Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,965
- 3,110
At #6 would you rather have ;
Mortiz Seider = Reinbacher
Raymond = Smith
Mortiz Seider = Reinbacher
Raymond = Smith
At #6 would you rather have ;
Mortiz Seider = Reinbacher
Raymond = Smith
in that case i take SmithI think Seider was better than Reinbacher is.. and I think Smith is better than Raymond was.
I had Jiricek over Nemec from the WJC and on, even with his injury. And I think I’m gonna stand by this one.Nope, not in the top 10. Only Nemec would be in this year's top 10, he was the real number 1.
Wright could very well be another Daniel Cleary..... A player with high potential that peaked in junior.Each time i saw Cooley and Wright play, i was always more impressed by Cooley. I still put Wright 1st on my list before the draft. Probably because he scored 39 goals at 15 in the OHL…
I had Jiricek over Nemec from the WJC and on, even with his injury. And I think I’m gonna stand by this one.
All is well in the world, the last 24 hours never happened.woohoo Arizona won tonight, back at #5
I have made my decision, Bedard no matter what
Wood has grown on me a lot these past months. His skting is horrid but man the rest is tantalizing.I think Cristall and Wood are my hot takes this year. The stats are just a little bit too much to overlook.
Comparing Cristall to Benson, Cristall's production is better, but it's just slightly better (0.15 ppg better) so I could understand people valuing Benson's motor etc. But I think that's a mistake.
I normally dislike the team strength argument, and I'm not using it to say that Benson is bad or is riding coat tails. I'm just saying some adjustment probably needs to be made. Winnipeg scored just under 55% more goals than Kelowna, 115 more goals. There's just no way that such a huge gap doesn't affect their respective point production. Cristall was in on 45% of Kelowna's goals, Benson was in on 30% of Winnipeg's. Cristall ended up scoring more goals in fewer games played, had more shots on goal in fewer games for a significantly higher shots/g. Too many indicators pointing to Cristall not just being a little bit better offensively, but significantly better.
About Matthew Wood, find me a more productive U18 NCAA player in the last 20 years. End of story.
Not obvious enough.Arizona will find a way to loose againts Anaheim , these guys are tanking soo bad it's too freaking obvious.
Pisses me off .
We'll end up with #6
I think Cristall and Wood are my hot takes this year. The stats are just a little bit too much to overlook.
Comparing Cristall to Benson, Cristall's production is better, but it's just slightly better (0.15 ppg better) so I could understand people valuing Benson's motor etc. But I think that's a mistake.
I normally dislike the team strength argument, and I'm not using it to say that Benson is bad or is riding coat tails. I'm just saying some adjustment probably needs to be made. Winnipeg scored just under 55% more goals than Kelowna, 115 more goals. There's just no way that such a huge gap doesn't affect their respective point production. Cristall was in on 45% of Kelowna's goals, Benson was in on 30% of Winnipeg's. Cristall ended up scoring more goals in fewer games played, had more shots on goal in fewer games for a significantly higher shots/g. Too many indicators pointing to Cristall not just being a little bit better offensively, but significantly better.
About Matthew Wood, find me a more productive U18 NCAA player in the last 20 years. End of story.
I agree on Wood..
Cristall I've liked all year but I've had to bump down his placement, top 10 is way too rich of a gamble on a guy with the skating issues and the wild swings in performances from game to game. I've noticed a lot of repeated patterns in his delay game, as he goes up levels, with better defenders, I don't know if he is gonna problem solve well enough or if he will be able to adapt his offense to being marked on his delay game.
Benson is definitely a more translatable talent, though I definitely can see a reality where Cristall is the better offensive producer.. but Benson has more favorable outcomes and a range of outcomes where he's an NHL contributor, there's probably only one path for Cristall.
He's definitely not a perfect prospect, and I have seen what you're talking about, but he's my hot take.
There's worse hot takes out there, for sure.
If someone gets it right on Cristall, a lot of teams will kick themselves.
Nah we're winning 1 or 2. Stop being negativeOh probably not but I don't expect to pick top five anyway so it doesn't really matter.
Chicago is 100% tankingNot obvious enough.
Players don’t TANK…..fan bases on chat forums do!!
There is significant drop after the top 4Quick question which I’m sure has been asked: is there a clear cut top 7 that makes finishing in 5th place desirable?
Or is there a drop off after the top 4?