2023 NHL Entry Draft

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
What separates Brzustewicz (who I quite like) from Reinbacher?

I also quite like Brzustewicz, but Reinbacher is just a lot better IMHO, and not just PlAyInG aGaInSt mEn, but looking exceptional while doing it (at least in my viewings).

Bigger, faster, better shooter (Brzustewicz is an awful shooter), very clever passer, and projects as someone who could be a dominant defensive player as well.

Brzustewicz I have more as a good 2nd pairing guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
I also quite like Brzustewicz, but Reinbacher is just a lot better IMHO, and not just PlAyInG aGaInSt mEn, but looking exceptional while doing it (at least in my viewings).

Bigger, faster, better shooter (Brzustewicz is an awful shooter), very clever passer, and projects as someone who could be a dominant defensive player as well.

Brzustewicz I have more as a good 2nd pairing guy.
Also much more agressive as a player, Reinbacher is always pinching/going down with the puck, pushing his pace, I wouldn't say Bustewich does that much. He's closer to ASP or Gulyayev, behind Drago too.
 
I wouldn't say Smith has a higher ceiling. Both have similar ceiling, Smith is just average sized while Benson is smol.
I was reffering to the comparaison between Nick and Smith. I don't know a lot about Smith, but from what I read, don't look like a two way center?
 
I was reffering to the comparaison between Nick and Smith. I don't know a lot about Smith, but from what I read, don't look like a two way center?
Oh, then no, Nick is a better offensive talent. Theyre not that similar to me. Zegras is closer to what Smith is, but without the wizz-kid stickhandling and a simpler game, so not really Zegras, mind you... Also doesn't have the vanilla playstyle that I hate Zegras so much for so that comparison isn't too close. Just tools wise, lets say.

He's not a bad two-way forward, in that sense, he is like Nick, above average-ish. He's sometimes soft though.
 
Oh, then no, Nick is a better offensive talent. Theyre not that similar to me. Zegras is closer to what Smith is, but without the wizz-kid stickhandling and a simpler game, so not really Zegras, mind you... Also doesn't have the vanilla playstyle that I hate Zegras so much for so that comparison isn't too close. Just tools wise, lets say.

He's not a bad two-way forward, in that sense, he is like Nick, above average-ish. He's sometimes soft though.
Don't really like the pick at 5-6 if he's not a good two way player and if his upside is less than a 65-70pts.
 
Also much more agressive as a player, Reinbacher is always pinching/going down with the puck, pushing his pace, I wouldn't say Bustewich does that much. He's closer to ASP or Gulyayev, behind Drago too.

Definitely. I saw him hem a pro team into their zone twice with super aggressive (but well timed pinches), which forced them to ice the puck. His team won the draw and got a shot on net. It was all Reinbacher.
 
I can imagine a team taking Reinbacher earlier than his ranking.

What if the Habs first round grabs went:

Michkov
Reinbacher
Rehkopf (TDL acquired pick) ?

Just spit ballin’ here. Looking forward to seeing Rehkopf in three weeks.
If we get Michkov and Reinbacher I don't give a flying cuck what they pick for the next 10 years after

That would be the ultimate freaking draft. Potential superstar forward and potential top pair D ? Jeez.
 
If we get Michkov and Reinbacher I don't give a flying cuck what they pick for the next 10 years after

That would be the ultimate freaking draft. Potential superstar forward and potential top pair D ? Jeez.
What’s the highest Reinbacher realistically goes?

Thinking Top 10 is possible bc “somebody” will want a prime D and he’s it.
 
What’s the highest Reinbacher realistically goes?

Thinking Top 10 is possible bc “somebody” will want a prime D and he’s it.
Tough to know. I think Carlsson and Fantili are solid top 3.

Michkov is a wild card but of course I have him as a solid top 4 too. (2nd)

I think Reinbacher starts at 4 and goes all the way to 12, after that youre daydreaming.
 
Depends how the rest of his season goes, I suppose. If he does Seider things at the WCs, he could go 5. If he doesn't then yeah somewhere in that Florida pick range.
Always at least one horse that makes a late charge. In Horvat’s draft year, i thought/dreamed Habs were going to finally get that 1C.

Then Horvat tore it up in the playoffs and moved from mid-first to the player everyone talked about, and beyond Montreal’s grasp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Tough to know. I think Carlsson and Fantili are solid top 3.

