2023 NHL Entry Draft

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reinbacher doesn't have that dynamic offensive game that Jiricek has, their similarities offensively is the big shot but Jiricek is much more implicated in the rush, will jump in on the cycle, etc.

Reinbacher does have a more polished defensive game.

Reinbacher should end up in the top 10 of -most- draft lists, he did come out of nowhere. He's an Austrian defender playing in the Swiss league.
Reinbacher is a mix of Jiricek an Nemec, weaker defensive IQ and transition game than Nemec, weaker shot than Jiricek. Good mix of the two styles though.
 
I can see why a team would prefer Reinbacher to Benson (even though I think Benson clearly is the guy with the greatest potential after that top 4), but in MTL's case, I don't see the fit. We have Guhle, Barron, Harris and Xhekaj who are all NHL defencement and good ones. Matheson is here to stay (at least for the next 3 years) and we have Hutson (potential first pairing), Mailloux (potential high scoring PP specialist) and Engstrom who's had one of the best D+1 SHL season in recent history for a Dmen. Thats 8! really good dmen. Why go the Reinbacher route when there's so much offensive talent available?

Oh and Trudeau is doing amazingly well for a guy who could have went back in the Q this year.
 
I'm absolutely on team "move Florida's pick to get Carlsson at 3".

We need the quality > quantity so badly.
Benson is very close to those guys and there's a real chance that he ends up a top 3 guy in a redraft in 5-6 years. We'd be blessed to draft him that kind of player imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan
I can see why a team would prefer Reinbacher to Benson (even though I think Benson clearly is the guy with the greatest potential after that top 4), but in MTL's case, I don't see the fit. We have Guhle, Barron, Harris and Xhekaj who are all NHL defencement and good ones. Matheson is here to stay (at least for the next 3 years) and we have Hutson (potential first pairing), Mailloux (potential high scoring PP specialist) and Engstrom who's had one of the best D+1 SHL season in recent history for a Dmen. Thats 8! really good dmen. Why go the Reinbacher route when there's so much offensive talent available?

Oh and Trudeau is doing amazingly well for a guy who could have went back in the Q this year.
Of the plyers you mention, only Barron and Mailloux are RHDs. The former is showing potential to be a top 4D but does not seem top 2D material. Mailloux is a big question mark. If you think Reinbacher could become a top 2D, you take it no hesitation. Also Guhle has yet to show that he can stay healthy while Harris, Xhekaj are rather bottom pairing who could take over top 4 duties in case of injuries. I like Engstrom but he is a maybe.
 
I can see why a team would prefer Reinbacher to Benson (even though I think Benson clearly is the guy with the greatest potential after that top 4), but in MTL's case, I don't see the fit. We have Guhle, Barron, Harris and Xhekaj who are all NHL defencement and good ones. Matheson is here to stay (at least for the next 3 years) and we have Hutson (potential first pairing), Mailloux (potential high scoring PP specialist) and Engstrom who's had one of the best D+1 SHL season in recent history for a Dmen. Thats 8! really good dmen. Why go the Reinbacher route when there's so much offensive talent available?

Oh and Trudeau is doing amazingly well for a guy who could have went back in the Q this year.
Because in the list you name, only Barron and Mailloux are RD

And I don't see a #1 Dmen in that list (maybe Guhle but more sure he's a cornerstone DMen)
 
I can see why a team would prefer Reinbacher to Benson (even though I think Benson clearly is the guy with the greatest potential after that top 4), but in MTL's case, I don't see the fit. We have Guhle, Barron, Harris and Xhekaj who are all NHL defencement and good ones. Matheson is here to stay (at least for the next 3 years) and we have Hutson (potential first pairing), Mailloux (potential high scoring PP specialist) and Engstrom who's had one of the best D+1 SHL season in recent history for a Dmen. Thats 8! really good dmen. Why go the Reinbacher route when there's so much offensive talent available?

Oh and Trudeau is doing amazingly well for a guy who could have went back in the Q this year.
I agree unless the D prospect is elite like with last year's top D draftees, it's not worth it when you can take a high end forward. Hopefully Habs don't have to worry about that and get a top 4 pick
 
I've seen morons saying we can't take Benson because we have Caufield, RHP, Gallagher, Farrell, Mesar, etc. Literally only Caufield is a small player that's a fixture in our future forward core. The rest of those guys are filler and half of them won't even be around in a few years or make it at all.
Why can’t you make your point without calling people morons?
 
Because in the list you name, only Barron and Mailloux are RD

And I don't see a #1 Dmen in that list (maybe Guhle but more sure he's a cornerstone DMen)
Well, Reinbacher isnt a number one D either, though I feel like Hutson might be. And you don't need to absolutely have 3RD and 3LD to be a contender lol.

Matheson-Barron
Guhle-Hutson
Xhekaj-Mailloux
Harris-Engstrom

Is pretty solid
 
I can certainly make the argument that Reinbacher is every bit as good as Nemec.
I would say this : Nemec has two weaknesses - shot strength, - physical strength and Reinbacher is better than him in both areas even though the shot is not his greatest strength either. That being said, Nemec positioning and defensive IQ are elite for a player of his age and while I think Reinbacher has those qualities he does not have them at Nemec level. Skating + transition game is also better on Nemec side.
 
I would say this : Nemec has two weaknesses - shot strength, - physical strength and Reinbacher is better than him in both areas even though the shot is not his greatest strength either. That being said, Nemec positioning and defensive IQ are elite for a player of his age and while I think Reinbacher has those qualities he does not have them at Nemec level. Skating + transition game is also better on Nemec side.

Reinbacher has a bomb of a shot.
 
Well, Reinbacher isnt a number one D either, though I feel like Hutson might be. And you don't need to absolutely have 3RD and 3LD to be a contender lol.

Matheson-Barron
Guhle-Hutson
Xhekaj-Mailloux
Harris-Engstrom

Is pretty solid
I don‘t think Hutson can be a number 1 in the sense of a Makar or Hedman because he does not have their strength… At best he will be a 1 offensive Dman but not a cornerstone Dman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vachon23
Of the plyers you mention, only Barron and Mailloux are RHDs. The former is showing potential to be a top 4D but does not seem top 2D material. Mailloux is a big question mark. If you think Reinbacher could become a top 2D, you take it no hesitation. Also Guhle has yet to show that he can stay healthy while Harris, Xhekaj are rather bottom pairing who could take over top 4 duties in case of injuries. I like Engstrom but he is a maybe.
So, you think our forward core (prospects and player) is deeper and stronger than our D core? I think absolutely not

I don‘t think Hutson can be a number 1 in the sense of a Makar or Hedman because he does not have their strength… At best he will be a 1 offensive Dman but not a cornerstone Dman.
So Fox isn't a number one defensemen either I take it.
 
So, you think our forward core (prospects and player) is deeper and stronger than our D core? I think absolutely not


So Fox isn't a number one defensemen either I take it.

Not sasing the forward core is much deeper, just saying MTL does not have a 1D yet.

Fox is bigger and stronger than Hutson. At some point his size will be a defensive weakness…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vachon23
I personally am comfortable penciling in Guhle, Mailloux and Hutson as a top 3 going forward. These are not Brook/Fleury types, these are blue chip studs with track records and traits.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: le_sean
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad