood, Quentin Musty. These are guys that could really explode with more development.Until May 8th, it's more or less useless to debate our top pick. There will be plenty of time to do that.
What we should focus on is what's the homerun pick at 17....
Sell me...
PS: theres already a thread for the trade for Dubois reply...
Crazy to think we could add one of them along with a top 7 pick (that could be 1 or 2).Homerun at 17? Gabe Perreault, Samuel Honzek, Matthew Wood, Quentin Musty. These are guys that could really explode with more development.
from the little I've seen he's very good defensively. I don't know if he's quite Guhle level D but close. Guhle has more reach. Kind of like more O but less D than Guhle? Not by much in either area.Does Reinbacher have some standout skills ? Reading about him he seems to be a solid prospect but a little bit vanilla
Would Hanifin be a good comp ?
I get the point, and perhaps he has, but his stride is inconsistent and flawed currently. There is major room for improvement.I'm pretty sure he must have had a (or many) skating coaches during the last 5 years. And pretty sure he spent countless hours during the offseason training his skating.
He for sure can elevate his skating by becoming more strong physically. But, as others have said, this idea that elite young players "need a skating coach" is very flawed because most have had the best skating coaches available already.
Perrault, Otto Stenberg and Colby Barlow would be my targets. Cristall would be an upside pick. Haltunnen too.Until May 8th, it's more or less useless to debate our top pick. There will be plenty of time to do that.
What we should focus on is what's the homerun pick at 17....
Sell me...
PS: theres already a thread for the trade for Dubois reply...
Very highly, you dont only draft hockey players, you draft potential future leaders of your team. Work rate, compete level matters alot for me.Tough to evaluate but how do people rate the character/compete/clutch nature of the top eligible draft picks? I want an elite offensive player just as much as everyone else but I don't want a characterless loser like Matthews
For sure, I meant how do you compare the character/compete/clutch nature of the top draft eligible players in this draft (specifically in the 5-7 range where the Habs are likely to draft)? Smith vs. Benson vs. Reinbacher vs. Dvorsky etc.Very highly, you dont only draft hockey players, you draft future potential leaders of your team. Work rate, compete matters alot for me.
Hughes was just interviewed by tsn from the u18s. He reiterated that this year again they will emphasize character and ability to thrive inthe tough Montreal market.Very highly, you dont only draft hockey players, you draft potential future leaders of your team. Work rate, compete level matters alot for me.
I think what Dvorsky did today bodes very well for him in that regard. In a must win game, he put his team on his back and willed them to victory.For sure, I meant how do you compare the character/compete/clutch nature of the top draft eligible players in this draft (specifically in the 5-7 range where the Habs are likely to draft)? Smith vs. Benson vs. Reinbacher vs. Dvorsky etc.