Michkov is a wild card but of course I have him as a solid top 4 too. (2nd)

I think Reinbacher starts at 4 and goes all the way to 12, after that youre daydreaming.
Yep I think you are right, don't Reinbacher after 12, I believe fans underrate Dmen at the draft but that some GMs won't be afraid to draft them early. I could definitely see Reinbacher + ASP entering top 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Ran an NHL and NBA tankathon this morning.

Habs got 1st and 11th. Bedard and Reinbacher?

Raps got 1st. Wembanyama. I'd be a very happy man.
Can you run the sim for the NHL plz :D

Getting out of the draft with Bedard and Reinbacher would be a dream scenario. Just add Hrabel/Bjarnarsson with the 2nd round pick and I don’t care who we draft for the rest of the draft !
 
You think he could be a game breaker? How do you explain that he is not one at the MHL level right now? Does he have a single tool that screams even top pair?

Lets go even more simple, what does Gulyayev do better than Reinbacher, or even ASP for that matter.

(I am always looking for the next great russian prospect, I always overrate them, Gulyayev was my golden ticket, but to me he doesnt even look like a player Id spend a second on.)

I absolutely think he could be one, though once again it will require the proper coaching to help reel in his deficiencies defensively. There's also a gambling streak that has to be ironed out.

Having said such, I still think his skating is great, not the greatest top end speed but his ability to gain separation on his first couple of strides is more important to me. I think he could be a top notch transition player and possibly even a great offensive threat, particularly on the powerplay, with his combination of skating and puck skills (only Sandin-Pelikka and Cagnoni are in the same vein). Whether that translates into a top-pairing D-man or a second-pairing guy who mans the first PP or a straight up bust, that I am not sure of just yet, but I'm putting my chips on the former for the time being.

I'll have to schedule a viewing in the next little while to see if my opinion holds up. Truth be told, I will have less time than expected to keep up my prospect watching, at least compared to the fall semester, so it'll probably be limited to one for Gulyayev at this point as I try to catch up on other prospects who haven't been watched yet.

I double checked my list and I have Sandin-Pelikka at 11, it's tight. The latter is very similar to Gulyayev to me, just right handed and more toned down (less dynamic but also less prone to positioning errors). I find both players have these weird moments in the defensive end where they are a little to casual, if that makes any sense, and they are suddenly overwhelmed for not engaging earlier in the play.

With Reinbacher, my limited sample had me seeing his size and how he moves well within his frame. My viewings of his suggest he is more advanced (from a pro game lens) at this stage compared to the other defensemen in this class, outside of MAYBE Simashev but I'd still lean Reinbacher. I'm not convinced he is the next Moritz Seider or David Jiricek yet, my league play viewing of his (i.e., not the WJC which was an unfair situation) gives me the impression of a minute-munching defender who drives decent results both ways and can occasionally break out of his shell and move the puck up ice instead of handing it off to the next guy constantly. I don't think he is in the same league as the other two with the puck, and I don't know if I see top tier upside so much as a second-pairing guy who eats minutes, which is great but not my preference when drafting this high.

On the flipside, Reinbacher is a newer prospect to me as I never caught any matches of his pre-WJC, so I have him pegged for least two more in-season viewings to assemble a more complete picture on my thots and feelings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenris and Mrb1p
Can you run the sim for the NHL plz :D

Getting out of the draft with Bedard and Reinbacher would be a dream scenario. Just add Hrabel/Bjarnarsson with the 2nd round pick and I don’t care who we draft for the rest of the draft !
I dont know enough about Reinbacher other than limited viewing at WJHC and a few highlights here and there. He seems to be taking over the consensus top D man in this draft.

Getting out of this draft with the top player, d man, goalie and PLD would be even better than last off season. Sneak in a few solid picks that might fall like Cam Allen in the third and Alex Pharand in the 4th would be wishful thinking. But stranger things have happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vachon23
Just read that Reinbacher played sick through the WJC tournament, bedridden when not playing, missing 1 game. I must say Im impressed, I thought he had a very good showing despite sickness. His situation is similar to the one of Slafkovsky as well who left his country to play in Liiga at 16. Reinbacher left Austria at 14 yrs old with his familly to play in Switzerland. That shows alot of determination and total commitment to his hockey carreer.

I think Recrutes have him way too low in their ranking though. On another side, they now have Moore ranked 3rd among N.A. skaters after Bedard and Fantilli.

Hey Grant, take a longer look at Gavin Brindley, kid is awesome!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad